Willow Biosciences Inc.
Willow Biosciences Inc. WLLW.TO Peers
See (WLLW.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLLW.TO | $0.03 | -14.29% | 4.35M | -0.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| CURA.CN | $5.22 | +9.21% | 4.07B | -6.07 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| BHC.TO | $6.53 | +1.40% | 2.41B | -38.41 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| VRNO.CN | $6.32 | +6.76% | 2.17B | -5.40 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| GTII.CN | $7.90 | +1.80% | 1.80B | 27.24 | $0.29 | N/A |
| TRUL.CN | $6.21 | -4.02% | 1.22B | -5.65 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| CRON.TO | $2.98 | +2.05% | 1.15B | 14.90 | $0.20 | N/A |
| CURA.TO | $1.15 | -7.26% | 854.14M | -2.50 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| TER.CN | $2.38 | -0.42% | 804.79M | -1.33 | -$1.79 | N/A |
| DHT-UN.TO | $12.61 | +0.88% | 710.08M | -157.62 | -$0.08 | +7.62% |
Stock Comparison
WLLW.TO vs CURA.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CURA.CN has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CURA.CN trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CURA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CURA.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CURA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs BHC.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, BHC.TO has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while BHC.TO trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BHC.TO's P/E ratio is -38.41. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to BHC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to BHC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs VRNO.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, VRNO.CN has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while VRNO.CN trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VRNO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to VRNO.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to VRNO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs GTII.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, GTII.CN has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while GTII.CN trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GTII.CN's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to GTII.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to GTII.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TRUL.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TRUL.CN has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TRUL.CN trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TRUL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TRUL.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to TRUL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CRON.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CRON.TO has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CRON.TO trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CRON.TO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CRON.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CRON.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CURA.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CURA.TO has a market cap of 854.14M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CURA.TO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CURA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CURA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CURA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TER.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TER.CN has a market cap of 804.79M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TER.CN trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TER.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TER.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to TER.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs DHT-UN.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, DHT-UN.TO has a market cap of 710.08M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while DHT-UN.TO trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas DHT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -157.62. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to DHT-UN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to DHT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TLRY.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TLRY.TO has a market cap of 697.36M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TLRY.TO trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TLRY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TLRY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to TLRY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs GUD.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, GUD.TO has a market cap of 576.80M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while GUD.TO trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GUD.TO's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to GUD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to GUD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs WEED.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, WEED.TO has a market cap of 495.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while WEED.TO trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas WEED.TO's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to WEED.TO's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to WEED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs DHT-U.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, DHT-U.TO has a market cap of 464.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while DHT-U.TO trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas DHT-U.TO's P/E ratio is -137.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to DHT-U.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to DHT-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs ACB.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, ACB.TO has a market cap of 392.97M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while ACB.TO trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ACB.TO's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to ACB.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to ACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs VRNO.NE Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, VRNO.NE has a market cap of 334.54M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while VRNO.NE trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VRNO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to VRNO.NE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to VRNO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CL.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CL.CN has a market cap of 323.73M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CL.CN trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CL.CN's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CL.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CPH.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CPH.TO has a market cap of 319.66M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CPH.TO trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CPH.TO's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CPH.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CPH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs OGI.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, OGI.TO has a market cap of 236.10M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while OGI.TO trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas OGI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to OGI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to OGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CCHW.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CCHW.CN has a market cap of 228.66M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CCHW.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CCHW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CCHW.CN's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CCHW.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TH.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TH.TO has a market cap of 167.37M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TH.TO trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TH.TO's P/E ratio is -36.40. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TH.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to TH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs HLS.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, HLS.TO has a market cap of 152.61M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while HLS.TO trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas HLS.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to HLS.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to HLS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TSND.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TSND.TO has a market cap of 152.36M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TSND.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TSND.TO's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TSND.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to TSND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs BHSC.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, BHSC.CN has a market cap of 137.76M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while BHSC.CN trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BHSC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to BHSC.CN's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to BHSC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs GRIN.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, GRIN.CN has a market cap of 133.84M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while GRIN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GRIN.CN's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to GRIN.CN's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to GRIN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CRDL.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CRDL.TO has a market cap of 128.49M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CRDL.TO trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CRDL.TO's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CRDL.TO's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CRDL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs XLY.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, XLY.TO has a market cap of 118.17M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while XLY.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas XLY.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to XLY.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to XLY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs PLTH.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, PLTH.CN has a market cap of 113.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while PLTH.CN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to PLTH.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to PLTH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs GDNS.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, GDNS.CN has a market cap of 90.99M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while GDNS.CN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GDNS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to GDNS.CN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to GDNS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs MDP.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MDP.TO has a market cap of 86.78M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MDP.TO trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MDP.TO's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MDP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to MDP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs JUSH.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, JUSH.CN has a market cap of 85.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while JUSH.CN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas JUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to JUSH.CN's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to JUSH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TGOD.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TGOD.CN has a market cap of 62.18M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TGOD.CN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TGOD.CN's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TGOD.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to TGOD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs BNXT.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, BNXT.CN has a market cap of 60.10M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while BNXT.CN trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BNXT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to BNXT.CN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to BNXT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs STEM.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, STEM.CN has a market cap of 53.62M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while STEM.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas STEM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to STEM.CN's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to STEM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs INNO.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, INNO.CN has a market cap of 49.32M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while INNO.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas INNO.CN's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to INNO.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to INNO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AYR-A.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AYR-A.CN has a market cap of 39.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AYR-A.CN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AYR-A.CN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AYR-A.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to AYR-A.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs MRMD.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MRMD.CN has a market cap of 38.92M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MRMD.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MRMD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MRMD.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to MRMD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs HEXO.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, HEXO.TO has a market cap of 38.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while HEXO.TO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas HEXO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to HEXO.TO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to HEXO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CBST.NE Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CBST.NE has a market cap of 38.38M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CBST.NE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CBST.NE's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CBST.NE's ROE of +10.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to CBST.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs LABS.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, LABS.TO has a market cap of 37.36M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while LABS.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LABS.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to LABS.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to LABS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CHM.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CHM.CN has a market cap of 37.21M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CHM.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CHM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CHM.CN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CHM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs IAN.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, IAN.CN has a market cap of 33.68M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while IAN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas IAN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to IAN.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to IAN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AVCN.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AVCN.TO has a market cap of 31.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AVCN.TO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AVCN.TO's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AVCN.TO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to AVCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs EPIC.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, EPIC.CN has a market cap of 29.43M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while EPIC.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas EPIC.CN's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to EPIC.CN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to EPIC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs MMEN.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MMEN.CN has a market cap of 27.66M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MMEN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MMEN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MMEN.CN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to MMEN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs VEXT.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, VEXT.CN has a market cap of 27.23M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while VEXT.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VEXT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to VEXT.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to VEXT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs GWAY.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, GWAY.CN has a market cap of 24.99M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while GWAY.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GWAY.CN's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to GWAY.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to GWAY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CXXI.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CXXI.CN has a market cap of 24.61M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CXXI.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CXXI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CXXI.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CXXI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs YOUR.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, YOUR.CN has a market cap of 22.94M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while YOUR.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas YOUR.CN's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to YOUR.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to YOUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs VIN.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, VIN.CN has a market cap of 20.18M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while VIN.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VIN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to VIN.CN's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WLLW.TO has daily volatility of 15.38 and VIN.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
WLLW.TO vs CWEB.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CWEB.TO has a market cap of 19.83M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CWEB.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CWEB.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CWEB.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CWEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs RWB.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, RWB.CN has a market cap of 16.46M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while RWB.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas RWB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to RWB.CN's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO and RWB.CN have similar daily volatility (15.38).
WLLW.TO vs MRV.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MRV.TO has a market cap of 15.37M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MRV.TO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MRV.TO's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MRV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to MRV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs EXM.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, EXM.CN has a market cap of 15.15M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while EXM.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas EXM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to EXM.CN's ROE of -18.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to EXM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CHAL.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CHAL.CN has a market cap of 14.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CHAL.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CHAL.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CHAL.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CHAL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs RIV.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, RIV.CN has a market cap of 13.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while RIV.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas RIV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to RIV.CN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to RIV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs PWR.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, PWR.CN has a market cap of 13.16M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while PWR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PWR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to PWR.CN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to PWR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TRIP.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TRIP.CN has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TRIP.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TRIP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TRIP.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to TRIP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs ORI.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, ORI.CN has a market cap of 11.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while ORI.CN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ORI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to ORI.CN's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to ORI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs RVV.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, RVV.CN has a market cap of 10.46M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while RVV.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas RVV.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to RVV.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to RVV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs OILS.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, OILS.CN has a market cap of 9.98M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while OILS.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas OILS.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to OILS.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to OILS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CNFA.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CNFA.CN has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CNFA.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CNFA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CNFA.CN's ROE of -7.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CNFA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CTX.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CTX.TO has a market cap of 9.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CTX.TO trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CTX.TO's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CTX.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CTX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs VIVO.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, VIVO.TO has a market cap of 9.27M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while VIVO.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VIVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to VIVO.TO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to VIVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AUSA.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AUSA.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AUSA.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AUSA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AUSA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to AUSA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CLC.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CLC.CN has a market cap of 9.01M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CLC.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CLC.CN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CLC.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CLC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs MVMD.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MVMD.CN has a market cap of 8.81M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MVMD.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MVMD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MVMD.CN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to MVMD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AVNT.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AVNT.TO has a market cap of 8.66M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AVNT.TO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AVNT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AVNT.TO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to AVNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AH.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AH.TO has a market cap of 8.07M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AH.TO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AH.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AH.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to AH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs STHZ.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, STHZ.CN has a market cap of 7.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while STHZ.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas STHZ.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to STHZ.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to STHZ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs MOJO.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MOJO.CN has a market cap of 7.46M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MOJO.CN trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MOJO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MOJO.CN's ROE of -11.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to MOJO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs SPR.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, SPR.CN has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while SPR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SPR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to SPR.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to SPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CLSH.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CLSH.CN has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CLSH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CLSH.CN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CLSH.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CLSH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CDVA.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CDVA.CN has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CDVA.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CDVA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CDVA.CN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CDVA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs IMCC.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, IMCC.CN has a market cap of 7.00M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while IMCC.CN trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas IMCC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to IMCC.CN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to IMCC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs MYCO.NE Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MYCO.NE has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MYCO.NE trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MYCO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MYCO.NE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO and MYCO.NE have similar daily volatility (15.38).
WLLW.TO vs SNN.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, SNN.CN has a market cap of 6.08M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while SNN.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SNN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to SNN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to SNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AYUR.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AYUR.CN has a market cap of 5.84M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AYUR.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AYUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AYUR.CN's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO and AYUR.CN have similar daily volatility (15.38).
WLLW.TO vs SE.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, SE.CN has a market cap of 5.81M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while SE.CN trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SE.CN's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to SE.CN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to SE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs FH.NE Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, FH.NE has a market cap of 5.24M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while FH.NE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas FH.NE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to FH.NE's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to FH.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs BCBC.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, BCBC.CN has a market cap of 5.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while BCBC.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BCBC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to BCBC.CN's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to BCBC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CANN.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CANN.CN has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CANN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CANN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CANN.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CANN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs BHNG.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, BHNG.CN has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while BHNG.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BHNG.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to BHNG.CN's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to BHNG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs LOBE.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, LOBE.CN has a market cap of 4.58M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while LOBE.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LOBE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to LOBE.CN's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to LOBE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs FFNT.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, FFNT.CN has a market cap of 4.57M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while FFNT.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas FFNT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to FFNT.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to FFNT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs LUFF.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, LUFF.CN has a market cap of 4.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while LUFF.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LUFF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to LUFF.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WLLW.TO has daily volatility of 15.38 and LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
WLLW.TO vs TILT.NE Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TILT.NE has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TILT.NE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TILT.NE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TILT.NE's ROE of -10.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to TILT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs BAMM.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, BAMM.CN has a market cap of 3.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while BAMM.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BAMM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to BAMM.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to BAMM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs RMC.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, RMC.CN has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while RMC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas RMC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to RMC.CN's ROE of +8.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to RMC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs XBRA.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, XBRA.CN has a market cap of 3.38M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while XBRA.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas XBRA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to XBRA.CN's ROE of -20.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to XBRA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs THC.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, THC.CN has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while THC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas THC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to THC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to THC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs NBUD.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, NBUD.CN has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while NBUD.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NBUD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to NBUD.CN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to NBUD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs MSVN.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, MSVN.CN has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while MSVN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MSVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to MSVN.CN's ROE of +19.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to MSVN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AREV.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AREV.CN has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AREV.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AREV.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AREV.CN's ROE of +2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to AREV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs ASP.TO Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, ASP.TO has a market cap of 2.77M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while ASP.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ASP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to ASP.TO's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to ASP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs CFT.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, CFT.CN has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while CFT.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CFT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to CFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to CFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs IPOT.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, IPOT.CN has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while IPOT.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas IPOT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to IPOT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to IPOT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs PBF.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, PBF.CN has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while PBF.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PBF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to PBF.CN's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to PBF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs TGIF.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, TGIF.CN has a market cap of 2.45M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while TGIF.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TGIF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to TGIF.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is more volatile compared to TGIF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.
WLLW.TO vs AION.CN Comparison
WLLW.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLLW.TO stands at 4.35M. In comparison, AION.CN has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, WLLW.TO is priced at $0.03, while AION.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLLW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AION.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WLLW.TO's ROE is -21.00%, compared to AION.CN's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WLLW.TO is less volatile compared to AION.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLLW.TO.