Wilmar International Limited
Wilmar International Limited WLMIY Peers
See (WLMIY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLMIY | $23.91 | +1.31% | 14.9B | 12.79 | $1.87 | +5.14% |
| WLMIF | $2.08 | -12.97% | 13B | 10.95 | $0.19 | +5.91% |
| MHGVY | $18.61 | -1.00% | 9.6B | 25.49 | $0.73 | +3.39% |
| MNHVF | $18.44 | +3.77% | 9.5B | 25.26 | $0.73 | +3.46% |
| HLKKF | $0.02 | +14900.00% | 7.3B | -0.21 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| SALRF | $54.04 | +17.48% | 7.2B | 40.63 | $1.33 | +6.04% |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | N/A | 6.9B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +1.11% |
| PPOKF | $0.39 | +15.59% | 6.4B | 39.30 | $0.01 | +0.47% |
| KLKBY | $5.32 | +24.15% | 6.3B | 35.47 | $0.15 | +0.59% |
| CHPFF | $0.78 | N/A | 6.1B | 7.84 | $0.10 | +3.82% |
Stock Comparison
WLMIY vs WLMIF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while WLMIF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to WLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs MHGVY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while MHGVY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs MNHVF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while MNHVF trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to MNHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs HLKKF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while HLKKF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to HLKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SALRF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SALRF trades at $54.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs KLKBF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to KLKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs PPOKF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to PPOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs KLKBY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while KLKBY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to KLKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CHPFF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to CHPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SALRY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SALRY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CPOUF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CPOUF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to CPOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs AAYYY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is -931.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs ACOPY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while ACOPY trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to ACOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs BKFKF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while BKFKF trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 72.83. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to BKFKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs GARPF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while GARPF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to GARPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs IDBHF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs KNKZF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to KNKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs ASTVF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to ASTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SLCJY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SLCJY trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs PTABF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while PTABF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs DNDPF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to DNDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs UPBMF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while UPBMF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CTTQF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to CTTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs GRCLF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 878.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while GRCLF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to GRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs MRVSY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 862.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while MRVSY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -16.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to MRVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs EDESY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while EDESY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to EDESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs PPLFF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs ASAGF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 602.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while ASAGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SISAF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 562.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to SISAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs MHPSY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 469.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while MHPSY trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to MHPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs GRGSF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 460.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while GRGSF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to GRGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs AAGRY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 458.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while AAGRY trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to AAGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs ALFDF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 449.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while ALFDF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs ORENF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 444.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while ORENF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to ORENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs BRCPF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to BRCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SLMCF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to SLMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SLCJF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs PPLFY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while PPLFY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs AEPLF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while AEPLF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to AEPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs UVPOF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while UVPOF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs PRCF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SARDY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SARDY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to SARDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SARDF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SARDF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs STNT Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while STNT trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to STNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs DDEJF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while DDEJF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs DNDEF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CTUNF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CTUNF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs NNUTU Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to NNUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs AASZF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while AASZF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to AASZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs GARPY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while GARPY trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CLAD Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs OPTHF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while OPTHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs GLGLF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while GLGLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to GLGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CMGHY Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SPZI Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SPZI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs PEASF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEASF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to PEASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs IGPFF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while IGPFF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs HERB Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while HERB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs GSFD Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while GSFD trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to GSFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs GCEH Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CMGHF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CMGHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to CMGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs RSSFF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to RSSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs MINE Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs STEV Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs PNDHF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 915.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to PNDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs FLAF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 460.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLAF's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to FLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs MSRM Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 356.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while MSRM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CFPI Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 285.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CFPI trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs MSAH Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 241.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while MSAH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to MSAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs HERF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 201.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while HERF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to HERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SHMP Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 123.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CHYI Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CHYI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to CHYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs OGAA Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to OGAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs URBF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to URBF's ROE of -56.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SUWN Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SUWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to SUWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs SIAF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to SIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs URYL Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to URYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs BIQIF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs TAER Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while TAER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to TAER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs KALRQ Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to KALRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs FFRMF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 171. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs TSLLF Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TSLLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while TSLLF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas TSLLF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSLLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to TSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs CAOX Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CAOX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while CAOX trades at $601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CAOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to CAOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs OCESP Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.
WLMIY vs BYIN Comparison
WLMIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMIY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BYIN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMIY is priced at $23.91, while BYIN trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMIY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas BYIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMIY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYIN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMIY is more volatile compared to BYIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMIY.