White Organic Retail Limited
White Organic Retail Limited (WORL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WORL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WORL.BO | ₹7.20 | +3.45% | 235.6M | -1.40 | -₹5.15 | N/A |
| DODLA.BO | ₹1,155.85 | +0.36% | 69.1B | 35.25 | ₹32.50 | +0.17% |
| DODLA.NS | ₹1,160.10 | +0.84% | 69B | 35.23 | ₹32.48 | +0.17% |
| EMPIND.BO | ₹900.00 | -1.85% | 5.4B | 14.63 | ₹61.62 | +2.77% |
| SVJ.BO | ₹501.80 | -9.75% | 2.9B | 996.60 | ₹0.53 | N/A |
| AVEER.BO | ₹523.95 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 56.46 | ₹9.28 | +0.05% |
| NEAGI.BO | ₹3,167.20 | -4.95% | 2B | 7.66 | ₹419.41 | +0.93% |
| FRSHTRP.BO | ₹134.90 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 129.09 | ₹1.05 | N/A |
| BENGALT.BO | ₹157.55 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 14.06 | ₹11.17 | +1.91% |
| PURETROP.BO | ₹176.00 | -0.03% | 1.4B | 63.07 | ₹2.80 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WORL.BO vs DODLA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, DODLA.BO has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while DODLA.BO trades at ₹1,155.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DODLA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to DODLA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to DODLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check DODLA.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs DODLA.NS Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, DODLA.NS has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while DODLA.NS trades at ₹1,160.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DODLA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to DODLA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to DODLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check DODLA.NS's competition here
WORL.BO vs EMPIND.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, EMPIND.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while EMPIND.BO trades at ₹900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EMPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to EMPIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to EMPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check EMPIND.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs SVJ.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, SVJ.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while SVJ.BO trades at ₹501.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SVJ.BO's P/E ratio is 996.60. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to SVJ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to SVJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check SVJ.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs AVEER.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, AVEER.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while AVEER.BO trades at ₹523.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 56.46. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to AVEER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to AVEER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check AVEER.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs NEAGI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, NEAGI.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while NEAGI.BO trades at ₹3,167.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas NEAGI.BO's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to NEAGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to NEAGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check NEAGI.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs FRSHTRP.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, FRSHTRP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while FRSHTRP.BO trades at ₹134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FRSHTRP.BO's P/E ratio is 129.09. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to FRSHTRP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is less volatile compared to FRSHTRP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check FRSHTRP.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs BENGALT.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, BENGALT.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while BENGALT.BO trades at ₹157.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BENGALT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to BENGALT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to BENGALT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check BENGALT.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs PURETROP.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, PURETROP.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while PURETROP.BO trades at ₹176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PURETROP.BO's P/E ratio is 63.07. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to PURETROP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to PURETROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check PURETROP.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs ESSENTIA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, ESSENTIA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while ESSENTIA.BO trades at ₹1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ESSENTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to ESSENTIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to ESSENTIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check ESSENTIA.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs ANIKINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while ANIKINDS.BO trades at ₹48.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ANIKINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.44. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to ANIKINDS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to ANIKINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check ANIKINDS.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs ANIKINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while ANIKINDS.NS trades at ₹46.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ANIKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 81.70. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to ANIKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to ANIKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check ANIKINDS.NS's competition here
WORL.BO vs JAMESWARREN.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, JAMESWARREN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while JAMESWARREN.BO trades at ₹308.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas JAMESWARREN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to JAMESWARREN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check JAMESWARREN.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs TANVI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, TANVI.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while TANVI.BO trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TANVI.BO's P/E ratio is 210.26. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to TANVI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is less volatile compared to TANVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check TANVI.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs MRP.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, MRP.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while MRP.BO trades at ₹90.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MRP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to MRP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to MRP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check MRP.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs HALDER.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, HALDER.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while HALDER.BO trades at ₹245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HALDER.BO's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to HALDER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to HALDER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check HALDER.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs LYKISLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, LYKISLTD.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while LYKISLTD.BO trades at ₹51.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LYKISLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to LYKISLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to LYKISLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check LYKISLTD.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs TIGLOB.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, TIGLOB.BO has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while TIGLOB.BO trades at ₹183.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TIGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to TIGLOB.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to TIGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check TIGLOB.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs MODAIRY.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, MODAIRY.BO has a market cap of 820.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while MODAIRY.BO trades at ₹32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MODAIRY.BO's P/E ratio is 0.96. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to MODAIRY.BO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to MODAIRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check MODAIRY.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs IBINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, IBINFO.BO has a market cap of 746.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while IBINFO.BO trades at ₹612.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas IBINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 46.87. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to IBINFO.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to IBINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check IBINFO.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs FCONSUMER.NS Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, FCONSUMER.NS has a market cap of 718.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while FCONSUMER.NS trades at ₹0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FCONSUMER.NS's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to FCONSUMER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to FCONSUMER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check FCONSUMER.NS's competition here
WORL.BO vs TERAI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, TERAI.BO has a market cap of 696.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while TERAI.BO trades at ₹101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TERAI.BO's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to TERAI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to TERAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check TERAI.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs JFL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, JFL.BO has a market cap of 602.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while JFL.BO trades at ₹39.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas JFL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to JFL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to JFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check JFL.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs UNIQUEO.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, UNIQUEO.BO has a market cap of 534.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while UNIQUEO.BO trades at ₹93.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UNIQUEO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to UNIQUEO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to UNIQUEO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check UNIQUEO.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs ANVRDHI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, ANVRDHI.BO has a market cap of 450M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while ANVRDHI.BO trades at ₹9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ANVRDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 81.83. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to ANVRDHI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to ANVRDHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check ANVRDHI.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs SWOEF.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, SWOEF.BO has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while SWOEF.BO trades at ₹13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SWOEF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to SWOEF.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to SWOEF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check SWOEF.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs CONTILI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, CONTILI.BO has a market cap of 392.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while CONTILI.BO trades at ₹25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CONTILI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to CONTILI.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to CONTILI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check CONTILI.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs SPECFOOD.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, SPECFOOD.BO has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while SPECFOOD.BO trades at ₹13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SPECFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -76.17. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to SPECFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to SPECFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check SPECFOOD.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs APIS.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, APIS.BO has a market cap of 329.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while APIS.BO trades at ₹57.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas APIS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to APIS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to APIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check APIS.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs CHORDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, CHORDIA.BO has a market cap of 280.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while CHORDIA.BO trades at ₹71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CHORDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.08. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to CHORDIA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to CHORDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check CHORDIA.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs KMGMILK.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, KMGMILK.BO has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while KMGMILK.BO trades at ₹46.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KMGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is 112.34. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to KMGMILK.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to KMGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check KMGMILK.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs HEALTHYLIFE.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, HEALTHYLIFE.BO has a market cap of 231.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while HEALTHYLIFE.BO trades at ₹8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HEALTHYLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check HEALTHYLIFE.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs SCAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, SCAGRO.BO has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while SCAGRO.BO trades at ₹36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SCAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 249.80. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to SCAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is less volatile compared to SCAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check SCAGRO.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs VIKASWSP.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, VIKASWSP.BO has a market cap of 222.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while VIKASWSP.BO trades at ₹1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VIKASWSP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to VIKASWSP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to VIKASWSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check VIKASWSP.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs JETMALL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, JETMALL.BO has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while JETMALL.BO trades at ₹32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas JETMALL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to JETMALL.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to JETMALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check JETMALL.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs NMSRESRC.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, NMSRESRC.BO has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while NMSRESRC.BO trades at ₹59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas NMSRESRC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to NMSRESRC.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to NMSRESRC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check NMSRESRC.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs NCCBLUE.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, NCCBLUE.BO has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while NCCBLUE.BO trades at ₹23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas NCCBLUE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to NCCBLUE.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to NCCBLUE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check NCCBLUE.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs ANSINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, ANSINDUS.BO has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while ANSINDUS.BO trades at ₹17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ANSINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to ANSINDUS.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to ANSINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check ANSINDUS.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs TDSL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, TDSL.BO has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while TDSL.BO trades at ₹6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TDSL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to TDSL.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to TDSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check TDSL.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs UNJHAFOR.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, UNJHAFOR.BO has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while UNJHAFOR.BO trades at ₹22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UNJHAFOR.BO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to UNJHAFOR.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to UNJHAFOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check UNJHAFOR.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs NEWTRAC.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, NEWTRAC.BO has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while NEWTRAC.BO trades at ₹5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas NEWTRAC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to NEWTRAC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to NEWTRAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check NEWTRAC.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs OLYOI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, OLYOI.BO has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while OLYOI.BO trades at ₹30.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas OLYOI.BO's P/E ratio is -70.43. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to OLYOI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to OLYOI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check OLYOI.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs UNRYLMA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, UNRYLMA.BO has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while UNRYLMA.BO trades at ₹13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UNRYLMA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to UNRYLMA.BO's ROE of +4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to UNRYLMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check UNRYLMA.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs SHAQUAK.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, SHAQUAK.BO has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while SHAQUAK.BO trades at ₹1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SHAQUAK.BO's P/E ratio is -34.25. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to SHAQUAK.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to SHAQUAK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check SHAQUAK.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs THAKKERS.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, THAKKERS.BO has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while THAKKERS.BO trades at ₹21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas THAKKERS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to THAKKERS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to THAKKERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check THAKKERS.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs TINNATFL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, TINNATFL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while TINNATFL.BO trades at ₹361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TINNATFL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to TINNATFL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to TINNATFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check TINNATFL.BO's competition here
WORL.BO vs MVKAGRO-ST.NS Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, MVKAGRO-ST.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while MVKAGRO-ST.NS trades at ₹576.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MVKAGRO-ST.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check MVKAGRO-ST.NS's competition here
WORL.BO vs HATSUN-RE.NS Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, HATSUN-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while HATSUN-RE.NS trades at ₹480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HATSUN-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to HATSUN-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to HATSUN-RE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check HATSUN-RE.NS's competition here
WORL.BO vs ICLORGANIC.BO Comparison February 2026
WORL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORL.BO stands at 235.6M. In comparison, ICLORGANIC.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORL.BO is priced at ₹7.20, while ICLORGANIC.BO trades at ₹39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ICLORGANIC.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORL.BO's ROE is -14.90%, compared to ICLORGANIC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORL.BO is more volatile compared to ICLORGANIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORL.BO.Check ICLORGANIC.BO's competition here