Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VOO trades at $570.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VFINX trades at $574.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VITSX trades at $148.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTSAX trades at $148.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 661.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while FXAIX trades at $216.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 638.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTI trades at $305.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 602.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while IVV trades at $623.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 573.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while SPY trades at $620.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 509.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTSNX trades at $148.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 502.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VXUS trades at $69.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 354.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VMCPX trades at $380.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 325.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VIMAX trades at $349.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 314.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VINIX trades at $506.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 314.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VIIIX trades at $506.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 291B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RGAGX trades at $82.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 290.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while GAFFX trades at $82.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 290.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AGTHX trades at $81.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 287.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while GFAFX trades at $81.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 257.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RGABX trades at $72.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 253.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RGAAX trades at $71.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 248.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while ABALX trades at $36.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 247.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while GFACX trades at $69.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 246.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while BALFX trades at $36.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 242.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RLBGX trades at $36.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AMBFX trades at $36.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AFMBX trades at $36.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 233.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VDIPX trades at $28.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 228.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VEA trades at $57.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 226.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTMNX trades at $18.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 218.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while QQQ trades at $550.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 214.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VB trades at $241.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 196B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTV trades at $178.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VO trades at $282.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while BX trades at $153.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 47.01. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 167.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while BLK trades at $1,070.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 163.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RICBX trades at $62.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 162.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while FCNTX trades at $23.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 162.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AICFX trades at $62.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 162.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RICAX trades at $62.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while FCTDX trades at $18.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 159.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while C-PN trades at $30.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while FCNKX trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AICCX trades at $62.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AIVSX trades at $63.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while FNPFX trades at $69.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RNPGX trades at $69.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while NPFFX trades at $69.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AFIFX trades at $87.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while ANCFX trades at $87.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while ANWPX trades at $69.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while CFNAX trades at $87.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AWSHX trades at $64.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RWMFX trades at $64.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while FWMIX trades at $64.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while CWMAX trades at $63.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 143.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while WSHFX trades at $63.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while WSHCX trades at $62.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RWMBX trades at $62.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while IEFA trades at $83.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RERGX trades at $60.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AEPGX trades at $60.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AEGFX trades at $60.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RERHX trades at $60.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AEPFX trades at $60.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AGG trades at $98.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 125.60. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while KKR trades at $134.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 59.74. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while IWF trades at $423.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VWELX trades at $45.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VWENX trades at $78.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while SEEGX trades at $84.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while JLGRX trades at $87.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while NAESX trades at $115.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VSCIX trades at $115.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VIG trades at $206.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while JLGMX trades at $88.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VUG trades at $437.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VGT trades at $664.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTTHX trades at $26.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while FSKAX trades at $171.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while BN trades at $62.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 221.38. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VDADX trades at $56.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VITAX trades at $340.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while TBCIX trades at $201.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while TRBCX trades at $199.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTHRX trades at $40.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while IJH trades at $63.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VTIVX trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VFORX trades at $47.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while PABGX trades at $192.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 38.15. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while DODGX trades at $273.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while BAM trades at $55.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VIEIX trades at $148.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RRBGX trades at $179.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while RAFFX trades at $45.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while VEMAX trades at $41.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while PRUFX trades at $111.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while PRGFX trades at $110.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 39.56. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AMCPX trades at $44.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.

XLV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XLV stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, XLV is priced at $135.36, while AMPFX trades at $43.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XLV currently has a P/E ratio of 24.05, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, XLV's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XLV is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLV.