Wyld Networks AB (publ)
Wyld Networks AB (publ) (WYLDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WYLDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WYLDF | $0.16 | +1216.91% | 136M | -7.75 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| FJTSF | $22.16 | -3.34% | 43.7B | 31.90 | $0.77 | +0.89% |
| NTTDF | $29.51 | +10.24% | 41.4B | 42.77 | $0.69 | +0.58% |
| FJTSY | $22.20 | +1.09% | 39.9B | 28.82 | $0.77 | +0.47% |
| NTDTY | $26.98 | -1.26% | 37.8B | 39.68 | $0.68 | N/A |
| NIPNF | $27.85 | +1.59% | 37.1B | 31.29 | $0.89 | +0.67% |
| CAPMF | $154.01 | -1.22% | 27.5B | 14.71 | $11.01 | +2.44% |
| CGEMY | $31.50 | -0.51% | 27.1B | 14.22 | $2.22 | +2.37% |
| NURAF | $37.61 | +6.17% | 22.5B | 35.80 | $1.10 | +1.09% |
| NRILY | $37.33 | +1.08% | 21.6B | 33.63 | $1.11 | +0.70% |
Stock Comparison
WYLDF vs FJTSF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while FJTSF trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check FJTSF's competition here
WYLDF vs NTTDF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NTTDF trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NTTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTTDF's competition here
WYLDF vs FJTSY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while FJTSY trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check FJTSY's competition here
WYLDF vs NTDTY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NTDTY trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NTDTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTDTY's competition here
WYLDF vs NIPNF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NIPNF trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NIPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIPNF's competition here
WYLDF vs CAPMF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CAPMF trades at $154.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CAPMF's competition here
WYLDF vs CGEMY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CGEMY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CGEMY's competition here
WYLDF vs NURAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NURAF trades at $37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NURAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NURAF's competition here
WYLDF vs NRILY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NRILY trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check NRILY's competition here
WYLDF vs WIZEY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while WIZEY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check WIZEY's competition here
WYLDF vs WPLCF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while WPLCF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check WPLCF's competition here
WYLDF vs ISMAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ISMAF trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and ISMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISMAF's competition here
WYLDF vs TISNF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while TISNF trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and TISNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TISNF's competition here
WYLDF vs RPYTF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check RPYTF's competition here
WYLDF vs DUSXF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check DUSXF's competition here
WYLDF vs BECTY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while BECTY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check BECTY's competition here
WYLDF vs BHTLF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while BHTLF trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check BHTLF's competition here
WYLDF vs TSYHY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while TSYHY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check TSYHY's competition here
WYLDF vs TSYHF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while TSYHF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check TSYHF's competition here
WYLDF vs CTLPP Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CTLPP trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1993.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CTLPP's competition here
WYLDF vs SPSAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SPSAF trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check SPSAF's competition here
WYLDF vs ISMAY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ISMAY trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check ISMAY's competition here
WYLDF vs AEXAY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while AEXAY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and AEXAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEXAY's competition here
WYLDF vs NWITY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check NWITY's competition here
WYLDF vs NWKLF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NWKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWKLF's competition here
WYLDF vs NSSXF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NSSXF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NSSXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSSXF's competition here
WYLDF vs NCRRP Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check NCRRP's competition here
WYLDF vs SLNTY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and SLNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLNTY's competition here
WYLDF vs NTCYF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NTCYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTCYF's competition here
WYLDF vs HLTEF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while HLTEF trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and HLTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTEF's competition here
WYLDF vs NDTAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NDTAF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check NDTAF's competition here
WYLDF vs SESPF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SESPF trades at $121.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and SESPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SESPF's competition here
WYLDF vs CFTLF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CFTLF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and CFTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFTLF's competition here
WYLDF vs ATEAY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ATEAY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and ATEAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATEAY's competition here
WYLDF vs DLGEF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DLGEF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is -29.43. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DLGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLGEF's competition here
WYLDF vs ATAZF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and ATAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATAZF's competition here
WYLDF vs CRAYF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CRAYF trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 49.46. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and CRAYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRAYF's competition here
WYLDF vs CCCMF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and CCCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCCMF's competition here
WYLDF vs DTSOF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DTSOF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DTSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTSOF's competition here
WYLDF vs KSUEF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and KSUEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSUEF's competition here
WYLDF vs KAHTY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and KAHTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAHTY's competition here
WYLDF vs NGRRF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 882.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NGRRF trades at $67.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check NGRRF's competition here
WYLDF vs ADSGF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and ADSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADSGF's competition here
WYLDF vs CTSDF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CTSDF's competition here
WYLDF vs FDRVF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 770.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and FDRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDRVF's competition here
WYLDF vs TRCLF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and TRCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRCLF's competition here
WYLDF vs DTATF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DTATF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DTATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTATF's competition here
WYLDF vs AEXAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 616.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while AEXAF trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and AEXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEXAF's competition here
WYLDF vs DCHIF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DCHIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DCHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCHIF's competition here
WYLDF vs GBDMF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and GBDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBDMF's competition here
WYLDF vs CMTUF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CMTUF's competition here
WYLDF vs DTTLY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DTTLY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DTTLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTTLY's competition here
WYLDF vs CEJOF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CEJOF's competition here
WYLDF vs APMRF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while APMRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and APMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMRF's competition here
WYLDF vs CSYJF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 343.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CSYJF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and CSYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSYJF's competition here
WYLDF vs SLUNF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check SLUNF's competition here
WYLDF vs FDDMF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while FDDMF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and FDDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDDMF's competition here
WYLDF vs SVPLF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and SVPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVPLF's competition here
WYLDF vs EMCHF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 267.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while EMCHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check EMCHF's competition here
WYLDF vs CSYJY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and CSYJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSYJY's competition here
WYLDF vs SSCC Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SSCC trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check SSCC's competition here
WYLDF vs ITFRF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and ITFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITFRF's competition here
WYLDF vs APXYY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while APXYY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check APXYY's competition here
WYLDF vs APPEF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while APPEF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check APPEF's competition here
WYLDF vs ALYAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ALYAF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is 189.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check ALYAF's competition here
WYLDF vs ALVNF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and ALVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALVNF's competition here
WYLDF vs FCCN Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while FCCN trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -33.57. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +8.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check FCCN's competition here
WYLDF vs ULPRF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and ULPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULPRF's competition here
WYLDF vs DCHIY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 121.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DCHIY trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DCHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCHIY's competition here
WYLDF vs GSDT Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while GSDT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and GSDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSDT's competition here
WYLDF vs QUISF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and QUISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QUISF's competition here
WYLDF vs QSCGF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check QSCGF's competition here
WYLDF vs NONEY Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while NONEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and NONEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NONEY's competition here
WYLDF vs KDCXF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and KDCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDCXF's competition here
WYLDF vs EAXR Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while EAXR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and EAXR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EAXR's competition here
WYLDF vs CXGEF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CXGEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CXGEF's competition here
WYLDF vs SEBFF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and SEBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEBFF's competition here
WYLDF vs BNXAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while BNXAF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and BNXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNXAF's competition here
WYLDF vs CNGFF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CNGFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CNGFF's competition here
WYLDF vs HLEO Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while HLEO trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check HLEO's competition here
WYLDF vs SNELF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and SNELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNELF's competition here
WYLDF vs MLBEF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while MLBEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and MLBEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLBEF's competition here
WYLDF vs SPOFF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SPOFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check SPOFF's competition here
WYLDF vs CPIHF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CPIHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CPIHF's competition here
WYLDF vs FUUN Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while FUUN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and FUUN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUUN's competition here
WYLDF vs KTHGF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check KTHGF's competition here
WYLDF vs XTMIF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while XTMIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check XTMIF's competition here
WYLDF vs DRGV Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DRGV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRGV's competition here
WYLDF vs VSSSF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while VSSSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of -4.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check VSSSF's competition here
WYLDF vs KNRLF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and KNRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNRLF's competition here
WYLDF vs DVRNF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DVRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVRNF's competition here
WYLDF vs DCSX Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and DCSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCSX's competition here
WYLDF vs POSAF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while POSAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -3.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and POSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POSAF's competition here
WYLDF vs BRQSF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while BRQSF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check BRQSF's competition here
WYLDF vs SKTCF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and SKTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTCF's competition here
WYLDF vs CRCW Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check CRCW's competition here
WYLDF vs SNOIF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF and SNOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNOIF's competition here
WYLDF vs HWNI Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, HWNI has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while HWNI trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas HWNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to HWNI's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to HWNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check HWNI's competition here
WYLDF vs MOBIF Comparison July 2025
WYLDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYLDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYLDF is priced at $0.16, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYLDF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.75, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WYLDF's ROE is +8.49%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WYLDF is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYLDF.Check MOBIF's competition here