Worldline SA
Worldline SA WLN.PA Peers
See (WLN.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLN.PA | €3.51 | +0.29% | 995.4M | -3.35 | -€1.05 | N/A |
| ADYEN.AS | €1,549.60 | -0.79% | 48.8B | 52.44 | €29.55 | N/A |
| EXN.PA | €18.96 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 43.09 | €0.44 | +27.90% |
| OVH.PA | €11.00 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 137.50 | €0.08 | N/A |
| ITE.PA | €9.52 | +5.78% | 766.7M | 52.89 | €0.18 | +2.10% |
| ALLIX.PA | €24.60 | -5.02% | 161.7M | -36.72 | -€0.67 | N/A |
| ALHYP.PA | €10.85 | -3.12% | 68.5M | 9.27 | €1.17 | N/A |
| MLMFI.PA | €12.00 | N/A | 27.8M | -55.30 | -€0.22 | N/A |
| VMX.PA | €0.29 | +5.56% | 24.8M | -2.85 | -€0.10 | N/A |
| KEYW.BR | €0.83 | -2.35% | 17.8M | 16.60 | €0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLN.PA vs ADYEN.AS Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, ADYEN.AS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while ADYEN.AS trades at €1,549.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas ADYEN.AS's P/E ratio is 52.44. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADYEN.AS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to ADYEN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs EXN.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, EXN.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while EXN.PA trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas EXN.PA's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to EXN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs OVH.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, OVH.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while OVH.PA trades at €11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas OVH.PA's P/E ratio is 137.50. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OVH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to OVH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs ITE.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, ITE.PA has a market cap of 766.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while ITE.PA trades at €9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas ITE.PA's P/E ratio is 52.89. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ITE.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is less volatile compared to ITE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs ALLIX.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, ALLIX.PA has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while ALLIX.PA trades at €24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas ALLIX.PA's P/E ratio is -36.72. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALLIX.PA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is less volatile compared to ALLIX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs ALHYP.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, ALHYP.PA has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while ALHYP.PA trades at €10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas ALHYP.PA's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALHYP.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to ALHYP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs MLMFI.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, MLMFI.PA has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while MLMFI.PA trades at €12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas MLMFI.PA's P/E ratio is -55.30. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLMFI.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to MLMFI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs VMX.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, VMX.PA has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while VMX.PA trades at €0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas VMX.PA's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VMX.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is less volatile compared to VMX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs KEYW.BR Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, KEYW.BR has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while KEYW.BR trades at €0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas KEYW.BR's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KEYW.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to KEYW.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs EAS2P.AS Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, EAS2P.AS has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while EAS2P.AS trades at €0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas EAS2P.AS's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EAS2P.AS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to EAS2P.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs ALMUN.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, ALMUN.PA has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while ALMUN.PA trades at €0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas ALMUN.PA's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALMUN.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is less volatile compared to ALMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs ALKLK.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, ALKLK.PA has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while ALKLK.PA trades at €0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas ALKLK.PA's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALKLK.PA's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is less volatile compared to ALKLK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs ALGEC.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, ALGEC.PA has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while ALGEC.PA trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas ALGEC.PA's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALGEC.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is less volatile compared to ALGEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs MLIFC.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, MLIFC.PA has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while MLIFC.PA trades at €2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas MLIFC.PA's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLIFC.PA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to MLIFC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs MSF.BR Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, MSF.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while MSF.BR trades at €319.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas MSF.BR's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSF.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to MSF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs MLCEC.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, MLCEC.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while MLCEC.PA trades at €0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas MLCEC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLCEC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to MLCEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs GLOG.BR Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, GLOG.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while GLOG.BR trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas GLOG.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLOG.BR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to GLOG.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.
WLN.PA vs MLFSG.PA Comparison
WLN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLN.PA stands at 995.4M. In comparison, MLFSG.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLN.PA is priced at €3.51, while MLFSG.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.35, whereas MLFSG.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLN.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLFSG.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLN.PA is more volatile compared to MLFSG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLN.PA.