iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF XSI.TO Peers
See (XSI.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSI.TO | $16.85 | -0.05% | 43.69M | 10.75 | $1.57 | +4.38% |
| BNC.TO | $28.23 | -0.39% | 8.54B | 13.90 | $2.03 | +9.02% |
| EIT-UN.TO | $15.57 | -0.38% | 2.83B | 21.04 | $0.74 | +7.44% |
| NUBF.TO | $21.12 | +0.28% | 2.43B | 14.55 | $1.45 | +4.23% |
| NREA.TO | $23.82 | -1.20% | 1.31B | 20.83 | $1.14 | +1.92% |
| PFIA.TO | $10.05 | -0.50% | 1.31B | N/A | N/A | +4.26% |
| AD-UN.TO | $18.43 | -1.13% | 837.04M | 4.57 | $4.03 | +7.36% |
| MKB.TO | $19.02 | +0.05% | 804.63M | N/A | N/A | +3.69% |
| FIE.TO | $8.38 | -0.12% | 794.42M | 13.34 | $0.63 | +5.72% |
| HDIF.TO | $8.11 | -0.73% | 396.31M | 19.19 | $0.42 | +10.83% |
Stock Comparison
XSI.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 8.54B. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while BNC.TO trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and BNC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while EIT-UN.TO trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while NUBF.TO trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while NREA.TO trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and NREA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while PFIA.TO trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs AD-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 837.04M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while AD-UN.TO trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 804.63M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while MKB.TO trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 794.42M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while FIE.TO trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 396.31M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while HDIF.TO trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 348.44M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while XTR.TO trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 244.56M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while CIC.TO trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 224.10M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while VCIP.TO trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs IFRF.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 197.87M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while IFRF.TO trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and IFRF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.49M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while CCOR.TO trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and CCOR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 154.34M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while ZMI.TO trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 147.85M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while PBY-UN.TO trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 116.33M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while MGB.TO trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and MGB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 110.21M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while HUBL.TO trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 109.13M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while FAP.TO trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 99.85M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while MID-UN.TO trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 97.51M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while PLDI.TO trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to PLDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 90.32M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while BMAX.TO trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 89.84M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while PIC-A.TO trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 83.00M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while TLF.TO trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and TLF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 81.24M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while BGI-UN.TO trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while FFI-UN.TO trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 73.20M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while XINC.TO trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 70.32M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while HTAE.TO trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 58.88M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while RBN-UN.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 58.83M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while XSC.TO trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and XSC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 54.39M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while HGR.TO trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 52.64M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while HHLE.TO trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.16M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while SKG-UN.TO trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 31.28M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while FCGI.TO trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and FCGI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 27.01M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while RIFI.TO trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to RIFI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 26.11M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while INC-UN.TO trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 25.39M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while EARN.TO trades at $48.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and EARN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 16.21M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while PIN.TO trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and PIN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 15.45M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while PHR.TO trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to PHR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 13.93M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while ZWQT.TO trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs ETP.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 13.83M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while ETP.TO trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to ETP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while REIT.TO trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and REIT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 9.79M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while FGX.NE trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and FGX.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.68M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while BSO-UN.TO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.51M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and CIQ-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs TPAY.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while TPAY.TO trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 6.52M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while FCMI.TO trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and FCMI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs ENI-UN.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 4.95M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while ENI-UN.TO trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO and ENI-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XSI.TO vs CES.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.84M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while CES.TO trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs HID.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while HID.TO trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.
XSI.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison
XSI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XSI.TO stands at 43.69M. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, XSI.TO is priced at $16.85, while HBFE.TO trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.75, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, XSI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XSI.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XSI.TO.