Xinyi Solar Holdings Limited

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 13.64B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while FSLR trades at $127.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SMTGY trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SMTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while NXT trades at $41.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ENPH trades at $44.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 40.73. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while XISHY trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to XISHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while GCPEF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to GCPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, RUN has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while RUN trades at $6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas RUN's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to RUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 762.83M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SEDG trades at $12.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 751.89M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ARRY trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 607.49M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while CSIQ trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 521.02M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SHLS trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SMTGF has a market cap of 491.35M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SMTGF trades at $14.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SMTGF's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMTGF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SMTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.05M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 226.37M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while JKS trades at $17.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 141.88M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while TOYO trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.15M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while CSLR trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 129.84M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while HYSR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 84.24M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ZEO trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 75.88M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SPRQF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SPRQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, CSSXF has a market cap of 75.63M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while CSSXF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CSSXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 70.82M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SOL trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 67.50M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while PN trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PN's P/E ratio is 125.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 54.54M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SMXT trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 51.39M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while TYGO trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.16M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and UGEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 42.81M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while MAXN trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 38.73M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while FTCI trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FTCI's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 37.15M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SPRU trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 36.37M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while CVUEF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 26.72M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while NOVA trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 25.37M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while NEWH trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.21M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SPI trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.80M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while FLDI trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 22.78M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while BEEM trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 18.30M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while PXPC trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while VVPR trades at $3.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 10.84M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while VSTE trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 9.06M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SPWR trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +64.69%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.06M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while PEGY trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and PEGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 5.84M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while TURB trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SEHLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SEHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SAENF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SAENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.41M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SUNW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 3.02M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ASTI trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, AACTF has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while AACTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas AACTF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AACTF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to AACTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.25M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ISUN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while TSPG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to TSPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while PTOS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to PTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.33M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SIRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SIRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 1.01M. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 796173.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578001.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and ANTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 452204.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ZEOWW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, PSWW has a market cap of 397358.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while PSWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSWW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to PSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60055.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while UNSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and UNSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43283.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SPSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SPSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26052.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ABCE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and ABCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24025.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while OPVS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and OPVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19389.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while CHJI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to CHJI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18307.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SOEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SOEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, NTAC has a market cap of 18114.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while NTAC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NTAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and NTAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SRWRF has a market cap of 17875.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SRWRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SRWRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRWRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to SRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16606.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SNRS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SNRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 9477.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and ISUNQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8498.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while XDSL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and XDSL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7030.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while MBCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and MBCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4607.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to VSOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3135.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while APVNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3075.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while PPRW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPRW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and PPRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3041.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while GRYG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 1309.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while GSLO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to GSLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while EBODF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to EBODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while IXEH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and IXEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 57.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF and SUNWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

XNYIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XNYIF stands at 3.06B. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 44.00. Regarding current trading prices, XNYIF is priced at $0.34, while KOVR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XNYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNYIF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XNYIF is less volatile compared to KOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNYIF.