Goldmoney Inc.
Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XAU.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAU.TO | CA$8.62 | +2.50% | 109M | 7.98 | CA$1.08 | N/A |
| GS.NE | CA$34.82 | -1.64% | 305.6B | 15.27 | CA$2.28 | +1.70% |
| GLXY.TO | CA$37.08 | -5.65% | 14.3B | 48.80 | CA$0.76 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | CA$27.30 | -7.24% | 3.1B | -30.00 | -CA$0.91 | N/A |
| DEFI.NE | CA$3.71 | +0.27% | 1.2B | 72.80 | CA$0.05 | N/A |
| CF-PC.TO | CA$23.50 | -0.21% | 1.1B | 10.88 | CA$2.16 | +3.25% |
| CF.TO | CA$10.49 | -2.51% | 1.1B | -34.97 | -CA$0.30 | +3.25% |
| BITF.TO | CA$1.62 | -7.43% | 903.2M | -6.48 | -CA$0.25 | N/A |
| HODL.CN | CA$1.21 | -1.63% | 200.9M | 121.00 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| PNP.TO | CA$15.68 | +1.42% | 147.2M | 4.72 | CA$3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
XAU.TO vs GS.NE Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 305.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while GS.NE trades at CA$34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check GS.NE's competition here
XAU.TO vs GLXY.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while GLXY.TO trades at CA$37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check GLXY.TO's competition here
XAU.TO vs HUT.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while HUT.TO trades at CA$27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check HUT.TO's competition here
XAU.TO vs DEFI.NE Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while DEFI.NE trades at CA$3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check DEFI.NE's competition here
XAU.TO vs CF-PC.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while CF-PC.TO trades at CA$23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check CF-PC.TO's competition here
XAU.TO vs CF.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while CF.TO trades at CA$10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -34.97. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check CF.TO's competition here
XAU.TO vs BITF.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while BITF.TO trades at CA$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check BITF.TO's competition here
XAU.TO vs HODL.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while HODL.CN trades at CA$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check HODL.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs PNP.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while PNP.TO trades at CA$15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check PNP.TO's competition here
XAU.TO vs RICH.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while RICH.CN trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to RICH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check RICH.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs CXI.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while CXI.TO trades at CA$19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check CXI.TO's competition here
XAU.TO vs BIGG.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while BIGG.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check BIGG.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs SIX.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, SIX.CN has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while SIX.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to SIX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check SIX.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs FRNT.V Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while FRNT.V trades at CA$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check FRNT.V's competition here
XAU.TO vs HOLD.NE Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while HOLD.NE trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check HOLD.NE's competition here
XAU.TO vs DIGI.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, DIGI.CN has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while DIGI.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas DIGI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DIGI.CN's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to DIGI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check DIGI.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs BTC.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while BTC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -8.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check BTC.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs SPIR.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while SPIR.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +10.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is less volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check SPIR.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs ARM.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while ARM.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to ARM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check ARM.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs CODE.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while CODE.CN trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to CODE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check CODE.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs GBC.CN Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while GBC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to GBC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check GBC.CN's competition here
XAU.TO vs FXC.TO Comparison August 2025
XAU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XAU.TO stands at 109M. In comparison, FXC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XAU.TO is priced at CA$8.62, while FXC.TO trades at CA$5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.98, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, XAU.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XAU.TO is more volatile compared to FXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XAU.TO.Check FXC.TO's competition here