Willcox International Holdings Inc
Willcox International Holdings Inc (WINH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WINH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINH | $0.05 | +0.00% | 2.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BABAF | $15.91 | -0.46% | 303.6B | 16.93 | $0.94 | +1.57% |
| MPNGY | $31.04 | -3.99% | 95.9B | 19.63 | $1.58 | N/A |
| MPNGF | $15.45 | -9.16% | 94.4B | 19.56 | $0.79 | N/A |
| ANCTF | $52.66 | -0.31% | 49.9B | 19.43 | $2.71 | +1.03% |
| JDCMF | $16.00 | -5.19% | 46.1B | 7.77 | $2.06 | +3.12% |
| YAHOY | $7.30 | +0.21% | 25.4B | 26.00 | $0.28 | N/A |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | +0.00% | 23.4B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | N/A |
| MTTRY | $1.03 | +16.21% | 12B | -49.58 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| RKUNY | $5.10 | -1.73% | 11B | -8.36 | -$0.61 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WINH vs BABAF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 303.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while BABAF trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check BABAF's competition here
WINH vs MPNGY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MPNGY trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MPNGY's competition here
WINH vs MPNGF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MPNGF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MPNGF's competition here
WINH vs ANCTF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ANCTF trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ANCTF's competition here
WINH vs JDCMF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while JDCMF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and JDCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDCMF's competition here
WINH vs YAHOY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while YAHOY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check YAHOY's competition here
WINH vs XXLLY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check XXLLY's competition here
WINH vs MTTRY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MTTRY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -49.58. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MTTRY's competition here
WINH vs RKUNY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while RKUNY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check RKUNY's competition here
WINH vs RKUNF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while RKUNF trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and RKUNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKUNF's competition here
WINH vs NCLTF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while NCLTF trades at $86.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is -75.04. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and NCLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCLTF's competition here
WINH vs NCLTY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while NCLTY trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is -77.18. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check NCLTY's competition here
WINH vs SNROF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SNROF trades at $39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and SNROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNROF's competition here
WINH vs HKTGF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check HKTGF's competition here
WINH vs SATLF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SATLF trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check SATLF's competition here
WINH vs SRTTY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SRTTY trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and SRTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRTTY's competition here
WINH vs MONOY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MONOY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 47.13. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MONOY's competition here
WINH vs DELHY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while DELHY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check DELHY's competition here
WINH vs ZLDSF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ZLDSF trades at $31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ZLDSF's competition here
WINH vs ALEGF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ALEGF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ALEGF's competition here
WINH vs ZLNDY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ZLNDY trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ZLNDY's competition here
WINH vs CDNTF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while CDNTF trades at $193.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and CDNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDNTF's competition here
WINH vs DFRYF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while DFRYF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 61.18. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check DFRYF's competition here
WINH vs CDNAF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while CDNAF trades at $135.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check CDNAF's competition here
WINH vs DLVHF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while DLVHF trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check DLVHF's competition here
WINH vs PETRY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check PETRY's competition here
WINH vs DUFRY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while DUFRY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check DUFRY's competition here
WINH vs JBHIF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while JBHIF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check JBHIF's competition here
WINH vs MONOF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MONOF trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MONOF's competition here
WINH vs ELPQF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ELPQF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and ELPQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELPQF's competition here
WINH vs JDDSF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while JDDSF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check JDDSF's competition here
WINH vs JDSPY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while JDSPY trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check JDSPY's competition here
WINH vs JUMSY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while JUMSY trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and JUMSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JUMSY's competition here
WINH vs JTKWY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while JTKWY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check JTKWY's competition here
WINH vs TKAYF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while TKAYF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check TKAYF's competition here
WINH vs SDIPF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SDIPF trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check SDIPF's competition here
WINH vs ZLPSF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ZLPSF's competition here
WINH vs JUMSF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and JUMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JUMSF's competition here
WINH vs ZOPLY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and ZOPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZOPLY's competition here
WINH vs DROOF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while DROOF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and DROOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DROOF's competition here
WINH vs DNLMY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while DNLMY trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and DNLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNLMY's competition here
WINH vs HNORY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while HNORY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check HNORY's competition here
WINH vs MCARY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MCARY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MCARY's competition here
WINH vs MRCIF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MRCIF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MRCIF's competition here
WINH vs MTAGF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MTAGF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is -45.09. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MTAGF's competition here
WINH vs FHNGY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while FHNGY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check FHNGY's competition here
WINH vs YMDAF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while YMDAF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check YMDAF's competition here
WINH vs WHTPF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while WHTPF trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 235.67. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and WHTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WHTPF's competition here
WINH vs PAHGF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while PAHGF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check PAHGF's competition here
WINH vs DSITF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while DSITF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check DSITF's competition here
WINH vs BTOOY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and BTOOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTOOY's competition here
WINH vs GPGNF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while GPGNF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check GPGNF's competition here
WINH vs MIZUF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MIZUF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MIZUF's competition here
WINH vs LEFUF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while LEFUF trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and LEFUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LEFUF's competition here
WINH vs MKRMF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and MKRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKRMF's competition here
WINH vs MGLUY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MGLUY trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check MGLUY's competition here
WINH vs GRUPF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and GRUPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRUPF's competition here
WINH vs FNXTF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 987.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check FNXTF's competition here
WINH vs SCCAF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and SCCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCCAF's competition here
WINH vs HWGC Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and HWGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWGC's competition here
WINH vs THGHY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while THGHY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and THGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THGHY's competition here
WINH vs THGPF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 588.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while THGPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and THGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THGPF's competition here
WINH vs ASOMY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 487.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ASOMY trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ASOMY's competition here
WINH vs HLFDF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check HLFDF's competition here
WINH vs CRFCF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 448.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while CRFCF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and CRFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRFCF's competition here
WINH vs KGGNF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and KGGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGGNF's competition here
WINH vs HLFDY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 425.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while HLFDY trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check HLFDY's competition here
WINH vs ASOMF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 421.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ASOMF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ASOMF's competition here
WINH vs KTYCF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 400.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while KTYCF trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 125.10. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and KTYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KTYCF's competition here
WINH vs SSILF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SSILF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and SSILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSILF's competition here
WINH vs BHOOY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while BHOOY trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check BHOOY's competition here
WINH vs BHHOF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and BHHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHHOF's competition here
WINH vs NBRNF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check NBRNF's competition here
WINH vs HMAGF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and HMAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMAGF's competition here
WINH vs SAXJY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SAXJY trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check SAXJY's competition here
WINH vs HKTVY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while HKTVY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check HKTVY's competition here
WINH vs YUMSF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while YUMSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and YUMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUMSF's competition here
WINH vs RDBBY Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check RDBBY's competition here
WINH vs BNNNF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check BNNNF's competition here
WINH vs AHAHF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check AHAHF's competition here
WINH vs WCRS Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while WCRS trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check WCRS's competition here
WINH vs IGDFF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while IGDFF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and IGDFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGDFF's competition here
WINH vs MHCRF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and MHCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHCRF's competition here
WINH vs SPGZ Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WINH has daily volatility of 0.00 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.Check SPGZ's competition here
WINH vs ADBGF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and ADBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBGF's competition here
WINH vs ACEHF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ACEHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ACEHF's competition here
WINH vs TWRKF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and TWRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWRKF's competition here
WINH vs IDGBF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and IDGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDGBF's competition here
WINH vs PXHI Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while PXHI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and PXHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXHI's competition here
WINH vs ARTZF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check ARTZF's competition here
WINH vs GLHD Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check GLHD's competition here
WINH vs CNVAF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check CNVAF's competition here
WINH vs RDBBF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while RDBBF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and RDBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDBBF's competition here
WINH vs FDIT Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and FDIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDIT's competition here
WINH vs GMELF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while GMELF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and GMELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMELF's competition here
WINH vs SNHO Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SNHO has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while SNHO trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNHO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to SNHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and SNHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNHO's competition here
WINH vs RLAB Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while RLAB trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check RLAB's competition here
WINH vs BWTL Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while BWTL trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH and BWTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWTL's competition here
WINH vs NEXCF Comparison July 2025
WINH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINH stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NEXCF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WINH is priced at $0.05, while NEXCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXCF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, WINH's ROE is -2.05%, compared to NEXCF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WINH is less volatile compared to NEXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINH.Check NEXCF's competition here