Wärtsilä Oyj Abp

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 295.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while RCIT trades at $2,262.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -226250.00. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check RCIT's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 229.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMAWF trades at $278.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMAWF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SIEGY trades at $141.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SIEGY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 172B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SBGSF trades at $305.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SBGSF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 171.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SBGSY trades at $61.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SBGSY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMERY has a market cap of 168.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMERY trades at $194.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMERY's P/E ratio is 76.63. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMERY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SMERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMERY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMEGF trades at $194.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 76.86. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMEGF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMNEY trades at $193.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 101.55. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMNEY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while MHVYF trades at $32.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 60.40. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check MHVYF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while ATLPF trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check ATLPF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while ATLKY trades at $21.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check ATLKY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while ATLCY trades at $18.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check ATLCY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while ATLFF trades at $16.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check ATLFF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while KNYJY trades at $37.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check KNYJY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AMDLY has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while AMDLY trades at $47.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas AMDLY's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMDLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to AMDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check AMDLY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SDVKF trades at $42.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SDVKF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SDVKY trades at $42.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SDVKY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SHLAF trades at $410.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 34.02. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SHLAF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while WEGZY trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check WEGZY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SHLRF trades at $362.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SHLRF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while FANUF trades at $39.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check FANUF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while FANUY trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check FANUY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while KNYJF trades at $70.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check KNYJF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while WEICF trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check WEICF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMCAY trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMCAY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while IHICY trades at $28.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check IHICY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMECF trades at $477.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMECF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while IHICF trades at $27.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check IHICF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while WRTBF trades at $43.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check WRTBF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while VWSYF trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check VWSYF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while VWDRY trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check VWDRY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while ALFVY trades at $58.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check ALFVY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while ALFVF trades at $58.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check ALFVF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while VACNY trades at $67.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 69.03. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check VACNY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while KWHIY trades at $46.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check KWHIY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while KWHIF trades at $109.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check KWHIF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while EBCOF trades at $38.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check EBCOF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while EBCOY trades at $18.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check EBCOY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while NNDNF trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check NNDNF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while DAIUF trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check DAIUF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while DFKCY trades at $20.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check DFKCY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while NJDCY trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check NJDCY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while DNGFF trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check DNGFF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while WEICY trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check WEICY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while VTTGF trades at $463.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check VTTGF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check GCTAF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check GCTAY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while GEAGF trades at $77.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check GEAGF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while WEGRY trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check WEGRY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while WEIGF trades at $46.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check WEIGF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while MLSPF trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check MLSPF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMGZY trades at $37.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMGZY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SMGKF trades at $35.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SMGKF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while RTLLF trades at $869.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check RTLLF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while NRDXF trades at $40.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 75.91. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check NRDXF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while NRXXY trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 75.56. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check NRXXY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SIELF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 60.78. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SIELF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while RATIY trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check RATIY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while YOKEY trades at $69.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check YOKEY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while TBABF trades at $37.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check TBABF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while YOKEF trades at $33.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check YOKEF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while IMIAF trades at $34.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check IMIAF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while XJNGF trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check XJNGF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SPXSY trades at $52.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SPXSY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SPXSF trades at $105.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SPXSF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SULZF trades at $219.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SULZF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while NGKIF trades at $23.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check NGKIF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while VLMTY trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check VLMTY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while FCHRF trades at $75.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check FCHRF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while VOYJF trades at $32.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check VOYJF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while FLUIF trades at $30.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check FLUIF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while AMDWF trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check AMDWF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while FLIDF trades at $93.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check FLIDF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while FLIDY trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check FLIDY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while JPSWY trades at $34.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check JPSWY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while HSHIF trades at $34.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check HSHIF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while HSHZY trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check HSHZY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while BCHHF trades at $444.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check BCHHF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while YMATF trades at $8.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check YMATF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SOHVY trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SOHVY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while HAIIF trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check HAIIF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SFSLF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while AALBF trades at $40.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check AALBF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check KRNNF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while CYJBF trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check CYJBF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while MICLF trades at $21.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check MICLF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check ATSAF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while RTOXF trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check RTOXF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, CYJBY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while CYJBY trades at $29.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas CYJBY's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYJBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to CYJBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check CYJBY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while NCTKY trades at $15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 46.80. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check NCTKY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while THKLY trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THKLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check THKLY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while SOHVF trades at $29.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check SOHVF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check MRRLF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while THKLF trades at $31.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 53.20. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THKLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check THKLF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while JGHAF trades at $33.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check JGHAF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while NCTKF trades at $27.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to NCTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check NCTKF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check KUKAF's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while FJTCY trades at $35.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is more volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check FJTCY's competition here

WRTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WRTBY stands at 127.5B. In comparison, HSYDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRTBY is priced at $8.80, while HSYDF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WRTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 34.68, whereas HSYDF's P/E ratio is 91.77. In terms of profitability, WRTBY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSYDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRTBY is less volatile compared to HSYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRTBY.Check HSYDF's competition here