Westward Gold Inc.
Westward Gold Inc. (WGLIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WGLIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WGLIF | $0.10 | +3.31% | 12.2M | -9.29 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.80 | -1.41% | 72.1B | 14.74 | $0.19 | +1.86% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +804.81% |
| GFIOF | $25.38 | +0.00% | 22.7B | 18.39 | $1.38 | +2.15% |
| NESRF | $10.45 | -1.42% | 14.6B | 18.89 | $0.54 | +3.13% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $45.76 | -3.40% | 11B | 20.54 | $2.22 | +3.30% |
| CAHPF | $4.84 | +2.54% | 9.7B | 21.04 | $0.23 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
WGLIF vs ZIJMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ZIJMF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
WGLIF vs OPYGY Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check OPYGY's competition here
WGLIF vs GFIOF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while GFIOF trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check GFIOF's competition here
WGLIF vs NESRF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while NESRF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check NESRF's competition here
WGLIF vs NSTYY Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check NSTYY's competition here
WGLIF vs NCMGY Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check NCMGY's competition here
WGLIF vs NCMGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check NCMGF's competition here
WGLIF vs LUGDF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while LUGDF trades at $45.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check LUGDF's competition here
WGLIF vs CAHPF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while CAHPF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check CAHPF's competition here
WGLIF vs HGMCF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while HGMCF trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check HGMCF's competition here
WGLIF vs ZHAOF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
WGLIF vs AULGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check AULGF's competition here
WGLIF vs EDVMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while EDVMF trades at $30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -72.97. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check EDVMF's competition here
WGLIF vs SBYSF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while SBYSF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check SBYSF's competition here
WGLIF vs ARGTF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ARGTF trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -264.57. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ARGTF's competition here
WGLIF vs DGMLF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check DGMLF's competition here
WGLIF vs ZIJMY Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ZIJMY trades at $55.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
WGLIF vs OCANF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while OCANF trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check OCANF's competition here
WGLIF vs GRLGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check GRLGF's competition here
WGLIF vs PMNXF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while PMNXF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check PMNXF's competition here
WGLIF vs DPMLF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while DPMLF trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check DPMLF's competition here
WGLIF vs GSISF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while GSISF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check GSISF's competition here
WGLIF vs CRNLF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while CRNLF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check CRNLF's competition here
WGLIF vs KNTNF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while KNTNF trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check KNTNF's competition here
WGLIF vs TORXF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while TORXF trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check TORXF's competition here
WGLIF vs ELKMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ELKMF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ELKMF's competition here
WGLIF vs CELTF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check CELTF's competition here
WGLIF vs RGRNF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RGRNF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -283.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RGRNF's competition here
WGLIF vs ORAAF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ORAAF's competition here
WGLIF vs KOZAY Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check KOZAY's competition here
WGLIF vs RMLRF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RMLRF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RMLRF's competition here
WGLIF vs HCHDF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while HCHDF trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check HCHDF's competition here
WGLIF vs CXBMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check CXBMF's competition here
WGLIF vs WDOFF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while WDOFF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check WDOFF's competition here
WGLIF vs REDLF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while REDLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check REDLF's competition here
WGLIF vs WFRSF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while WFRSF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check WFRSF's competition here
WGLIF vs EOGSF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while EOGSF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check EOGSF's competition here
WGLIF vs OBNNF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check OBNNF's competition here
WGLIF vs PAFRF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check PAFRF's competition here
WGLIF vs DRDGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while DRDGF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check DRDGF's competition here
WGLIF vs MAUTF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while MAUTF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check MAUTF's competition here
WGLIF vs AURQF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check AURQF's competition here
WGLIF vs SNWGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while SNWGF trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -46.02. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check SNWGF's competition here
WGLIF vs HCHDY Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check HCHDY's competition here
WGLIF vs SVLKF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check SVLKF's competition here
WGLIF vs SGSVF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check SGSVF's competition here
WGLIF vs KRRGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check KRRGF's competition here
WGLIF vs MWSNF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 861.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while MWSNF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -66.80. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check MWSNF's competition here
WGLIF vs RMGGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 830.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RMGGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RMGGF's competition here
WGLIF vs RUPRF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 824.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RUPRF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -176.10. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RUPRF's competition here
WGLIF vs BELGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 811.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while BELGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check BELGF's competition here
WGLIF vs RMGGY Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RMGGY trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -29.23. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RMGGY's competition here
WGLIF vs PDIYF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 746.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while PDIYF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -28.46. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check PDIYF's competition here
WGLIF vs WTGRF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check WTGRF's competition here
WGLIF vs RGDFF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RGDFF's competition here
WGLIF vs ASGOF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 601.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ASGOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ASGOF's competition here
WGLIF vs MNSAF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 558.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while MNSAF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check MNSAF's competition here
WGLIF vs NVMLF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check NVMLF's competition here
WGLIF vs OSKA Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check OSKA's competition here
WGLIF vs RMLFF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 474.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RMLFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RMLFF's competition here
WGLIF vs ARNGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ARNGF's competition here
WGLIF vs RSRBF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 461.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RSRBF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 79.33. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RSRBF's competition here
WGLIF vs GUYGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 459.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while GUYGF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -63.57. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check GUYGF's competition here
WGLIF vs GDRZF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 438.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while GDRZF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check GDRZF's competition here
WGLIF vs RIOFF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 431.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while RIOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 101.45. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check RIOFF's competition here
WGLIF vs ECRTF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 419M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ECRTF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ECRTF's competition here
WGLIF vs KSKGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while KSKGF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check KSKGF's competition here
WGLIF vs ORZCF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 409.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ORZCF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ORZCF's competition here
WGLIF vs NRGOF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, NRGOF has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while NRGOF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas NRGOF's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NRGOF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to NRGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check NRGOF's competition here
WGLIF vs LMGDF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check LMGDF's competition here
WGLIF vs THXPF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while THXPF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check THXPF's competition here
WGLIF vs ELEMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 353.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ELEMF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ELEMF's competition here
WGLIF vs TPRXF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check TPRXF's competition here
WGLIF vs MNDJF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 341.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while MNDJF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check MNDJF's competition here
WGLIF vs MAKOF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 331M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while MAKOF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check MAKOF's competition here
WGLIF vs OMGGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 318.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while OMGGF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -26.82. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check OMGGF's competition here
WGLIF vs PROBF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while PROBF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -12.97. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check PROBF's competition here
WGLIF vs OGNRF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check OGNRF's competition here
WGLIF vs ALKEF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 287.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ALKEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ALKEF's competition here
WGLIF vs AGXKF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while AGXKF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check AGXKF's competition here
WGLIF vs MGDPF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check MGDPF's competition here
WGLIF vs OSIIF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check OSIIF's competition here
WGLIF vs ERRSF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check ERRSF's competition here
WGLIF vs FDMIF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while FDMIF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -56.75. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check FDMIF's competition here
WGLIF vs STPGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while STPGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check STPGF's competition here
WGLIF vs JAGGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 208.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while JAGGF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -32.87. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check JAGGF's competition here
WGLIF vs WRLGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while WRLGF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check WRLGF's competition here
WGLIF vs HSTXF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 196.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while HSTXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check HSTXF's competition here
WGLIF vs GGAZF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while GGAZF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check GGAZF's competition here
WGLIF vs SAAGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check SAAGF's competition here
WGLIF vs CNLMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check CNLMF's competition here
WGLIF vs MAIFF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while MAIFF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check MAIFF's competition here
WGLIF vs STBMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while STBMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check STBMF's competition here
WGLIF vs DCCNF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check DCCNF's competition here
WGLIF vs SRBIF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while SRBIF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check SRBIF's competition here
WGLIF vs CNMXF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check CNMXF's competition here
WGLIF vs SITKF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while SITKF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -46.90. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check SITKF's competition here
WGLIF vs THSGF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while THSGF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -67.28. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check THSGF's competition here
WGLIF vs EEYMF Comparison July 2025
WGLIF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WGLIF stands at 12.2M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WGLIF is priced at $0.10, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WGLIF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.29, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WGLIF's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, WGLIF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WGLIF.Check EEYMF's competition here