World Am, Inc.
World Am, Inc. (WOAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WOAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOAM | $0.00 | -0.00% | 32.8K | -0.01 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ASAZY | $17.04 | +0.88% | 38.1B | 25.01 | $0.68 | +1.66% |
| ASAZF | $33.72 | -2.03% | 35.5B | 24.61 | $1.37 | +1.64% |
| SOMLF | $36.00 | +0.00% | 15B | 20.45 | $1.76 | +1.84% |
| SCTBY | $14.88 | +3.55% | 8.9B | 15.03 | $0.99 | +2.69% |
| SCTBF | $15.35 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 15.66 | $0.98 | +2.63% |
| SOMLY | $9.10 | -1.09% | 7.6B | 20.65 | $0.44 | +1.00% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 16.00 | $2.47 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $5.85 | -0.85% | 459.4M | 83.57 | $0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WOAM vs ASAZY Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while ASAZY trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check ASAZY's competition here
WOAM vs ASAZF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while ASAZF trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check ASAZF's competition here
WOAM vs SOMLF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SOMLF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and SOMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMLF's competition here
WOAM vs SCTBY Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SCTBY trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and SCTBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTBY's competition here
WOAM vs SCTBF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and SCTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTBF's competition here
WOAM vs SOMLY Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SOMLY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check SOMLY's competition here
WOAM vs LOIMF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and LOIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOIMF's competition here
WOAM vs SOHGF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check SOHGF's competition here
WOAM vs MRLWF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 459.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while MRLWF trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is 83.57. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and MRLWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRLWF's competition here
WOAM vs CRFQF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check CRFQF's competition here
WOAM vs ICTSF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while ICTSF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check ICTSF's competition here
WOAM vs GKPRF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while GKPRF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -97.00. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check GKPRF's competition here
WOAM vs RSKIA Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while RSKIA trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and RSKIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSKIA's competition here
WOAM vs WPNNF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check WPNNF's competition here
WOAM vs SECUF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SECUF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -181.04. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SECUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and SECUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SECUF's competition here
WOAM vs PRBCF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check PRBCF's competition here
WOAM vs CSTI Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check CSTI's competition here
WOAM vs LDDFF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while LDDFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check LDDFF's competition here
WOAM vs VOTDF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check VOTDF's competition here
WOAM vs DADTF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and DADTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DADTF's competition here
WOAM vs PLRTF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check PLRTF's competition here
WOAM vs DTII Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while DTII trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check DTII's competition here
WOAM vs IWAL Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while IWAL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check IWAL's competition here
WOAM vs DIGTF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while DIGTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check DIGTF's competition here
WOAM vs PTEFF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while PTEFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check PTEFF's competition here
WOAM vs SSECF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and SSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSECF's competition here
WOAM vs MACE Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check MACE's competition here
WOAM vs ARGL Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and ARGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARGL's competition here
WOAM vs DRNG Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 783.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check DRNG's competition here
WOAM vs WCCP Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 719.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while WCCP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check WCCP's competition here
WOAM vs VCON Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check VCON's competition here
WOAM vs ATWT Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 480.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and ATWT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATWT's competition here
WOAM vs LGTT Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and LGTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGTT's competition here
WOAM vs BLPG Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 371.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while BLPG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and BLPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLPG's competition here
WOAM vs VSYS Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and VSYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSYS's competition here
WOAM vs PSGI Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and PSGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSGI's competition here
WOAM vs SCTY Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and SCTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTY's competition here
WOAM vs GDSI Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and GDSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDSI's competition here
WOAM vs HCGS Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check HCGS's competition here
WOAM vs MIHL Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and MIHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIHL's competition here
WOAM vs MGNT Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and MGNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGNT's competition here
WOAM vs ABPR Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and ABPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABPR's competition here
WOAM vs PERL Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and PERL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PERL's competition here
WOAM vs ALXXF Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while ALXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check ALXXF's competition here
WOAM vs EKCS Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOAM.Check EKCS's competition here
WOAM vs EBWK Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and EBWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBWK's competition here
WOAM vs SKVY Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and SKVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKVY's competition here
WOAM vs HWSY Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and HWSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWSY's competition here
WOAM vs CVAS Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and CVAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVAS's competition here
WOAM vs DIRV Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and DIRV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIRV's competition here
WOAM vs GTKP Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and GTKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTKP's competition here
WOAM vs HLCN Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and HLCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLCN's competition here
WOAM vs PWLK Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and PWLK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PWLK's competition here
WOAM vs VSYM Comparison July 2025
WOAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOAM stands at 32.8K. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WOAM is priced at $0.00, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOAM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOAM's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOAM and VSYM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSYM's competition here