Westwing Group SE
Westwing Group SE (WTWGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WTWGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTWGF | $8.56 | +0.00% | 161.1M | -285.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| HSHCY | $12.86 | -0.92% | 31.3B | 10.97 | $1.17 | +3.12% |
| HRSHF | $3.13 | +0.00% | 30.7B | 10.79 | $0.29 | +4.28% |
| QIHCF | $1.95 | +0.00% | 29.3B | 6.72 | $0.29 | +7.13% |
| HWDJY | $52.56 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 22.56 | $2.33 | +2.14% |
| HWDJF | $12.40 | +0.49% | 6.8B | 19.68 | $0.63 | +2.23% |
| SEBYY | $10.12 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 20.65 | $0.49 | +3.16% |
| SEBYF | $93.30 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 32.85 | $2.84 | +3.13% |
| HISEF | $3.00 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 8.33 | $0.36 | N/A |
| RINIY | $11.60 | +0.00% | 3.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WTWGF vs HSHCY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while HSHCY trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check HSHCY's competition here
WTWGF vs HRSHF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, HRSHF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while HRSHF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas HRSHF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HRSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to HRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check HRSHF's competition here
WTWGF vs QIHCF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to QIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check QIHCF's competition here
WTWGF vs HWDJY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check HWDJY's competition here
WTWGF vs HWDJF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while HWDJF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to HWDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check HWDJF's competition here
WTWGF vs SEBYY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while SEBYY trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check SEBYY's competition here
WTWGF vs SEBYF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while SEBYF trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to SEBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check SEBYF's competition here
WTWGF vs HISEF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while HISEF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check HISEF's competition here
WTWGF vs RINIY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while RINIY trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check RINIY's competition here
WTWGF vs RINIF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, RINIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while RINIF trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas RINIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RINIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to RINIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check RINIF's competition here
WTWGF vs BVILF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while BVILF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to BVILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check BVILF's competition here
WTWGF vs BVILY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while BVILY trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check BVILY's competition here
WTWGF vs MAWHY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while MAWHY trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to MAWHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check MAWHY's competition here
WTWGF vs ACKAY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, ACKAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while ACKAY trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas ACKAY's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACKAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to ACKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check ACKAY's competition here
WTWGF vs MAWHF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while MAWHF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check MAWHF's competition here
WTWGF vs ELUXY Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while ELUXY trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is 122.60. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to ELUXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check ELUXY's competition here
WTWGF vs ELRXF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while ELRXF trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is 124.40. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check ELRXF's competition here
WTWGF vs RHUHF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while RHUHF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to RHUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check RHUHF's competition here
WTWGF vs JGLCF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 790.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while JGLCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check JGLCF's competition here
WTWGF vs RYLHF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to RYLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check RYLHF's competition here
WTWGF vs VLBOF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to VLBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check VLBOF's competition here
WTWGF vs CFSKF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 445.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while CFSKF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check CFSKF's competition here
WTWGF vs VCCTF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 132.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while VCCTF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check VCCTF's competition here
WTWGF vs WKGBF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WKGBF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to WKGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check WKGBF's competition here
WTWGF vs DIIBF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while DIIBF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check DIIBF's competition here
WTWGF vs IPGGF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, IPGGF has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while IPGGF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas IPGGF's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPGGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to IPGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check IPGGF's competition here
WTWGF vs RGBD Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while RGBD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check RGBD's competition here
WTWGF vs DGIX Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while DGIX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check DGIX's competition here
WTWGF vs LUVU Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while LUVU trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to LUVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check LUVU's competition here
WTWGF vs KMFI Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, KMFI has a market cap of 197.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while KMFI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas KMFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KMFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to KMFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check KMFI's competition here
WTWGF vs ROWC Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, ROWC has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while ROWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas ROWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROWC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to ROWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check ROWC's competition here
WTWGF vs DIAAF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DIAAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to DIAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check DIAAF's competition here
WTWGF vs DEER Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while DEER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to DEER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check DEER's competition here
WTWGF vs THBD Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while THBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to THBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check THBD's competition here
WTWGF vs PWNX Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while PWNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PWNX's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check PWNX's competition here
WTWGF vs VUOC Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while VUOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to VUOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check VUOC's competition here
WTWGF vs PFWIQ Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to PFWIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check PFWIQ's competition here
WTWGF vs FTDL Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while FTDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to FTDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check FTDL's competition here
WTWGF vs AUVIQ Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to AUVIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check AUVIQ's competition here
WTWGF vs ICPBF Comparison July 2025
WTWGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTWGF stands at 161.1M. In comparison, ICPBF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTWGF is priced at $8.56, while ICPBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -285.33, whereas ICPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTWGF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ICPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTWGF is more volatile compared to ICPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTWGF.Check ICPBF's competition here