WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF WTEM.DE Peers
See (WTEM.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTEM.DE | €36.55 | -0.30% | 1.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00011OE2.F | €273.98 | -0.49% | 269.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JREG.DE | €47.18 | -0.61% | 8.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IQQQ.DE | €63.04 | -0.63% | 2.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.19% |
| EXI2.DE | €86.75 | -0.96% | 2.2B | 27.57 | €3.15 | +0.53% |
| IQQH.DE | €6.85 | +0.72% | 2B | N/A | N/A | +1.30% |
| 10AM.DE | €45.01 | -0.05% | 1.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.98% |
| IQQI.DE | €30.04 | +0.30% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.36% |
| IUSL.DE | €69.55 | -0.50% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JREM.DE | €30.83 | -0.52% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WTEM.DE vs 0P00011OE2.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P00011OE2.F has a market cap of 269.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P00011OE2.F trades at €273.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011OE2.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011OE2.F's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00011OE2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs JREG.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JREG.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while JREG.DE trades at €47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to JREG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs IQQQ.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IQQQ.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while IQQQ.DE trades at €63.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to IQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs EXI2.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EXI2.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while EXI2.DE trades at €86.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXI2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXI2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to EXI2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs IQQH.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IQQH.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while IQQH.DE trades at €6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to IQQH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 10AM.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 10AM.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 10AM.DE trades at €45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 10AM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 10AM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs IQQI.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IQQI.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while IQQI.DE trades at €30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to IQQI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs IUSL.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IUSL.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while IUSL.DE trades at €69.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to IUSL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs JREM.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JREM.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while JREM.DE trades at €30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE and JREM.DE have similar daily volatility (0.52).
WTEM.DE vs PR1W.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PR1W.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while PR1W.DE trades at €36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PR1W.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PR1W.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to PR1W.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs PRAW.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRAW.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while PRAW.DE trades at €31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRAW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to PRAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs ZPRI.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZPRI.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while ZPRI.DE trades at €30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPRI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to ZPRI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs ZPRG.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZPRG.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while ZPRG.DE trades at €30.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPRG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to ZPRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs IQSE.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IQSE.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while IQSE.DE trades at €79.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to IQSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs IQSA.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IQSA.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while IQSA.DE trades at €72.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQSA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to IQSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs SEC0.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SEC0.F has a market cap of 820.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while SEC0.F trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEC0.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEC0.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to SEC0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs V3AL.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, V3AL.F has a market cap of 813.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while V3AL.F trades at €4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to V3AL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs DXSB.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DXSB.DE has a market cap of 705.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while DXSB.DE trades at €29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXSB.DE's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXSB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to DXSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs WMIN.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WMIN.DE has a market cap of 654.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while WMIN.DE trades at €33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WMIN.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to WMIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 10AJ.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 10AJ.DE has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 10AJ.DE trades at €50.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AJ.DE's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 10AJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to 10AJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs ETLQ.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ETLQ.DE has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while ETLQ.DE trades at €19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETLQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETLQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to ETLQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs DX2E.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DX2E.DE has a market cap of 284.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while DX2E.DE trades at €60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX2E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DX2E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to DX2E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs WELJ.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WELJ.DE has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while WELJ.DE trades at €12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELJ.DE's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WELJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to WELJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs GGUE.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GGUE.DE has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while GGUE.DE trades at €24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to GGUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs UDIV.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UDIV.F has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while UDIV.F trades at €8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIV.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UDIV.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to UDIV.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs XU61.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XU61.DE has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while XU61.DE trades at €81.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XU61.DE's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XU61.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to XU61.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs JPGL.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPGL.DE has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while JPGL.DE trades at €36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPGL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPGL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to JPGL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs WELN.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WELN.DE has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while WELN.DE trades at €10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELN.DE's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WELN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to WELN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs PR1G.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PR1G.DE has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while PR1G.DE trades at €16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PR1G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PR1G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to PR1G.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs PRAG.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRAG.DE has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while PRAG.DE trades at €17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRAG.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to PRAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs FLXX.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLXX.DE has a market cap of 107.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while FLXX.DE trades at €32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to FLXX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs ZZRG.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZZRG.F has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while ZZRG.F trades at €25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZZRG.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZZRG.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to ZZRG.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs VVGM.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VVGM.F has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while VVGM.F trades at €23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVGM.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVGM.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to VVGM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs BBCK.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BBCK.DE has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while BBCK.DE trades at €53.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBCK.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBCK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to BBCK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs SLVR.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SLVR.F has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while SLVR.F trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVR.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLVR.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to SLVR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs VOOM.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VOOM.DE has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while VOOM.DE trades at €15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOOM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOOM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to VOOM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs SM8T.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SM8T.DE has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while SM8T.DE trades at €670.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SM8T.DE's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SM8T.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to SM8T.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs FLXG.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLXG.DE has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while FLXG.DE trades at €34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to FLXG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs G1CE.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, G1CE.DE has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while G1CE.DE trades at €15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G1CE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to G1CE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to G1CE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P000015J7.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P000015J7.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P000015J7.F trades at €37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000015J7.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000015J7.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P000015J7.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 4UBR.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 4UBR.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 4UBR.F trades at €10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4UBR.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 4UBR.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 4UBR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P0000VHNS.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0000VHNS.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P0000VHNS.F trades at €19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000VHNS.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000VHNS.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P0000VHNS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs DNRA.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DNRA.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while DNRA.DE trades at €88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNRA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNRA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to DNRA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P0000PTZO.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0000PTZO.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P0000PTZO.F trades at €344.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000PTZO.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000PTZO.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P0000PTZO.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs LYPB.DE Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LYPB.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while LYPB.DE trades at €396.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPB.DE's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is less volatile compared to LYPB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P00000RQC.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P00000RQC.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P00000RQC.F trades at €50.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000RQC.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000RQC.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000RQC.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P00011HBM.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P00011HBM.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P00011HBM.F trades at €361.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011HBM.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011HBM.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00011HBM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P00015OFP.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P00015OFP.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P00015OFP.F trades at €53.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00015OFP.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00015OFP.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00015OFP.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs ASRS.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ASRS.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while ASRS.F trades at €9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASRS.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASRS.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to ASRS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P00012I66.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P00012I66.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P00012I66.F trades at €349.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00012I66.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00012I66.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00012I66.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P00000WLG.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P00000WLG.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P00000WLG.F trades at €51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000WLG.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000WLG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000WLG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P0001CXIY.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0001CXIY.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P0001CXIY.F trades at €150.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001CXIY.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001CXIY.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P0001CXIY.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P0000XR9M.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0000XR9M.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P0000XR9M.F trades at €336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000XR9M.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000XR9M.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P0000XR9M.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.
WTEM.DE vs 0P0000IRFW.F Comparison
WTEM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTEM.DE stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0000IRFW.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTEM.DE is priced at €36.55, while 0P0000IRFW.F trades at €612.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTEM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000IRFW.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTEM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000IRFW.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTEM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P0000IRFW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTEM.DE.