Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC (XSLR.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XSLR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSLR.L | £54.33 | -0.28% | 159M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EMIM.L | £3,002.41 | -0.29% | 2.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IUSA.L | £4,752.05 | +0.35% | 1.5T | N/A | N/A | +1.01% |
| SSAC.L | £7,486.19 | +0.29% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,508.67 | +0.58% | 1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | £2,896.00 | +0.00% | 993B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | £8,104.94 | +1.07% | 869.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,903.50 | +0.73% | 868.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.66% |
| UB0D.L | £2,370.30 | -0.60% | 838.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.59% |
| MEUD.L | £22,810.00 | +0.47% | 788.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
XSLR.L vs EMIM.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, EMIM.L has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while EMIM.L trades at £3,002.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMIM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EMIM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to EMIM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check EMIM.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IUSA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IUSA.L trades at £4,752.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IUSA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SSAC.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SSAC.L trades at £7,486.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SSAC.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SMEA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SMEA.L trades at £7,508.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SMEA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IITU.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 993B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IITU.L trades at £2,896.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IITU.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XESC.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 869.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XESC.L trades at £8,104.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XESC.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XESX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 868.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XESX.L trades at £4,903.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XESX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XESX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs UB0D.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 838.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while UB0D.L trades at £2,370.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check UB0D.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs MEUD.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 788.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while MEUD.L trades at £22,810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check MEUD.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CNAL.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 693.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CNAL.L trades at £12,202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CNAL.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IWRD.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 603.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IWRD.L trades at £6,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IWRD.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XMMS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 592.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XMMS.L trades at £5,009.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XMMS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XDAX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 560.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XDAX.L trades at £19,632.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XDAX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XMUS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 532.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XMUS.L trades at £14,210.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XMUS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs MXWS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 520.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while MXWS.L trades at £9,687.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check MXWS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs PHGP.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 502.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while PHGP.L trades at £22,934.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check PHGP.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XMEU.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 497.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XMEU.L trades at £8,577.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XMEU.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs GLDA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 490.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while GLDA.L trades at £9,774.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check GLDA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CS51.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 471B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CS51.L trades at £17,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CS51.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs UC44.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 467.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while UC44.L trades at £13,121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check UC44.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs UB32.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 461.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while UB32.L trades at £9,260.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check UB32.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IEEM.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 419.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IEEM.L trades at £3,669.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IEEM.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs EUE.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while EUE.L trades at £4,740.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check EUE.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SEMA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 381B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SEMA.L trades at £3,461.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SEMA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CACX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 353.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CACX.L trades at £6,817.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CACX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XSX6.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 337.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XSX6.L trades at £12,073.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XSX6.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 318.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,524.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IWFQ.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs GBSS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 298.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while GBSS.L trades at £22,672.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check GBSS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CEA1.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 287.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CEA1.L trades at £15,771.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CEA1.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IWFV.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 284.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IWFV.L trades at £3,863.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IWFV.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SGBX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 273.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SGBX.L trades at £23,678.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SGBX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs RBTX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 263.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while RBTX.L trades at £1,123.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check RBTX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SUES.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 249.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SUES.L trades at £640.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SUES.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 247.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,946.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CPJ1.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs JRDE.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 244.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while JRDE.L trades at £3,682.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check JRDE.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs JERE.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 244.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while JERE.L trades at £3,974.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check JERE.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs ISPY.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 242.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while ISPY.L trades at £2,259.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check ISPY.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IWFM.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 232.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IWFM.L trades at £6,853.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IWFM.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs PHSP.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 220.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while PHSP.L trades at £2,557.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check PHSP.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XXSC.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 219.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XXSC.L trades at £5,660.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XXSC.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs HMEF.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 219B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while HMEF.L trades at £931.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check HMEF.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SPGP.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 191.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SPGP.L trades at £1,958.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SPGP.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XDEV.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 190.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XDEV.L trades at £3,979.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XDEV.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs UIFS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 188.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while UIFS.L trades at £1,139.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check UIFS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SOYU.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SOYU.L trades at £299.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SOYU.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CEUR.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CEUR.L trades at £31,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CEUR.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IEFV.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IEFV.L trades at £929.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IEFV.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 164B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,624.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XDEQ.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CU1.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CU1.L trades at £49,115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CU1.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IUQF.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IUQF.L trades at £1,161.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IUQF.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs UC79.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 153.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while UC79.L trades at £1,190.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check UC79.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs PRIR.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 150.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while PRIR.L trades at £1,491.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check PRIR.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs ISP6.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 150.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while ISP6.L trades at £6,875.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check ISP6.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs WATL.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while WATL.L trades at £6,081.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check WATL.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs GBSP.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 148.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while GBSP.L trades at £1,717.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check GBSP.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XCX6.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XCX6.L trades at £1,439.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XCX6.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CB5.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CB5.L trades at £4,475.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CB5.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CG1.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CG1.L trades at £37,181.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CG1.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CUS1.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CUS1.L trades at £40,530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L and CUS1.L have similar daily volatility (1.44).Check CUS1.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IPRP.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IPRP.L trades at £2,693.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IPRP.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs GILS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while GILS.L trades at £10,152.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check GILS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CSPX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CSPX.L trades at £689.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CSPX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs GSPX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, GSPX.L has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while GSPX.L trades at £10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GSPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to GSPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check GSPX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XZEU.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XZEU.L trades at £2,809.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XZEU.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SP5G.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SP5G.L trades at £218.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 68.17. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SP5G.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs H50E.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while H50E.L trades at £4,891.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check H50E.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs INFL.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while INFL.L trades at £10,063.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check INFL.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IGSG.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IGSG.L trades at £6,139.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IGSG.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs EQSG.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while EQSG.L trades at £5,499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check EQSG.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XDEM.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XDEM.L trades at £5,771.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XDEM.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 121B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while 0GWB.IL trades at £482.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check 0GWB.IL's competition here
XSLR.L vs IJPN.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IJPN.L trades at £1,482.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IJPN.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IWDA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IWDA.L trades at £122.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IWDA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IWDG.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IWDG.L has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IWDG.L trades at £1,054.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IWDG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IWDG.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XRSG.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XRSG.L trades at £24,998.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XRSG.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs JRDM.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while JRDM.L trades at £2,479.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check JRDM.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IEUX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IEUX.L trades at £4,076.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IEUX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs DAXX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 112.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while DAXX.L trades at £19,137.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check DAXX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs PRIC.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while PRIC.L trades at £1,650.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check PRIC.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XLKQ.L trades at £59,604.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XLKQ.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs COMM.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while COMM.L trades at £529.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to COMM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check COMM.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs WQDS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while WQDS.L trades at £568.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check WQDS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CSCA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CSCA.L trades at £17,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CSCA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IUKD.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IUKD.L trades at £862.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IUKD.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,590.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check PRIJ.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs RIEG.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while RIEG.L trades at £1,466.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check RIEG.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs TRXS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while TRXS.L trades at £3,404.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check TRXS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs INAA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while INAA.L trades at £8,853.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INAA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check INAA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IGUS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IGUS.L trades at £14,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IGUS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs MTIX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while MTIX.L trades at £14,384.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check MTIX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CRPX.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CRPX.L trades at £13,266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CRPX.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs CSP1.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while CSP1.L trades at £50,882.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check CSP1.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs EQDS.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while EQDS.L trades at £542.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check EQDS.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs IDVY.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while IDVY.L trades at £1,987.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check IDVY.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs UB45.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while UB45.L trades at £6,367.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check UB45.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs HMCH.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while HMCH.L trades at £596.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check HMCH.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SWDA.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SWDA.L trades at £9,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SWDA.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs XDN0.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while XDN0.L trades at £4,071.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check XDN0.L's competition here
XSLR.L vs SPES.L Comparison August 2025
XSLR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSLR.L stands at 159M. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XSLR.L is priced at £54.33, while SPES.L trades at £4,359.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSLR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSLR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SPES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSLR.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSLR.L.Check SPES.L's competition here