SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF XES Peers
See (XES) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XES | $63.68 | -0.69% | 1.3B | 12.29 | $5.19 | +2.05% |
| VFINX | $571.30 | +1.34% | 1.5T | 26.76 | $21.24 | +1.23% |
| VOO | $566.95 | +0.50% | 1.5T | 26.90 | $21.07 | +1.23% |
| VITSX | $147.69 | +1.35% | 1.2T | 26.00 | $5.65 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $147.67 | +1.36% | 1.2T | 26.01 | $5.65 | +1.23% |
| FXAIX | $214.98 | +1.33% | 652.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTI | $303.31 | +0.45% | 628.9B | 26.13 | $11.61 | +1.24% |
| IVV | $617.46 | +0.44% | 592.1B | 26.57 | $23.24 | +1.30% |
| SPY | $614.91 | +0.50% | 564.2B | 26.57 | $23.13 | +1.17% |
| VTSNX | $148.05 | +1.49% | 504.5B | 16.42 | $8.97 | +2.84% |
Stock Comparison
XES vs VFINX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VFINX trades at $571.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VOO Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VOO trades at $566.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VITSX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VITSX trades at $147.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTSAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTSAX trades at $147.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs FXAIX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 652.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while FXAIX trades at $214.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTI Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 628.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTI trades at $303.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs IVV Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 592.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while IVV trades at $617.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs SPY Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 564.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while SPY trades at $614.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTSNX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 504.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTSNX trades at $148.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VXUS Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 498.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VXUS trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VMCPX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 349.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VMCPX trades at $376.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VIMAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 320.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VIMAX trades at $345.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VINIX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 310B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VINIX trades at $501.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VIIIX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 309.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VIIIX trades at $501.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RGAGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 287.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RGAGX trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs GAFFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 287.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while GAFFX trades at $81.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AGTHX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 287.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AGTHX trades at $81.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs GFAFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 284.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while GFAFX trades at $80.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RGABX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 255.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RGABX trades at $72.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RGAAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RGAAX trades at $71.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AMBFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 246.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AMBFX trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs ABALX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 246.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while ABALX trades at $36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AFMBX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 246.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AFMBX trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs BALFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 245B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while BALFX trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs GFACX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 245B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while GFACX trades at $69.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RLBGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RLBGX trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VDIPX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 230.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VDIPX trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTMNX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 227.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTMNX trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VEA Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 226.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VEA trades at $56.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs QQQ Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 215.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while QQQ trades at $548.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VB Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VB trades at $237.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTV Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTV trades at $176.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VO Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 189.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VO trades at $279.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs BX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while BX trades at $151.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 45.79. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs FCNTX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 162.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while FCNTX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs BLK Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 162.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while BLK trades at $1,047.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AIVSX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 162B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AIVSX trades at $62.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RICBX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 162B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RICBX trades at $62.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AICFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 160.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AICFX trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RICAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 160.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RICAX trades at $61.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs FCNKX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 158.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while FCNKX trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs FCTDX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 158.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while FCTDX trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AICCX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AICCX trades at $61.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs FNPFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while FNPFX trades at $69.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RNPGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RNPGX trades at $69.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs NPFFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while NPFFX trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs ANWPX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while ANWPX trades at $69.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs C-PN Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while C-PN trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AFIFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AFIFX trades at $87.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs ANCFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while ANCFX trades at $87.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs CFNAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 145.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while CFNAX trades at $87.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AWSHX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AWSHX trades at $63.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RWMFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RWMFX trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs FWMIX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while FWMIX trades at $63.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs CWMAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 141.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while CWMAX trades at $63.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs WSHFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while WSHFX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs IEFA Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while IEFA trades at $83.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs WSHCX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while WSHCX trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RWMBX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 138.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RWMBX trades at $62.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RERGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RERGX trades at $60.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AEPGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AEPGX trades at $60.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AEPFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AEPFX trades at $60.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AEGFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AEGFX trades at $60.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RERHX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RERHX trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AGG Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AGG trades at $98.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 126.02. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs KKR Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while KKR trades at $134.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 57.90. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs IWF Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while IWF trades at $421.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VWELX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VWELX trades at $45.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VWENX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VWENX trades at $77.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs SEEGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while SEEGX trades at $84.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs JLGRX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while JLGRX trades at $87.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VSCIX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VSCIX trades at $113.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs NAESX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while NAESX trades at $113.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTTHX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTTHX trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs FSKAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while FSKAX trades at $169.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs JLGMX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while JLGMX trades at $88.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VDADX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VDADX trades at $55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VIG Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VIG trades at $203.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VUG Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VUG trades at $436.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VGT Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VGT trades at $656.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VITAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VITAX trades at $336.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 38.68. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs BN Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while BN trades at $61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 212.45. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTHRX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTHRX trades at $40.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs TBCIX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while TBCIX trades at $200.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs TRBCX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while TRBCX trades at $199.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VFORX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VFORX trades at $46.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VTIVX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VTIVX trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs PABGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while PABGX trades at $192.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs IJH Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while IJH trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs DODGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while DODGX trades at $270.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RRBGX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RRBGX trades at $179.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs BAM Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while BAM trades at $55.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VIEIX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VIEIX trades at $145.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs RAFFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while RAFFX trades at $45.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs VEMAX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while VEMAX trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs PRUFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while PRUFX trades at $111.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs PRGFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while PRGFX trades at $110.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 39.24. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AMCPX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AMCPX trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.
XES vs AMPFX Comparison
XES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XES stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XES is priced at $63.68, while AMPFX trades at $43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XES currently has a P/E ratio of 12.29, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, XES's ROE is N/A, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XES is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XES.