Woodsvilla Ltd.
Woodsvilla Ltd. (WOODSVILA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WOODSVILA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOODSVILA.BO | ₹13.94 | +4.97% | 83.8M | -27.33 | -₹0.51 | N/A |
| TBOTEK.NS | ₹1,307.95 | -0.11% | 136.9B | 56.83 | ₹22.62 | N/A |
| THOMASCOOK.NS | ₹107.13 | +0.00% | 48.3B | 19.73 | ₹5.26 | +0.43% |
| THOMASCOOK.BO | ₹107.30 | +0.00% | 48.3B | 19.13 | ₹5.42 | +0.43% |
| EASEMYTRIP.BO | ₹8.75 | +0.00% | 31.1B | -31.63 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| EASEMYTRIP.NS | ₹8.76 | +0.00% | 30.9B | -31.52 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| YATRA.NS | ₹116.92 | +0.00% | 17.9B | 33.39 | ₹3.42 | N/A |
| YATRA.BO | ₹116.20 | +0.00% | 17.9B | 33.15 | ₹3.44 | N/A |
| BENARAS.BO | ₹9,501.25 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 28.11 | ₹338.29 | +0.26% |
| UPHOT.BO | ₹1,563.00 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 27.39 | ₹56.58 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WOODSVILA.BO vs TBOTEK.NS Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, TBOTEK.NS has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while TBOTEK.NS trades at ₹1,307.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas TBOTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to TBOTEK.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to TBOTEK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check TBOTEK.NS's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs THOMASCOOK.NS Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.NS has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while THOMASCOOK.NS trades at ₹107.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas THOMASCOOK.NS's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check THOMASCOOK.NS's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs THOMASCOOK.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.BO has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while THOMASCOOK.BO trades at ₹107.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas THOMASCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to THOMASCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check THOMASCOOK.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs EASEMYTRIP.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while EASEMYTRIP.BO trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas EASEMYTRIP.BO's P/E ratio is -31.63. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check EASEMYTRIP.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs EASEMYTRIP.NS Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.NS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while EASEMYTRIP.NS trades at ₹8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas EASEMYTRIP.NS's P/E ratio is -31.52. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check EASEMYTRIP.NS's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs YATRA.NS Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, YATRA.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while YATRA.NS trades at ₹116.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas YATRA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to YATRA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to YATRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check YATRA.NS's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs YATRA.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, YATRA.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while YATRA.BO trades at ₹116.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas YATRA.BO's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to YATRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to YATRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check YATRA.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs BENARAS.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, BENARAS.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while BENARAS.BO trades at ₹9,501.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas BENARAS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to BENARAS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to BENARAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check BENARAS.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs UPHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, UPHOT.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while UPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas UPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to UPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to UPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check UPHOT.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs SAYAJIHOTL.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, SAYAJIHOTL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while SAYAJIHOTL.BO trades at ₹284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SAYAJIHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.76. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO and SAYAJIHOTL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAYAJIHOTL.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs ESPIRE.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, ESPIRE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while ESPIRE.BO trades at ₹303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas ESPIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 145.62. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to ESPIRE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to ESPIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check ESPIRE.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs SINCLAIR.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, SINCLAIR.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while SINCLAIR.BO trades at ₹75.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SINCLAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to SINCLAIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to SINCLAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check SINCLAIR.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs EMERALL.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, EMERALL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while EMERALL.BO trades at ₹190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas EMERALL.BO's P/E ratio is -28.07. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to EMERALL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to EMERALL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check EMERALL.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs GRAVISSHO.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, GRAVISSHO.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while GRAVISSHO.BO trades at ₹29.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas GRAVISSHO.BO's P/E ratio is -92.30. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to GRAVISSHO.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to GRAVISSHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check GRAVISSHO.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs PHOENIXTN.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, PHOENIXTN.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while PHOENIXTN.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas PHOENIXTN.BO's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to PHOENIXTN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to PHOENIXTN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check PHOENIXTN.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs SAVERA.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, SAVERA.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while SAVERA.BO trades at ₹150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SAVERA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to SAVERA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to SAVERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check SAVERA.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs HBESD.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, HBESD.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while HBESD.BO trades at ₹79.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas HBESD.BO's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to HBESD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to HBESD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check HBESD.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs CHLLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, CHLLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while CHLLTD.BO trades at ₹31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas CHLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to CHLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO and CHLLTD.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHLLTD.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs GUJHOTE.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, GUJHOTE.BO has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while GUJHOTE.BO trades at ₹190.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas GUJHOTE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to GUJHOTE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to GUJHOTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check GUJHOTE.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs RAYALEMA.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, RAYALEMA.BO has a market cap of 631.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while RAYALEMA.BO trades at ₹31.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RAYALEMA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to RAYALEMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to RAYALEMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check RAYALEMA.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs JINDHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, JINDHOT.BO has a market cap of 455.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while JINDHOT.BO trades at ₹65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas JINDHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to JINDHOT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to JINDHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check JINDHOT.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs PECOS.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, PECOS.BO has a market cap of 423.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while PECOS.BO trades at ₹323.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas PECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to PECOS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO and PECOS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PECOS.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs COX&KINGS.NS Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, COX&KINGS.NS has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while COX&KINGS.NS trades at ₹1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas COX&KINGS.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to COX&KINGS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO and COX&KINGS.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COX&KINGS.NS's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs PGCRL.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, PGCRL.BO has a market cap of 298.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while PGCRL.BO trades at ₹108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas PGCRL.BO's P/E ratio is -123.83. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to PGCRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to PGCRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check PGCRL.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs ARUNAHTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, ARUNAHTEL.BO has a market cap of 263.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while ARUNAHTEL.BO trades at ₹8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas ARUNAHTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check ARUNAHTEL.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs RELIABVEN.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, RELIABVEN.BO has a market cap of 229.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while RELIABVEN.BO trades at ₹20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RELIABVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -693.33. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to RELIABVEN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to RELIABVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check RELIABVEN.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs HOWARHO.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, HOWARHO.BO has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while HOWARHO.BO trades at ₹23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas HOWARHO.BO's P/E ratio is 49.47. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to HOWARHO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to HOWARHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check HOWARHO.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs POLOHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, POLOHOT.BO has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while POLOHOT.BO trades at ₹9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas POLOHOT.BO's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to POLOHOT.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to POLOHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check POLOHOT.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs BESTEAST.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, BESTEAST.BO has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while BESTEAST.BO trades at ₹11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas BESTEAST.BO's P/E ratio is -85.36. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to BESTEAST.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to BESTEAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check BESTEAST.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs HOTLSILV.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, HOTLSILV.BO has a market cap of 188.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while HOTLSILV.BO trades at ₹11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas HOTLSILV.BO's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to HOTLSILV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to HOTLSILV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check HOTLSILV.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs CINDHO.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, CINDHO.BO has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while CINDHO.BO trades at ₹52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas CINDHO.BO's P/E ratio is 75.36. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to CINDHO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to CINDHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check CINDHO.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs VELHO.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, VELHO.BO has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while VELHO.BO trades at ₹5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas VELHO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to VELHO.BO's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to VELHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check VELHO.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs RASRESOR.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, RASRESOR.BO has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while RASRESOR.BO trades at ₹41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RASRESOR.BO's P/E ratio is 49.55. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to RASRESOR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to RASRESOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check RASRESOR.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs LORDSHOTL.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, LORDSHOTL.BO has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while LORDSHOTL.BO trades at ₹13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas LORDSHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.42. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to LORDSHOTL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to LORDSHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check LORDSHOTL.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs SAILANI.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, SAILANI.BO has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while SAILANI.BO trades at ₹19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SAILANI.BO's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to SAILANI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO and SAILANI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAILANI.BO's competition here
WOODSVILA.BO vs SILVERPRL.BO Comparison February 2026
WOODSVILA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOODSVILA.BO stands at 83.8M. In comparison, SILVERPRL.BO has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOODSVILA.BO is priced at ₹13.94, while SILVERPRL.BO trades at ₹7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOODSVILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SILVERPRL.BO's P/E ratio is -181.75. In terms of profitability, WOODSVILA.BO's ROE is N/A, compared to SILVERPRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOODSVILA.BO is less volatile compared to SILVERPRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOODSVILA.BO.Check SILVERPRL.BO's competition here