Wellstar International, Inc.
Wellstar International, Inc. WLSI Peers
See (WLSI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLSI | $0.00 | N/A | 73.7K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMMNY | $26.53 | +0.25% | 119B | 25.03 | $1.06 | +0.98% |
| SEMHF | $52.88 | +1.11% | 59.3B | 25.06 | $2.11 | +2.14% |
| RYLPF | $22.41 | N/A | 20.7B | 74.71 | $0.30 | +4.24% |
| SONVY | $62.33 | +0.71% | 18.6B | 28.33 | $2.20 | +1.53% |
| SONVF | $298.00 | N/A | 17.8B | 27.09 | $11.00 | +1.96% |
| SNNUF | $15.38 | +2.53% | 13.5B | 32.72 | $0.47 | +2.44% |
| CHEOF | $182.46 | N/A | 11.9B | 50.26 | $3.63 | +1.52% |
| CHEOY | $87.07 | -1.14% | 11.4B | 47.84 | $1.82 | +1.61% |
| WILYY | $20.71 | +4.79% | 8.8B | 20.50 | $1.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLSI vs SMMNY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, SMMNY has a market cap of 119B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while SMMNY trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMNY's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMMNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to SMMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs SEMHF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, SEMHF has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while SEMHF trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMHF's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to SEMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs RYLPF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, RYLPF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while RYLPF trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYLPF's P/E ratio is 74.71. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RYLPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to RYLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs SONVY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, SONVY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while SONVY trades at $62.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONVY's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SONVY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to SONVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs SONVF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, SONVF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while SONVF trades at $298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONVF's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SONVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to SONVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs SNNUF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, SNNUF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while SNNUF trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNNUF's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to SNNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CHEOF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CHEOF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CHEOF trades at $182.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEOF's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHEOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CHEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CHEOY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CHEOY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CHEOY trades at $87.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEOY's P/E ratio is 47.84. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHEOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CHEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs WILYY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, WILYY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while WILYY trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILYY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WILYY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to WILYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs WILLF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, WILLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while WILLF trades at $38.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILLF's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WILLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to WILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs GNGBF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, GNGBF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while GNGBF trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNGBF's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to GNGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs GNGBY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, GNGBY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while GNGBY trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNGBY's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNGBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to GNGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs AMBFF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, AMBFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while AMBFF trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBFF's P/E ratio is 72.21. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMBFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to AMBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs AMBBY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, AMBBY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while AMBBY trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBBY's P/E ratio is 71.96. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMBBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to AMBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs NHNKY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, NHNKY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while NHNKY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHNKY's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NHNKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to NHNKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs NHNKF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, NHNKF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while NHNKF trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHNKF's P/E ratio is 41.86. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NHNKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to NHNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs VTRLY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, VTRLY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while VTRLY trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTRLY's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VTRLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to VTRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs GNNDY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, GNNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while GNNDY trades at $43.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNNDY's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to GNNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs GGNDF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, GGNDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while GGNDF trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGNDF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GGNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to GGNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs STSEY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, STSEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while STSEY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSEY's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STSEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to STSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs OSSFF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, OSSFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while OSSFF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSSFF's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSSFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to OSSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs DWRKF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, DWRKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while DWRKF trades at $543.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWRKF's P/E ratio is 75.94. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DWRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to DWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs MCRPF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, MCRPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while MCRPF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRPF's P/E ratio is -7.82. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCRPF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to MCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs OSSUY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, OSSUY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while OSSUY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSSUY's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSSUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to OSSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs MEDGF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, MEDGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while MEDGF trades at $83.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEDGF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEDGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to MEDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs DRWKF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, DRWKF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while DRWKF trades at $67.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRWKF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRWKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to DRWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs DGWPF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, DGWPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while DGWPF trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGWPF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DGWPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to DGWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs XVIPF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, XVIPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while XVIPF trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XVIPF's P/E ratio is 73.11. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XVIPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to XVIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs LFTSF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, LFTSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while LFTSF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFTSF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LFTSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to LFTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs ELEAF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, ELEAF has a market cap of 832.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while ELEAF trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEAF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELEAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to ELEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs MDRSF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, MDRSF has a market cap of 828.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while MDRSF trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDRSF's P/E ratio is 196.12. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDRSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to MDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CALZF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CALZF has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CALZF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALZF's P/E ratio is 81.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CALZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CALZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs AVMR Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, AVMR has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while AVMR trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVMR's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVMR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to AVMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CLVSF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CLVSF has a market cap of 459.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CLVSF trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLVSF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLVSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CLVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs IOBCF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, IOBCF has a market cap of 404.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while IOBCF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOBCF's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOBCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to IOBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs HYBT Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, HYBT has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while HYBT trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYBT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to HYBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs EAPIF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, EAPIF has a market cap of 290.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while EAPIF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAPIF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EAPIF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to EAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CLLKF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CLLKF has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CLLKF trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLKF's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLLKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CLLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CSSPF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CSSPF has a market cap of 263.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CSSPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSPF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSSPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CSSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CYBQY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CYBQY has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CYBQY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBQY's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBQY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CYBQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs HTLZF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, HTLZF has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while HTLZF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTLZF's P/E ratio is -159.01. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HTLZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to HTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs BCCOY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, BCCOY has a market cap of 221M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while BCCOY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCOY's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCCOY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to BCCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs IMPZY Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, IMPZY has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while IMPZY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPZY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMPZY's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to IMPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CYBQF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CYBQF has a market cap of 162.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CYBQF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBQF's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CYBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs BRNHF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, BRNHF has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while BRNHF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRNHF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to BRNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs EKDHF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, EKDHF has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while EKDHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKDHF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EKDHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to EKDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs PXMBF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, PXMBF has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while PXMBF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXMBF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PXMBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to PXMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs JMDMF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, JMDMF has a market cap of 157.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while JMDMF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMDMF's P/E ratio is -43.25. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMDMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to JMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs AVHHL Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, AVHHL has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while AVHHL trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVHHL's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVHHL's ROE of -3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to AVHHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs BRSYF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, BRSYF has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while BRSYF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSYF's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRSYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to BRSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs AMEUF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, AMEUF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while AMEUF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMEUF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMEUF's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to AMEUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs VMTHF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, VMTHF has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while VMTHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMTHF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VMTHF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to VMTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs FDMDF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, FDMDF has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while FDMDF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDMDF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FDMDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to FDMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs SOMNF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, SOMNF has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while SOMNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMNF's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOMNF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to SOMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs RSHUF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, RSHUF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while RSHUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSHUF's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSHUF's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is less volatile compared to RSHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CKMTF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CKMTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CKMTF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKMTF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKMTF's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CKMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs DMTRF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, DMTRF has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while DMTRF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to DMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs SNZZF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, SNZZF has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while SNZZF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNZZF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNZZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to SNZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs IPDQF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, IPDQF has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while IPDQF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPDQF's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPDQF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to IPDQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs RDGL Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, RDGL has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while RDGL trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDGL's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDGL's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to RDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs BLOZF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, BLOZF has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while BLOZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLOZF's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLOZF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to BLOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs NVYTF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, NVYTF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while NVYTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVYTF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVYTF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to NVYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs TLTFF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, TLTFF has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while TLTFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTFF's P/E ratio is -13.96. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLTFF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to TLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs ELXMF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, ELXMF has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while ELXMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELXMF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELXMF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to ELXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs KBBTF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, KBBTF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while KBBTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBBTF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBBTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to KBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs MKEAF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, MKEAF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while MKEAF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKEAF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MKEAF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to MKEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs POSC Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, POSC has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while POSC trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POSC's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POSC's ROE of +9.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to POSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs EMITF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, EMITF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while EMITF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMITF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMITF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to EMITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs ASAPF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, ASAPF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while ASAPF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAPF's P/E ratio is -22.51. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASAPF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to ASAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs DIZTF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, DIZTF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while DIZTF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIZTF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIZTF's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to DIZTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs MDXHF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, MDXHF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while MDXHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDXHF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDXHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to MDXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs PYNKF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, PYNKF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while PYNKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYNKF's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PYNKF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to PYNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs TMDIF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, TMDIF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while TMDIF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMDIF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMDIF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is less volatile compared to TMDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs PLLWF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, PLLWF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while PLLWF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLWF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLLWF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to PLLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs GTHP Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, GTHP has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while GTHP trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTHP's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTHP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to GTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs RMSL Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, RMSL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while RMSL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMSL's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMSL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to RMSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs VPTDF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, VPTDF has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while VPTDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPTDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VPTDF's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to VPTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs ALRTF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, ALRTF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while ALRTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRTF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALRTF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to ALRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs IMEXF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, IMEXF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while IMEXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMEXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMEXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is less volatile compared to IMEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs ATBPF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, ATBPF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while ATBPF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATBPF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATBPF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to ATBPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs LXXGF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, LXXGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while LXXGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXXGF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LXXGF's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to LXXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs IRME Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, IRME has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while IRME trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRME's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRME's ROE of +11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to IRME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs DTXMF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, DTXMF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while DTXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTXMF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTXMF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to DTXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs QLIS Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, QLIS has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while QLIS trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLIS's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QLIS's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to QLIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs RHNMF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, RHNMF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while RHNMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHNMF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHNMF's ROE of +15.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to RHNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs FZMD Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, FZMD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while FZMD trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FZMD's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FZMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to FZMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs NUMD Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, NUMD has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while NUMD trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUMD's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NUMD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to NUMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs TBRIF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, TBRIF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while TBRIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBRIF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBRIF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to TBRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs MICR Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, MICR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while MICR trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICR's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MICR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to MICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs LBLTF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, LBLTF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while LBLTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBLTF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LBLTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is less volatile compared to LBLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs VYCO Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, VYCO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while VYCO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYCO's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VYCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to VYCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs ADMT Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, ADMT has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while ADMT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMT's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADMT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to ADMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs BIEL Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, BIEL has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while BIEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIEL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to BIEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs LLBO Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, LLBO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while LLBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to LLBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs VANIW Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, VANIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while VANIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VANIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VANIW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to VANIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs ESMC Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, ESMC has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while ESMC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMC's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESMC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to ESMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs CYDX Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, CYDX has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while CYDX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYDX's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYDX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to CYDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs USAQ Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, USAQ has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while USAQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAQ's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USAQ's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to USAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.
WLSI vs PMEDF Comparison
WLSI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLSI stands at 73.7K. In comparison, PMEDF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLSI is priced at $0.00, while PMEDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLSI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEDF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, WLSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMEDF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WLSI is more volatile compared to PMEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLSI.