XP Factory Plc
XP Factory Plc (XPF.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XPF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPF.L | £11.08 | -1.56% | 19.7M | -11.25 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| 0EV1.L | £29.47 | -4.32% | 38.9B | -3.61 | -£8.31 | N/A |
| CCL.L | £2,047.00 | +0.69% | 28.8B | 14.27 | £1.41 | N/A |
| 0RNQ.L | £493.70 | -0.44% | 12.1B | 48.23 | £10.24 | +1.52% |
| GAW.L | £15,560.00 | -0.26% | 5.1B | 29.43 | £5.30 | +3.88% |
| 0N7N.L | £21.25 | +1.19% | 1.1B | -5.73 | -£3.71 | +4.72% |
| BOWL.L | £250.00 | +0.81% | 415.8M | 14.53 | £0.17 | +4.93% |
| TEG.L | £411.00 | -0.24% | 286M | 13.70 | £0.30 | N/A |
| GYM.L | £151.88 | -0.08% | 267.5M | 75.90 | £0.02 | N/A |
| TUNE.L | £158.90 | -0.69% | 90.9M | 51.67 | £0.03 | +4.26% |
Stock Comparison
XPF.L vs 0EV1.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, 0EV1.L has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while 0EV1.L trades at £29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0EV1.L's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0EV1.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to 0EV1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check 0EV1.L's competition here
XPF.L vs CCL.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, CCL.L has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while CCL.L trades at £2,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas CCL.L's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CCL.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to CCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check CCL.L's competition here
XPF.L vs 0RNQ.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, 0RNQ.L has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while 0RNQ.L trades at £493.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0RNQ.L's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0RNQ.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to 0RNQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check 0RNQ.L's competition here
XPF.L vs GAW.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, GAW.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while GAW.L trades at £15,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas GAW.L's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GAW.L's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to GAW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check GAW.L's competition here
XPF.L vs 0N7N.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, 0N7N.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while 0N7N.L trades at £21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0N7N.L's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0N7N.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to 0N7N.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check 0N7N.L's competition here
XPF.L vs BOWL.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, BOWL.L has a market cap of 415.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while BOWL.L trades at £250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas BOWL.L's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOWL.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to BOWL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check BOWL.L's competition here
XPF.L vs TEG.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, TEG.L has a market cap of 286M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while TEG.L trades at £411.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas TEG.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TEG.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. XPF.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and TEG.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check TEG.L's competition here
XPF.L vs GYM.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, GYM.L has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while GYM.L trades at £151.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas GYM.L's P/E ratio is 75.90. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GYM.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to GYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check GYM.L's competition here
XPF.L vs TUNE.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, TUNE.L has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while TUNE.L trades at £158.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas TUNE.L's P/E ratio is 51.67. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TUNE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to TUNE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check TUNE.L's competition here
XPF.L vs CCT.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, CCT.L has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while CCT.L trades at £296.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas CCT.L's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CCT.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to CCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check CCT.L's competition here
XPF.L vs TND.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, TND.L has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while TND.L trades at £218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas TND.L's P/E ratio is -218.00. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TND.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L and TND.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TND.L's competition here
XPF.L vs GFIN.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, GFIN.L has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while GFIN.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas GFIN.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GFIN.L's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to GFIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check GFIN.L's competition here
XPF.L vs 0QQV.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, 0QQV.L has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while 0QQV.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0QQV.L's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0QQV.L's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L and 0QQV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0QQV.L's competition here
XPF.L vs ESC.L Comparison July 2025
XPF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPF.L stands at 19.7M. In comparison, ESC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XPF.L is priced at £11.08, while ESC.L trades at £31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas ESC.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, XPF.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ESC.L's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, XPF.L is less volatile compared to ESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPF.L.Check ESC.L's competition here