WiseTech Global Limited
WiseTech Global Limited WIGBY Peers
See (WIGBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIGBY | $64.01 | -9.71% | 21.2B | 106.68 | $0.60 | +0.20% |
| SAPGF | $306.00 | +0.66% | 357B | 55.23 | $5.54 | +0.86% |
| CNSWF | $3,606.16 | +0.42% | 76.4B | 102.59 | $35.15 | +0.11% |
| NEMKY | $26.00 | +26.83% | 75.1B | 74.29 | $0.35 | +0.48% |
| OBIIF | $127.00 | +336.43% | 55.9B | 124.51 | $1.02 | +0.18% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.1B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTF | $37.13 | +0.34% | 48.8B | 37.13 | $1.00 | +0.67% |
| DASTY | $36.95 | +0.35% | 48.5B | 36.95 | $1.00 | +0.70% |
| WTCHF | $70.63 | +2.62% | 23.4B | 117.72 | $0.60 | +0.15% |
| DIDIY | $4.60 | -1.92% | 20B | 115.00 | $0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WIGBY vs SAPGF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 357B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SAPGF trades at $306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 55.23. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs CNSWF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while CNSWF trades at $3,606.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 102.59. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NEMKY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NEMKY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 74.29. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs OBIIF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while OBIIF trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 124.51. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs INVUP Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs DASTF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while DASTF trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs DASTY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while DASTY trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs WTCHF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while WTCHF trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 117.72. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs DIDIY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while DIDIY trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs XROLF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while XROLF trades at $116.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 134.90. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SGGEF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SGGEF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SGPYY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SGPYY trades at $66.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs OCLCF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while OCLCF trades at $117.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NEMTF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NEMTF trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 72.44. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs LQAVF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LQAVF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while LQAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas LQAVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LQAVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to LQAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NCSYF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NCSYF trades at $165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ALMFF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs THNOF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TMNSF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TMNSF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs HOILF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs KGDEY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while KGDEY trades at $149.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -267.78. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TMSNY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TMSNY trades at $73.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs LIFX Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while LIFX trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 474.25. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs FNOXF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while FNOXF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SMCYY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SICRF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs KXSCF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while KXSCF trades at $143.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 420.98. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SRBEF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SRBEF trades at $213.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -75.07. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ASOZY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ASOZY trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TMIX Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TMIX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TMIX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TMIX's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMIX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to TMIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ZEUCF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ZEUCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ASOZF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ISDSF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ISDSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ISDSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ISDSF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISDSF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to ISDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs QTGPF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while QTGPF trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs WEMXF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while WEMXF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TMVWF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TMVWF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs UBMRF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TMVWY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TMVWY trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs KHOTF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ESKEF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs FREKF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while FREKF trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TMOAY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TMOAY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -57.80. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs MAGTF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs KNNNF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs IPEU Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while IPEU trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SWONF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs GBGPF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while GBGPF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 113.75. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs VOBIF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs EGHSF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while EGHSF trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs LTTHF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ESIGF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs BTRCF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 797M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while BTRCF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SLVFF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs BVSFF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TTMZF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TMOAF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TMOAF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NPACY Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NPACY trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NXLLF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NXLLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs PSSWF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while PSSWF trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs RWWI Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while RWWI trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NSWEF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs CHNVF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TCYSF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 465.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TCYSF trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs BLKLF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 462M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while BLKLF trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -78.29. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs BRDLF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NPACF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NPACF trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs CMDXF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 419.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while CMDXF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs IQGLF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs BHPA Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while BHPA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs GBUX Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 401.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while GBUX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -84.90. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs RPGHF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs LCHTF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while LCHTF trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs PLDIF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while PLDIF trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 58.80. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs JAPPF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ELMFF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs BCTCF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 320.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while BCTCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs RLLMF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while RLLMF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 207.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs PXPHF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while PXPHF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs DOTDF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs PTRRF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while PTRRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs IVUFF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs CIGMF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs ABXXF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 290.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while ABXXF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs LOQPF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while LOQPF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SMTEF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SMTEF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs EXMXF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs MCAP Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while MCAP trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs BAINF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while BAINF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs DAHLF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs LUPGF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LUPGF has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while LUPGF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas LUPGF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LUPGF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to LUPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs FXSRF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs NEOJF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while NEOJF trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs FBSFF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while FBSFF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs WONDF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs IARGF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs EXSPF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs CBSZF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs SYZLF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while SYZLF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -162.37. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.
WIGBY vs TCIIF Comparison
WIGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIGBY stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIGBY is priced at $64.01, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 106.68, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, WIGBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIGBY is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIGBY.