W. R. Berkley Corporation 5.70% SB DB 2058
W. R. Berkley Corporation 5.70% SB DB 2058 WRB-PE Peers
See (WRB-PE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRB-PE | $21.67 | -0.12% | 27.47B | 4.71 | $4.60 | +2.41% |
| PGR | $282.60 | +0.84% | 165.67B | 19.06 | $14.83 | +1.73% |
| CB | $285.32 | -1.49% | 114.34B | 13.74 | $20.77 | +1.27% |
| TRV | $264.94 | -1.16% | 60.03B | 14.43 | $18.36 | +1.58% |
| ALL-PH | $20.72 | +0.68% | 54.03B | 3.39 | $6.11 | +1.85% |
| ALL-PB | $25.49 | +0.06% | 53.69B | 2.12 | $12.04 | +1.85% |
| ALL | $202.53 | +0.02% | 53.63B | 13.84 | $14.63 | +1.85% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | N/A | 32.10B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.85% |
| WRB-PG | $16.32 | -0.37% | 27.39B | N/A | N/A | +2.41% |
| WRB-PF | $19.46 | -0.46% | 27.37B | N/A | N/A | +2.41% |
Stock Comparison
WRB-PE vs PGR Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 165.67B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while PGR trades at $282.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs CB Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 114.34B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while CB trades at $285.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs TRV Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 60.03B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while TRV trades at $264.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ALL-PH Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 54.03B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ALL-PH trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ALL-PB Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.69B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ALL-PB trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ALL Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ALL trades at $202.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ALL-PG Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs WRB-PG Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while WRB-PG trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs WRB-PF Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 27.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while WRB-PF trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs WRB-PH Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 27.29B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while WRB-PH trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs WRB Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.20B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while WRB trades at $71.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs MKL Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.29B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while MKL trades at $1,914.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs CINF Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.22B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while CINF trades at $148.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs L Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.57B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while L trades at $88.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs CNA Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 13.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while CNA trades at $48.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs KNSL Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while KNSL trades at $445.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AFG Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.38B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AFG trades at $124.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AFGD Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AFGD trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AFGB Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AFGB trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AFGE Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.26B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AFGE trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AFGC Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AFGC trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AXS-PE Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AXS-PE trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AXS Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.86B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AXS trades at $99.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ALL-PJ Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.98B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs RLI Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while RLI trades at $74.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs THG Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while THG trades at $166.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs SIGI Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while SIGI trades at $85.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ALL-PI Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ALL-PI trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs WTM Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while WTM trades at $1,788.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs PLMR Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while PLMR trades at $155.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs KMPR Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while KMPR trades at $64.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs KMPB Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while KMPB trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs HGTY-WT Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs MCY Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while MCY trades at $62.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ROOT Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ROOT trades at $150.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 82.10. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs LMND Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while LMND trades at $32.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs SKWD Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while SKWD trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs HCI Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while HCI trades at $161.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs STC Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while STC trades at $65.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AHL-PE Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AHL-PE trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -79.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs HMN Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while HMN trades at $41.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs MHLA Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while MHLA trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs BOW Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while BOW trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs SAFT Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while SAFT trades at $81.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs PRA Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while PRA trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AHL-PD Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AHL-PD trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -78.97. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs SIGIP Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while SIGIP trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ARGO Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs HGTY Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 890.46M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while HGTY trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 98.16. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs HRTG Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 804.59M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while HRTG trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs DGICB Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 737.92M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while DGICB trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs UVE Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 724.73M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while UVE trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs UFCS Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 716.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while UFCS trades at $28.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs DGICA Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 700.05M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while DGICA trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ACIC Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 540.11M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ACIC trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs GBLI Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 426.53M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while GBLI trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs UIHC Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.27M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UIHC's ROE of -54.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs AII Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 337.30M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while AII trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas AII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs NODK Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 264.94M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while NODK trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs KINS Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 241.39M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while KINS trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs CNFRZ Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 226.12M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while CNFRZ trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs CNFR Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while CNFR trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs UNAM Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430224.00. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs HALL Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 95834.00. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.
WRB-PE vs ARGO-PA Comparison
WRB-PE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PE stands at 27.47B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 328.00. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PE is priced at $21.67, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.15. In terms of profitability, WRB-PE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PE is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PE.