Wake Up Now, Inc.
Wake Up Now, Inc. (WORC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WORC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WORC | $0.00 | +0.00% | 1.9K | N/A | -$0.02 | N/A |
| AGRIP | $99.80 | +0.05% | 46.8B | 103.63 | $0.96 | N/A |
| ORXCF | $21.33 | +0.65% | 24.2B | 10.25 | $2.08 | +3.84% |
| MIUFF | $7.50 | +14.68% | 10.8B | 11.90 | $0.63 | +1.91% |
| MIUFY | $14.91 | +2.05% | 10.7B | 11.74 | $1.27 | +3.39% |
| EDNMF | $30.45 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 12.90 | $2.36 | +4.16% |
| EDNMY | $14.39 | -0.76% | 7.1B | 12.20 | $1.18 | +4.71% |
| FREJP | $17.76 | +0.00% | 4.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FREJO | $17.50 | +0.00% | 4.4B | -192.31 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| MAURY | $42.67 | +3.54% | 3.8B | 21.77 | $1.96 | +2.24% |
Stock Comparison
WORC vs AGRIP Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AGRIP has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AGRIP trades at $99.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGRIP's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AGRIP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AGRIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGRIP's competition here
WORC vs ORXCF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ORXCF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ORXCF trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORXCF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ORXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and ORXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORXCF's competition here
WORC vs MIUFF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, MIUFF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while MIUFF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIUFF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MIUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and MIUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIUFF's competition here
WORC vs MIUFY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, MIUFY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while MIUFY trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIUFY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MIUFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and MIUFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIUFY's competition here
WORC vs EDNMF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, EDNMF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while EDNMF trades at $30.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDNMF's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EDNMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to EDNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check EDNMF's competition here
WORC vs EDNMY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, EDNMY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while EDNMY trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDNMY's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EDNMY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and EDNMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDNMY's competition here
WORC vs FREJP Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FREJP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FREJP trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FREJP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and FREJP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FREJP's competition here
WORC vs FREJO Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FREJO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FREJO trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREJO's P/E ratio is -192.31. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FREJO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and FREJO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FREJO's competition here
WORC vs MAURY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, MAURY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while MAURY trades at $42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAURY's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MAURY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to MAURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check MAURY's competition here
WORC vs CMPRF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CMPRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CMPRF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPRF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CMPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to CMPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check CMPRF's competition here
WORC vs CSASF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CSASF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CSASF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSASF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CSASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and CSASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSASF's competition here
WORC vs MAURF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, MAURF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while MAURF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAURF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MAURF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to MAURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check MAURF's competition here
WORC vs ZIZTF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ZIZTF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ZIZTF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIZTF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ZIZTF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to ZIZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check ZIZTF's competition here
WORC vs EHMEF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, EHMEF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while EHMEF trades at $128.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHMEF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EHMEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and EHMEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EHMEF's competition here
WORC vs KGTHY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, KGTHY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while KGTHY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGTHY's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KGTHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and KGTHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGTHY's competition here
WORC vs AEOJF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AEOJF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AEOJF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEOJF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AEOJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEOJF's competition here
WORC vs KRKKF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, KRKKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while KRKKF trades at $91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKKF's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KRKKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and KRKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRKKF's competition here
WORC vs AATRL Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AATRL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AATRL trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AATRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AATRL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AATRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AATRL's competition here
WORC vs MITJF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, MITJF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while MITJF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITJF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MITJF's ROE of +12.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and MITJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MITJF's competition here
WORC vs AIFLF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AIFLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AIFLF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIFLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AIFLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AIFLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIFLF's competition here
WORC vs HYPOF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, HYPOF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while HYPOF trades at $214.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPOF's P/E ratio is 84.86. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HYPOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to HYPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check HYPOF's competition here
WORC vs UMTAF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, UMTAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while UMTAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMTAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to UMTAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and UMTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UMTAF's competition here
WORC vs AIFLY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AIFLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AIFLY trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIFLY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AIFLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AIFLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIFLY's competition here
WORC vs PRLPF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, PRLPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while PRLPF trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRLPF's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PRLPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to PRLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check PRLPF's competition here
WORC vs ALEDY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ALEDY has a market cap of 702.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ALEDY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALEDY's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ALEDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to ALEDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check ALEDY's competition here
WORC vs SHGKY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, SHGKY has a market cap of 686.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while SHGKY trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHGKY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SHGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and SHGKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGKY's competition here
WORC vs INJJF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, INJJF has a market cap of 673M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while INJJF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INJJF's P/E ratio is -55.80. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to INJJF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to INJJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check INJJF's competition here
WORC vs ECNCF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ECNCF has a market cap of 627.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ECNCF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECNCF's P/E ratio is 44.60. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ECNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and ECNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECNCF's competition here
WORC vs EGTIF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, EGTIF has a market cap of 539.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while EGTIF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGTIF's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EGTIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and EGTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGTIF's competition here
WORC vs FDCHF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FDCHF has a market cap of 456.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FDCHF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDCHF's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FDCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and FDCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDCHF's competition here
WORC vs ITJTY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ITJTY has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ITJTY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITJTY's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ITJTY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and ITJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITJTY's competition here
WORC vs IPFPF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, IPFPF has a market cap of 327.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while IPFPF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPFPF's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to IPFPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to IPFPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check IPFPF's competition here
WORC vs FAVO Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FAVO has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FAVO trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAVO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FAVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and FAVO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FAVO's competition here
WORC vs NECA Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, NECA has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while NECA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NECA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NECA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to NECA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check NECA's competition here
WORC vs IMMFF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, IMMFF has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while IMMFF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMMFF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to IMMFF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to IMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check IMMFF's competition here
WORC vs GCSSF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, GCSSF has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while GCSSF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCSSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GCSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and GCSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCSSF's competition here
WORC vs ZNKKY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ZNKKY has a market cap of 247M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ZNKKY trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNKKY's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ZNKKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and ZNKKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZNKKY's competition here
WORC vs FPLPF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FPLPF has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FPLPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPLPF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FPLPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to FPLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check FPLPF's competition here
WORC vs SEZNL Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, SEZNL has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while SEZNL trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEZNL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SEZNL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and SEZNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEZNL's competition here
WORC vs CFNB Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CFNB has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CFNB trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNB's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CFNB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to CFNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check CFNB's competition here
WORC vs RYTTF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, RYTTF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while RYTTF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYTTF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RYTTF's ROE of +16.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and RYTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYTTF's competition here
WORC vs YUANF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, YUANF has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while YUANF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUANF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to YUANF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and YUANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUANF's competition here
WORC vs FIGI Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FIGI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FIGI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIGI's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FIGI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and FIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FIGI's competition here
WORC vs ACCFF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ACCFF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ACCFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCFF's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ACCFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to ACCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check ACCFF's competition here
WORC vs CHFHF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CHFHF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CHFHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CHFHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and CHFHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHFHF's competition here
WORC vs IOUFF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, IOUFF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while IOUFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOUFF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to IOUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and IOUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IOUFF's competition here
WORC vs RMIAF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, RMIAF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while RMIAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMIAF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RMIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to RMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check RMIAF's competition here
WORC vs AMSA Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AMSA has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AMSA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMSA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AMSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AMSA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMSA's competition here
WORC vs MRBLF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, MRBLF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while MRBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRBLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MRBLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to MRBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check MRBLF's competition here
WORC vs GWSFF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, GWSFF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while GWSFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWSFF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GWSFF's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and GWSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWSFF's competition here
WORC vs SPFX Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, SPFX has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while SPFX trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFX's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SPFX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and SPFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPFX's competition here
WORC vs PRPS Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, PRPS has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while PRPS trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRPS's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PRPS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and PRPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRPS's competition here
WORC vs FNNZF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FNNZF has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FNNZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNNZF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FNNZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to FNNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check FNNZF's competition here
WORC vs KYNC Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, KYNC has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while KYNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYNC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KYNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to KYNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check KYNC's competition here
WORC vs MBDC Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, MBDC has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while MBDC trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to MBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check MBDC's competition here
WORC vs XSHLF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, XSHLF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while XSHLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSHLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to XSHLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to XSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check XSHLF's competition here
WORC vs AIJTY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AIJTY has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AIJTY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIJTY's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AIJTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AIJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIJTY's competition here
WORC vs CUROQ Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CUROQ has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CUROQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUROQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CUROQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and CUROQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUROQ's competition here
WORC vs CHWWF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CHWWF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CHWWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CHWWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and CHWWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWWF's competition here
WORC vs CAFI Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CAFI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CAFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CAFI's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to CAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check CAFI's competition here
WORC vs ATNPQ Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ATNPQ has a market cap of 925.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ATNPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ATNPQ's ROE of +24.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to ATNPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check ATNPQ's competition here
WORC vs CBRJ Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CBRJ has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CBRJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CBRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to CBRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check CBRJ's competition here
WORC vs CYIO Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CYIO has a market cap of 397.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CYIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CYIO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to CYIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check CYIO's competition here
WORC vs CFGX Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CFGX has a market cap of 315.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CFGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CFGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and CFGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFGX's competition here
WORC vs BCAP Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, BCAP has a market cap of 284.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while BCAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BCAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to BCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check BCAP's competition here
WORC vs COSG Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, COSG has a market cap of 229.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while COSG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to COSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and COSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COSG's competition here
WORC vs HUNTF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, HUNTF has a market cap of 81.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while HUNTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HUNTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to HUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check HUNTF's competition here
WORC vs SUNLQ Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, SUNLQ has a market cap of 79.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while SUNLQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SUNLQ's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to SUNLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check SUNLQ's competition here
WORC vs ECDD Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ECDD has a market cap of 30.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ECDD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ECDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and ECDD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECDD's competition here
WORC vs FDTC Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FDTC has a market cap of 17.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FDTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FDTC's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and FDTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDTC's competition here
WORC vs ARWD Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ARWD has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while ARWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ARWD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to ARWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check ARWD's competition here
WORC vs RAHGF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, RAHGF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while RAHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAHGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RAHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and RAHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAHGF's competition here
WORC vs VIEWF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, VIEWF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while VIEWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to VIEWF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to VIEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check VIEWF's competition here
WORC vs EPOR Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, EPOR has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while EPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EPOR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and EPOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPOR's competition here
WORC vs EPORP Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, EPORP has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while EPORP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPORP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EPORP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and EPORP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPORP's competition here
WORC vs RBRI Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, RBRI has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while RBRI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RBRI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to RBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check RBRI's competition here
WORC vs DKGH Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, DKGH has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while DKGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKGH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to DKGH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and DKGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DKGH's competition here
WORC vs GAFL Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, GAFL has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while GAFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GAFL's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to GAFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check GAFL's competition here
WORC vs WEIDY Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, WEIDY has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while WEIDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEIDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to WEIDY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and WEIDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEIDY's competition here
WORC vs FRNV Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FRNV has a market cap of 596. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FRNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FRNV's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to FRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check FRNV's competition here
WORC vs CHFI Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CHFI has a market cap of 577. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CHFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CHFI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC is less volatile compared to CHFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORC.Check CHFI's competition here
WORC vs TSLMF Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, TSLMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while TSLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLMF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TSLMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and TSLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSLMF's competition here
WORC vs AWKS Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AWKS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while AWKS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWKS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AWKS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and AWKS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWKS's competition here
WORC vs FLXP Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, FLXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while FLXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FLXP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and FLXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLXP's competition here
WORC vs CIAS Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CIAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while CIAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CIAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and CIAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIAS's competition here
WORC vs KTBA Comparison August 2025
WORC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORC stands at 1.9K. In comparison, KTBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WORC is priced at $0.00, while KTBA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORC's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KTBA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORC and KTBA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KTBA's competition here