Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAQ.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XNAQ.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XNAQ.L | £40.21 | +0.36% | 1.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EMIM.L | £2,992.00 | -0.30% | 2.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IUSA.L | £4,732.25 | +0.34% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +101.19% |
| EQGB.L | £44,212.50 | +0.68% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SSAC.L | £7,448.00 | +0.30% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,427.00 | +0.08% | 965.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | £2,867.00 | +0.70% | 954.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,845.50 | +0.31% | 855.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.70% |
| XESC.L | £7,981.50 | +0.30% | 855B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UB0D.L | £2,277.50 | +1.12% | 805.8B | N/A | N/A | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
XNAQ.L vs EMIM.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EMIM.L has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while EMIM.L trades at £2,992.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMIM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMIM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to EMIM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check EMIM.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IUSA.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IUSA.L trades at £4,732.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IUSA.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs EQGB.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while EQGB.L trades at £44,212.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check EQGB.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SSAC.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SSAC.L trades at £7,448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SSAC.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SMEA.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 965.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SMEA.L trades at £7,427.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SMEA.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IITU.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 954.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IITU.L trades at £2,867.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IITU.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XESX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 855.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XESX.L trades at £4,845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XESX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XESC.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 855B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XESC.L trades at £7,981.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XESC.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs UB0D.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 805.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while UB0D.L trades at £2,277.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check UB0D.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs MEUD.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 781.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while MEUD.L trades at £22,592.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check MEUD.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CNAL.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 687.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CNAL.L trades at £12,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CNAL.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IWRD.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 606.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IWRD.L trades at £6,528.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IWRD.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XDAX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 563.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XDAX.L trades at £19,548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XDAX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XMMS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 556.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XMMS.L trades at £4,992.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L and XMMS.L have similar daily volatility (0.72).Check XMMS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs MXWS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 527.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while MXWS.L trades at £9,632.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check MXWS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XMUS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 525.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XMUS.L trades at £14,154.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XMUS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs PHGP.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 514.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while PHGP.L trades at £23,563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check PHGP.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs GLDA.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 501.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while GLDA.L trades at £10,038.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check GLDA.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XMEU.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 494.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XMEU.L trades at £8,489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XMEU.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs UC44.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 476.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while UC44.L trades at £13,088.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check UC44.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CS51.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 469.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CS51.L trades at £17,449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CS51.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IEEM.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 407.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IEEM.L trades at £3,649.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IEEM.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs UB32.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 401.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while UB32.L trades at £9,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check UB32.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs EUE.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 396.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while EUE.L trades at £4,726.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check EUE.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SEMA.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 356.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SEMA.L trades at £3,448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SEMA.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CACX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 353.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CACX.L trades at £6,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CACX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XSX6.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 335.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XSX6.L trades at £11,976.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XSX6.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 324.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IWFQ.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs GBSS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 305.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while GBSS.L trades at £23,201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check GBSS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IWFV.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 290.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IWFV.L trades at £3,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IWFV.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SGBX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 280.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SGBX.L trades at £24,221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SGBX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CEA1.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 271.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CEA1.L trades at £15,677.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CEA1.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs RBTX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 255.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while RBTX.L trades at £1,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check RBTX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 252B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,981.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CPJ1.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs ISPY.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 245.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while ISPY.L trades at £2,294.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check ISPY.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SUES.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 244.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SUES.L trades at £635.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SUES.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs JRDE.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 242.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while JRDE.L trades at £3,647.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check JRDE.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs JERE.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 242.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while JERE.L trades at £3,932.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check JERE.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IWFM.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 237.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IWFM.L trades at £6,879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IWFM.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs PHSP.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 221B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while PHSP.L trades at £2,592.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check PHSP.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs HMEF.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 215.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while HMEF.L trades at £928.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check HMEF.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SPGP.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 212.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SPGP.L trades at £1,954.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SPGP.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IUQF.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 204.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IUQF.L trades at £1,159.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IUQF.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XXSC.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 201.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XXSC.L trades at £5,695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XXSC.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XDEV.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 193B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XDEV.L trades at £3,895.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XDEV.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs UIFS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while UIFS.L trades at £1,137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check UIFS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CEUR.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 172.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CEUR.L trades at £31,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CEUR.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SOYU.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 171.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SOYU.L trades at £295.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SOYU.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 164B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,615.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XDEQ.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CU1.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 159.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CU1.L trades at £48,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CU1.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IEFV.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 157.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IEFV.L trades at £904.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IEFV.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs PRIR.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while PRIR.L trades at £1,517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check PRIR.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs GBSP.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while GBSP.L trades at £1,737.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check GBSP.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs ISP6.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while ISP6.L trades at £6,733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check ISP6.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IPRP.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IPRP.L trades at £2,740.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IPRP.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs WATL.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while WATL.L trades at £6,089.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check WATL.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CG1.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 141.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CG1.L trades at £37,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CG1.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs UC79.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 141.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while UC79.L trades at £1,180.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check UC79.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XCX6.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XCX6.L trades at £1,429.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XCX6.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CUS1.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 139.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CUS1.L trades at £40,012.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CUS1.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs GILS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while GILS.L trades at £10,226.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check GILS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CB5.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 130.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CB5.L trades at £4,283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CB5.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs INFL.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while INFL.L trades at £10,148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check INFL.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XDEM.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 126.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XDEM.L trades at £5,790.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XDEM.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XZEU.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XZEU.L trades at £2,791.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XZEU.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IJPN.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 126.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IJPN.L trades at £1,446.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IJPN.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs GSPX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GSPX.L has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while GSPX.L trades at £10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to GSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check GSPX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CSPX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CSPX.L trades at £676.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CSPX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SP5G.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SP5G.L trades at £214.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 66.96. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SP5G.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IGSG.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IGSG.L trades at £6,141.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IGSG.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs H50E.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while H50E.L trades at £4,922.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check H50E.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while 0GWB.IL trades at £479.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check 0GWB.IL's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XRSG.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XRSG.L trades at £24,500.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XRSG.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IWDA.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IWDA.L trades at £119.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IWDA.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IWDG.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IWDG.L has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IWDG.L trades at £1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IWDG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IWDG.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IEUX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IEUX.L trades at £4,029.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IEUX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs JRDM.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while JRDM.L trades at £2,455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check JRDM.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs PRIC.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while PRIC.L trades at £1,672.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check PRIC.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs DAXX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while DAXX.L trades at £19,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check DAXX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs EQSG.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while EQSG.L trades at £5,432.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check EQSG.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while XLKQ.L trades at £58,895.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check XLKQ.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs WQDS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while WQDS.L trades at £567.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check WQDS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CSCA.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CSCA.L trades at £18,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CSCA.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs COMM.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while COMM.L trades at £539.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check COMM.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs TRXS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while TRXS.L trades at £3,407.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check TRXS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IUKD.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IUKD.L trades at £860.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IUKD.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,535.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check PRIJ.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs MTIX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while MTIX.L trades at £14,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check MTIX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs UB45.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while UB45.L trades at £6,284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check UB45.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IMV.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IMV.L trades at £5,758.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IMV.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IGUS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IGUS.L trades at £14,479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IGUS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs RIEG.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while RIEG.L trades at £1,448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check RIEG.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs INAA.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while INAA.L trades at £8,823.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check INAA.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs EQDS.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while EQDS.L trades at £547.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check EQDS.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CSP1.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CSP1.L trades at £50,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L and CSP1.L have similar daily volatility (0.72).Check CSP1.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SPEX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SPEX.L trades at £4,635.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SPEX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs SPES.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while SPES.L trades at £4,360.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check SPES.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs CRPX.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while CRPX.L trades at £13,444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check CRPX.L's competition here
XNAQ.L vs IDVY.L Comparison August 2025
XNAQ.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XNAQ.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XNAQ.L is priced at £40.21, while IDVY.L trades at £1,938.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XNAQ.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XNAQ.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XNAQ.L is less volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XNAQ.L.Check IDVY.L's competition here