Wentworth Energy, Inc.

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check NSTKF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while WOPEF trades at $14.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check WOPEF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PEXNY trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PEXNY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while DETNF trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check DETNF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while IPXHY trades at $14.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check IPXHY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while TRMLF trades at $42.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check TRMLF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while SSLZY trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check SSLZY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while STOSF trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check STOSF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while IPXHF trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check IPXHF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while RGRLF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check RGRLF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while AETUF trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check AETUF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check NOVKY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check SPGYF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PTRRY trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PTRRY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while DKDRF trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check DKDRF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while MEGEF trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check MEGEF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check VSOGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PREKF trades at $17.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PREKF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while DLKGF trades at $213.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check DLKGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PMOIF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PMOIF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while DELKY trades at $20.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check DELKY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while HBRIY trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check HBRIY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while OASPW trades at $55.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check OASPW's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PEYUF trades at $14.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PEYUF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check EFVIF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while EERGF trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check EERGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check BTEGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PRMRF trades at $15.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PRMRF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while BEPTF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check BEPTF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while NUVSF trades at $10.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check NUVSF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while ATHOF trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check ATHOF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PTGIF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check BCHEY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while IPCFF trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check IPCFF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check MEYYY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check JPTXF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while FRHLF trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check FRHLF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while DTNOF trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -28.40. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check DTNOF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while AAVVF trades at $8.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -61.69. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check AAVVF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while BIREF trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check BIREF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while CDDRF trades at $5.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check CDDRF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check CRCQW's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check WLLAW's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PARXF trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PARXF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while KELTF trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check KELTF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 923.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while SQZZF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check SQZZF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 917M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while KRNGF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check KRNGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while BWEFF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check BWEFF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check UNEGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check CWEGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 864.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while AOIFF trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check AOIFF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 836.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while CRLFF trades at $5.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check CRLFF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 683.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while DALXF trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check DALXF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 677.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while KWTEF trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check KWTEF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 663.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while RCKHF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check RCKHF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check AAGEF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 527.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while ZPTAF trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check ZPTAF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check GFKSY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while GUKYF trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 75.29. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check GUKYF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 483.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PTALF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PTALF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 451.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while KRNGY trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check KRNGY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 446.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while SHASF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check SHASF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 445.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while COPJF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check COPJF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check TBNRF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check BKBEF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PTHRF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -30.68. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PTHRF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while ATUUF trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -40.31. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check ATUUF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while OILSF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check OILSF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PRYGF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PEGIY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while ENQUF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check ENQUF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while FECCF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check FECCF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while CEIEF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check CEIEF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 307.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while TUWLF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check TUWLF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PESAF trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PESAF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while TUWOY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check TUWOY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 260.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while EXCE trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check EXCE's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while ZNOG trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check ZNOG's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while GEGYF trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check GEGYF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while IPOOF trades at $7.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check IPOOF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check HZNFF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check ITEEF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check CRNZF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PIFYF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -13.01. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PIFYF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PSHIF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while EEGUF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check EEGUF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check HRCXF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 177.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while GASXF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check GASXF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while SEUSF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check SEUSF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while RECWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check RECWF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check GEGYY's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while ALVOF trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check ALVOF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PNWRF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check KGEIF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 153.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check SVNNF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while LNDNF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check LNDNF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 143.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while RUBLF trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check RUBLF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while PTRUF trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 108.54. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check PTRUF's competition here

WNWG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNWG stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, WNWG is priced at $0.00, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNWG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, WNWG's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WNWG is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNWG.Check SLGYF's competition here