Mongolia Growth Group Ltd.
Mongolia Growth Group Ltd. (YAK-H.V) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (YAK-H.V) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YAK-H.V | CA$1.25 | +0.00% | 31.8M | -2.55 | -CA$0.49 | N/A |
| BPO-PI.TO | CA$20.15 | +1.00% | 9.8B | 4.66 | CA$4.32 | +7.95% |
| FSV.TO | CA$193.52 | +2.05% | 8.9B | 44.18 | CA$4.38 | +0.81% |
| CIGI.TO | CA$148.73 | +3.37% | 7.4B | 52.93 | CA$2.81 | +0.28% |
| TCN.TO | CA$15.34 | -0.78% | 4.2B | 27.39 | CA$0.56 | +1.13% |
| AIF.TO | CA$47.75 | +3.44% | 1.9B | -1591.67 | -CA$0.03 | +1.26% |
| MEQ.TO | CA$175.75 | -0.39% | 1.6B | 5.87 | CA$29.95 | +0.11% |
| SVI.TO | CA$4.40 | +0.76% | 1.6B | -146.67 | -CA$0.03 | +0.27% |
| REAX.TO | CA$2.42 | -5.10% | 435.9M | -14.24 | -CA$0.17 | N/A |
| MPC.TO | CA$4.90 | +0.00% | 291.3M | 11.14 | CA$0.44 | +9.08% |
Stock Comparison
YAK-H.V vs BPO-PI.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, BPO-PI.TO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while BPO-PI.TO trades at CA$20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BPO-PI.TO's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BPO-PI.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to BPO-PI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check BPO-PI.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs FSV.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, FSV.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while FSV.TO trades at CA$193.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas FSV.TO's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FSV.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to FSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check FSV.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs CIGI.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, CIGI.TO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while CIGI.TO trades at CA$148.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas CIGI.TO's P/E ratio is 52.93. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CIGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to CIGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check CIGI.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs TCN.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, TCN.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while TCN.TO trades at CA$15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas TCN.TO's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TCN.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to TCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check TCN.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs AIF.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, AIF.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while AIF.TO trades at CA$47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas AIF.TO's P/E ratio is -1591.67. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AIF.TO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to AIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check AIF.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs MEQ.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, MEQ.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while MEQ.TO trades at CA$175.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas MEQ.TO's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MEQ.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to MEQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check MEQ.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs SVI.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, SVI.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while SVI.TO trades at CA$4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas SVI.TO's P/E ratio is -146.67. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SVI.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to SVI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check SVI.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs REAX.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, REAX.TO has a market cap of 435.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while REAX.TO trades at CA$2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas REAX.TO's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to REAX.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to REAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check REAX.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs MPC.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, MPC.TO has a market cap of 291.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while MPC.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas MPC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MPC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is more volatile compared to MPC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check MPC.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs BRE.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, BRE.TO has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while BRE.TO trades at CA$13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BRE.TO's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BRE.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to BRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check BRE.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs IVQ.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, IVQ.TO has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while IVQ.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas IVQ.TO's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IVQ.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is more volatile compared to IVQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check IVQ.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs BEK-B.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, BEK-B.TO has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while BEK-B.TO trades at CA$12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BEK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BEK-B.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is more volatile compared to BEK-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check BEK-B.TO's competition here
YAK-H.V vs EMER.CN Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, EMER.CN has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while EMER.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas EMER.CN's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EMER.CN's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is more volatile compared to EMER.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check EMER.CN's competition here
YAK-H.V vs TEMP.CN Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, TEMP.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while TEMP.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas TEMP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TEMP.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is more volatile compared to TEMP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check TEMP.CN's competition here
YAK-H.V vs BPY-UN.TO Comparison April 2026
YAK-H.V plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAK-H.V stands at 31.8M. In comparison, BPY-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YAK-H.V is priced at CA$1.25, while BPY-UN.TO trades at CA$23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAK-H.V currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BPY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, YAK-H.V's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BPY-UN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YAK-H.V is less volatile compared to BPY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAK-H.V.Check BPY-UN.TO's competition here