Worldline SA
Worldline SA (WRDLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WRDLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRDLY | $2.15 | +1.42% | 1.2B | -3.47 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,856.00 | +3.98% | 58.5B | 53.97 | $34.39 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $18.33 | +1.61% | 57.7B | 52.31 | $0.35 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $65.00 | +0.00% | 49B | 15.78 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +4.11% |
| TOITF | $139.16 | +3.13% | 11.6B | 100.84 | $1.38 | N/A |
| TMICY | $64.26 | +0.56% | 8.7B | 39.69 | $1.65 | +1.45% |
| TMICF | $65.49 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 38.98 | $1.68 | +3.57% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.76% |
| NEXXY | $6.06 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 37.88 | $0.16 | +4.67% |
Stock Comparison
WRDLY vs ADYYF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while ADYYF trades at $1,856.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 53.97. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check ADYYF's competition here
WRDLY vs ADYEY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while ADYEY trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 52.31. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check ADYEY's competition here
WRDLY vs BSQKZ Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while BSQKZ trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and BSQKZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSQKZ's competition here
WRDLY vs KAKZF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and KAKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAKZF's competition here
WRDLY vs TOITF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TOITF trades at $139.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 100.84. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check TOITF's competition here
WRDLY vs TMICY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TMICY trades at $64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check TMICY's competition here
WRDLY vs TMICF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TMICF trades at $65.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and TMICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMICF's competition here
WRDLY vs NEXPF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check NEXPF's competition here
WRDLY vs NEXXY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while NEXXY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check NEXXY's competition here
WRDLY vs DRKTY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and DRKTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTY's competition here
WRDLY vs GMYTF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and GMYTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMYTF's competition here
WRDLY vs SWDAF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SWDAF's competition here
WRDLY vs STWRY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and STWRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STWRY's competition here
WRDLY vs CIOXY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check CIOXY's competition here
WRDLY vs EXNWF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and EXNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXNWF's competition here
WRDLY vs OVHFF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while OVHFF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 144.67. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and OVHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OVHFF's competition here
WRDLY vs DRKTF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and DRKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTF's competition here
WRDLY vs SPNUF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SPNUF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and SPNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPNUF's competition here
WRDLY vs WWLNF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while WWLNF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check WWLNF's competition here
WRDLY vs SANP Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SANP's competition here
WRDLY vs MGPPF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while MGPPF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.67. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check MGPPF's competition here
WRDLY vs PHPYF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and PHPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHPYF's competition here
WRDLY vs YHEKF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 896.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while YHEKF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check YHEKF's competition here
WRDLY vs CPLFF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and CPLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPLFF's competition here
WRDLY vs FMZNF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 681.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FMZNF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and FMZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMZNF's competition here
WRDLY vs FNCHF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FNCHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check FNCHF's competition here
WRDLY vs PRTHU Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 618.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check PRTHU's competition here
WRDLY vs PYPTF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 553.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check PYPTF's competition here
WRDLY vs DYNDF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 452.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DYNDF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check DYNDF's competition here
WRDLY vs TDCSF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and TDCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDCSF's competition here
WRDLY vs SPMYY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SPMYY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SPMYY's competition here
WRDLY vs NFONF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and NFONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFONF's competition here
WRDLY vs CORZQ Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check CORZQ's competition here
WRDLY vs TYPMF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check TYPMF's competition here
WRDLY vs FFPP Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FFPP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check FFPP's competition here
WRDLY vs OTPMF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and OTPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTPMF's competition here
WRDLY vs ABANF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and ABANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABANF's competition here
WRDLY vs SERKF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SERKF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and SERKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SERKF's competition here
WRDLY vs SEEMF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 205.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and SEEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEEMF's competition here
WRDLY vs HISNF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while HISNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check HISNF's competition here
WRDLY vs FSOYF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check FSOYF's competition here
WRDLY vs ERDLF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while ERDLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and ERDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERDLF's competition here
WRDLY vs GIVXF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and GIVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIVXF's competition here
WRDLY vs CGAAY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and CGAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGAAY's competition here
WRDLY vs PYFRF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and PYFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYFRF's competition here
WRDLY vs FCLOF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and FCLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCLOF's competition here
WRDLY vs HAIVF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while HAIVF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check HAIVF's competition here
WRDLY vs BGOPF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while BGOPF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check BGOPF's competition here
WRDLY vs DGGXF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DGGXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check DGGXF's competition here
WRDLY vs VRSSF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while VRSSF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check VRSSF's competition here
WRDLY vs CROTF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and CROTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CROTF's competition here
WRDLY vs JGHG Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and JGHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHG's competition here
WRDLY vs WHEN Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check WHEN's competition here
WRDLY vs QBITF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and QBITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBITF's competition here
WRDLY vs NTTCF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and NTTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTTCF's competition here
WRDLY vs NOWVF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while NOWVF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check NOWVF's competition here
WRDLY vs APGT Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check APGT's competition here
WRDLY vs CORZR Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CORZR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and CORZR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CORZR's competition here
WRDLY vs ISDCF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check ISDCF's competition here
WRDLY vs SKKY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SKKY trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SKKY's competition here
WRDLY vs SDCH Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SDCH trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SDCH's competition here
WRDLY vs TFLM Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +23.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check TFLM's competition here
WRDLY vs POTTF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and POTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POTTF's competition here
WRDLY vs CLOQ Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CLOQ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and CLOQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLOQ's competition here
WRDLY vs FOBIF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FOBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check FOBIF's competition here
WRDLY vs PLCKF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while PLCKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +10.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check PLCKF's competition here
WRDLY vs CLPMF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CLPMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check CLPMF's competition here
WRDLY vs CYBNY Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and CYBNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBNY's competition here
WRDLY vs QFEEF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and QFEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QFEEF's competition here
WRDLY vs EPXGF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and EPXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPXGF's competition here
WRDLY vs DRKOF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check DRKOF's competition here
WRDLY vs ATCHW Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while ATCHW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and ATCHW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATCHW's competition here
WRDLY vs DLTXF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and DLTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLTXF's competition here
WRDLY vs DSAIF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check DSAIF's competition here
WRDLY vs IPNFF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check IPNFF's competition here
WRDLY vs SFIIF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SFIIF's competition here
WRDLY vs NBVAF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while NBVAF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and NBVAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBVAF's competition here
WRDLY vs DVPNF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and DVPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVPNF's competition here
WRDLY vs RKNEF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while RKNEF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check RKNEF's competition here
WRDLY vs VENZF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and VENZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VENZF's competition here
WRDLY vs OVTZ Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check OVTZ's competition here
WRDLY vs PKKFF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while PKKFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check PKKFF's competition here
WRDLY vs PKLBF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and PKLBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKLBF's competition here
WRDLY vs TGCB Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TGCB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and TGCB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGCB's competition here
WRDLY vs MODGF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and MODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MODGF's competition here
WRDLY vs RIHT Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check RIHT's competition here
WRDLY vs SCYRF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SCYRF's competition here
WRDLY vs MBLMF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and MBLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBLMF's competition here
WRDLY vs VISM Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check VISM's competition here
WRDLY vs KCRD Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while KCRD trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check KCRD's competition here
WRDLY vs TONR Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check TONR's competition here
WRDLY vs RCWDF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and RCWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCWDF's competition here
WRDLY vs FUAPF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 819.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check FUAPF's competition here
WRDLY vs INOTF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771K. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check INOTF's competition here
WRDLY vs INAR Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and INAR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INAR's competition here
WRDLY vs MKTDF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 728.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while MKTDF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +220.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to MKTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check MKTDF's competition here
WRDLY vs ITNF Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 693.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while ITNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check ITNF's competition here
WRDLY vs FSRDQ Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY and FSRDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSRDQ's competition here
WRDLY vs SMKG Comparison July 2025
WRDLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRDLY stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 670.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WRDLY is priced at $2.15, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRDLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRDLY's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WRDLY is less volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRDLY.Check SMKG's competition here