Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while FESGX trades at $83.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check FESGX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while SGIIX trades at $88.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check SGIIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while FEGRX trades at $88.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check FEGRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while SGENX trades at $88.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check SGENX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while APO trades at $118.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to APO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check APO's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APO-PA has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while APO-PA trades at $62.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas APO-PA's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to APO-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to APO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check APO-PA's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while GBLEX trades at $41.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check GBLEX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while AGVEX trades at $29.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check AGVEX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while FSGGX trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check FSGGX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while MDLOX trades at $20.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check MDLOX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PAVE trades at $55.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PAVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PAVE's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while GLFOX trades at $20.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check GLFOX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while GLIFX trades at $20.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check GLIFX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LSITX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while LSITX trades at $70.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas LSITX's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to LSITX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to LSITX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check LSITX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CGGO trades at $36.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CGGO's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JATSX trades at $61.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JATSX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JATNX trades at $68.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JATNX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JATAX trades at $64.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JATAX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JATIX trades at $69.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JATIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JAGTX trades at $67.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JAGTX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JNGTX trades at $68.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JNGTX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check AAM-PB's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check AAM-PA's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while QYLD trades at $17.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to QYLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check QYLD's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while IOO trades at $127.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check IOO's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PRGSX trades at $72.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PRGSX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PAGSX trades at $70.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PAGSX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while VHGEX trades at $38.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check VHGEX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PGGFX trades at $27.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PGGFX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while DFGEX trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check DFGEX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JAGCX trades at $50.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JAGCX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while GUNR trades at $53.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check GUNR's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PRGTX trades at $27.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PRGTX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, URA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while URA trades at $53.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas URA's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to URA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to URA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check URA's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JFNIX trades at $82.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JFNIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JFNCX trades at $68.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JFNCX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JFNSX trades at $77.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JFNSX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JAGLX trades at $81.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JAGLX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JNGLX trades at $82.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JNGLX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JFNNX trades at $82.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JFNNX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JFNAX trades at $80.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JFNAX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PRJQX trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PRJQX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PRJZX trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PRJZX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SIL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while SIL trades at $103.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas SIL's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to SIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check SIL's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CMTFX trades at $111.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CMTFX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CGTUX trades at $114.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CGTUX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CTHRX trades at $114.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CTHRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CTCAX trades at $104.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CTCAX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CTHCX trades at $87.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 37.01. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CTHCX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JDWNX trades at $122.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JDWNX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JWWFX trades at $126.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JWWFX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JDWRX trades at $122.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JDWRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JWWCX trades at $118.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JWWCX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JDWAX trades at $125.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JDWAX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while REET trades at $26.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check REET's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while GNR trades at $73.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check GNR's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JWGRX trades at $125.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JWGRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JAWWX trades at $122.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JAWWX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, COPX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while COPX trades at $86.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas COPX's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to COPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to COPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check COPX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while VNQI trades at $50.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to VNQI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check VNQI's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RING has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while RING trades at $90.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas RING's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to RING's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to RING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check RING's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while DGSIX trades at $22.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check DGSIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CTYRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while IXJ trades at $100.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check IXJ's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while BGHIX trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check BGHIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while BOTZ trades at $38.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check BOTZ's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while ACWV trades at $123.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check ACWV's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while SGTTX trades at $105.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check SGTTX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while MGGIX trades at $34.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check MGGIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CSGZX trades at $104.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CSGZX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while MGGPX trades at $31.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check MGGPX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while DFGR trades at $28.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check DFGR's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while APHGX trades at $29.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check APHGX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while APDGX trades at $29.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check APDGX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while ARTGX trades at $29.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check ARTGX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VGPMX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while VGPMX trades at $23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas VGPMX's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to VGPMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to VGPMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check VGPMX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while NFRA trades at $66.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check NFRA's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while GCOW trades at $46.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GCOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check GCOW's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while VGWAX trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check VGWAX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while VGWLX trades at $29.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check VGWLX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while MLPX trades at $69.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to MLPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check MLPX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while LSWWX trades at $26.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check LSWWX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while LGMCX trades at $24.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check LGMCX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while LGMAX trades at $25.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check LGMAX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGTRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while SGTRX trades at $91.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas SGTRX's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SGTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to SGTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check SGTRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check CCHRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JORIX trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JORIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JORAX trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JORAX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while BIALX trades at $28.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check BIALX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JORFX trades at $20.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JORFX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JORNX trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JORNX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JSLNX trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JSLNX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JORRX trades at $19.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JORRX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while IILGX trades at $30.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check IILGX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while JORCX trades at $18.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check JORCX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while OPGIX trades at $53.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check OPGIX's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while PFFD trades at $19.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check PFFD's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ICLN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while ICLN trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas ICLN's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ICLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to ICLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check ICLN's competition here

XYLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XYLD stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROBO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYLD is priced at $40.83, while ROBO trades at $77.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XYLD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.65, whereas ROBO's P/E ratio is 34.10. In terms of profitability, XYLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ROBO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XYLD is less volatile compared to ROBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYLD.Check ROBO's competition here