Xinyi Solar Holdings Limited
Xinyi Solar Holdings Limited XNYIF Peers
See (XNYIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XNYIF | $0.27 | N/A | 2.5B | 13.58 | $0.02 | +11.79% |
| GCPEF | $0.12 | -4.00% | 3.4B | -6.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| XISHY | $6.26 | -5.79% | 2.8B | 20.18 | $0.31 | +10.23% |
| SMTGF | $25.00 | N/A | 867.5M | -5.42 | -$4.61 | +2.17% |
| SMTGY | $2.30 | -0.86% | 798.1M | -5.00 | -$0.46 | +2.25% |
| GRMZF | $11.30 | N/A | 261.1M | 21.32 | $0.53 | +1.26% |
| HYSR | $0.02 | -0.93% | 116.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSSXF | $0.03 | N/A | 75.6M | -3.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SPRQF | $0.60 | N/A | 70.7M | -15.11 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| UGEIF | $1.46 | +0.69% | 49.2M | -3.17 | -$0.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
XNYIF vs GCPEF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while GCPEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to GCPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs XISHY Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while XISHY trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to XISHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SMTGF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMTGF has a market cap of 867.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SMTGF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SMTGF's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMTGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SMTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SMTGY Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 798.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SMTGY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SMTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs GRMZF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs HYSR Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while HYSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs CSSXF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CSSXF has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while CSSXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CSSXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to CSSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SPRQF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SPRQF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SPRQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs UGEIF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to UGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs CVUEF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while CVUEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs NEWH Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while NEWH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs FLDI Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while FLDI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs PXPC Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while PXPC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs CBUTF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SEHLF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SEHLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SEHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SAENF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SAENF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SAENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs NTCXF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs TSPG Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while TSPG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to TSPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs PTOS Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while PTOS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to PTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs AACTF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AACTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while AACTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas AACTF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AACTF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to AACTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SIRC Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SIRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs QCLSF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 699.3K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs PSWW Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PSWW has a market cap of 635.8K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while PSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSWW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to PSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs ANTGF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to ANTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs UNSS Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while UNSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to UNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SPSO Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SPSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SPSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs ABCE Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while ABCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to ABCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs OPVS Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while OPVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to OPVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs CHJI Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while CHJI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CHJI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SOEN Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18.3K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SOEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SOEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs NTAC Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NTAC has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while NTAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NTAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to NTAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SRWRF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SRWRF has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SRWRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SRWRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRWRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SNRS Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SNRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs XDSL Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while XDSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to XDSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs MBCI Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while MBCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to MBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs SUNWQ Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to SUNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs VSOLF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to VSOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs APVNF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while APVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs PPRW Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while PPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPRW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to PPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs GRYG Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while GRYG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs GSLO Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while GSLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to GSLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs EDYYF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs EBODF Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while EBODF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to EBODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs IXEH Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while IXEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is more volatile compared to IXEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs ISUNQ Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 47. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to ISUNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.
XNYIF vs KOVR Comparison
XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 44. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.27, while KOVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to KOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.