Worley Limited
Worley Limited WYGPY Peers
See (WYGPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WYGPY | $8.08 | -3.46% | 4.3B | 17.57 | $0.46 | +3.65% |
| TNRSF | $17.34 | +5.83% | 18.6B | 10.57 | $1.64 | +4.79% |
| THNPY | $39.34 | +0.14% | 7B | 15.99 | $2.46 | +2.09% |
| THNPF | $38.00 | N/A | 6.6B | 15.38 | $2.47 | +2.22% |
| CHOLF | $0.77 | N/A | 6.6B | 7.70 | $0.10 | +3.83% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | N/A | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +3.90% |
| SUBCY | $17.88 | +0.04% | 5.3B | 27.94 | $0.64 | +4.81% |
| SAPMF | $2.62 | +1.35% | 5.1B | 15.41 | $0.17 | +7.30% |
| ACGYF | $15.93 | N/A | 4.7B | 24.89 | $0.64 | +4.09% |
| AKRYY | $9.00 | -10.00% | 4.3B | 8.26 | $1.09 | +42.68% |
Stock Comparison
WYGPY vs TNRSF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TNRSF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and TNRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs THNPY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while THNPY trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs THNPF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while THNPF trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and THNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs CHOLF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CHOLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs GZPZF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SUBCY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SUBCY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SAPMF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SAPMF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and SAPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs ACGYF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ACGYF trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs AKRYY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while AKRYY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs WYGPF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while WYGPF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SBFFF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SBFFF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and SBFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs SBFFY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SBFFY trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs TRRVF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TRRVF trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 42.97. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs TGSNF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TGSNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and TGSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs CIMEF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CIMEF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs AKRTF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs MDIKF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs CESDF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CESDF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs GZPZY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while GZPZY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs PGEJF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and PGEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs SAWLF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs PSYTF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 710.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PSYTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs TOLWF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 606.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TOLWF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs HNTIY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while HNTIY trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and HNTIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs HNTIF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while HNTIF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and HNTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs SBOEF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs ATONF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 408.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ATONF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SHANF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 395.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SHANF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs ATONY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ATONY trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs AKKVF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs CGGYY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs TOTZF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TOTZF trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs DDHLF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and DDHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs BLYFF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and BLYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs CFWFF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CFWFF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and CFWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs SNVVF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SNVVF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and SNVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs PDER Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PDER trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and PDER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs JUTOY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while JUTOY trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs PKDC Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and PKDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs WFTSF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs POFCY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SCEYF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SCEYF trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs PLSDF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PLSDF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs ETOLF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ETOLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs PRSEF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs MCCRF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while MCCRF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs QSEP Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while QSEP trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs CAWLF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and CAWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs EEYUF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs GWTI Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while GWTI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs POFCF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs NSFDF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while NSFDF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -39.02. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to NSFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs QDRSF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and QDRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs KLNG Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while KLNG trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs BWTX Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs WEIIF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and WEIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs ENGT Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ENGT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs FOYJ Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs TAGP Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TAGP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs HGHAF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while HGHAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to HGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs CGPVF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs OXFCF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and OXFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs BRYFF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while BRYFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs CTNR Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CTNR trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.56. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs NWPIF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and NWPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs GLFH Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SKPO Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 848K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SMGI Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 615.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and SMGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs IRIG Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs FSEI Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SSOF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 140K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and SSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs IESCF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and IESCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs PKDCW Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs GPTC Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs WWNG Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs TXLZF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 24.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and TXLZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs CPYJ Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs SGUJ Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and SGUJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs TEGR Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and TEGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs CSSV Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs AURI Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and AURI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs RTSO Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and RTSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs SUBB Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs TXGE Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and TXGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs LNDT Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and LNDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs CTBG Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and CTBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs BMMCF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs USEI Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and USEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs PTOG Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs AMCF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs CDVIQ Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs POOSF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs EHYD Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and EHYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs SYNE Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 473. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY is less volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WYGPY.
WYGPY vs NNYR Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and NNYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs ALRY Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 117. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and ALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs ISYX Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and ISYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs CHMR Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and CHMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
WYGPY vs ENRFF Comparison
WYGPY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WYGPY stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ENRFF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WYGPY is priced at $8.08, while ENRFF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WYGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ENRFF's P/E ratio is -24.26. In terms of profitability, WYGPY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENRFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WYGPY and ENRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).