Wi-Fi Wireless ltd
Wi-Fi Wireless ltd (WFWRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFWRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFWRF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DTEGF | $37.09 | +0.00% | 181.8B | 12.88 | $2.88 | +2.81% |
| DTEGY | $36.42 | -0.38% | 178.7B | 12.63 | $2.88 | +2.73% |
| SFTBY | $38.57 | +0.08% | 109.6B | 14.57 | $2.64 | +0.25% |
| SFTBF | $75.20 | -0.34% | 108.1B | 14.14 | $5.32 | +0.40% |
| NTTYY | $25.40 | -0.39% | 84.4B | 12.62 | $2.02 | +2.47% |
| NPPXF | $1.14 | +9.62% | 82.7B | 12.50 | $0.08 | +3.56% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SFBQF | $1.44 | +8.27% | 68.5B | 20.55 | $0.07 | +4.15% |
| AMOVF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 66.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WFWRF vs DTEGF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 181.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while DTEGF trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check DTEGF's competition here
WFWRF vs DTEGY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while DTEGY trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check DTEGY's competition here
WFWRF vs SFTBY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 109.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SFTBY trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SFTBY's competition here
WFWRF vs SFTBF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SFTBF trades at $75.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SFTBF's competition here
WFWRF vs NTTYY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while NTTYY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check NTTYY's competition here
WFWRF vs NPPXF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while NPPXF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check NPPXF's competition here
WFWRF vs AMXVF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AMXVF's competition here
WFWRF vs SFBQF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SFBQF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SFBQF's competition here
WFWRF vs AMOVF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AMOVF's competition here
WFWRF vs KDDIY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while KDDIY trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check KDDIY's competition here
WFWRF vs KDDIF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while KDDIF trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check KDDIF's competition here
WFWRF vs SNGNF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SNGNF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SNGNF's competition here
WFWRF vs SGAPY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SGAPY trades at $30.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SGAPY's competition here
WFWRF vs CLLNY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while CLLNY trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -446.12. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check CLLNY's competition here
WFWRF vs FNCTF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while FNCTF trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check FNCTF's competition here
WFWRF vs TLGPY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TLGPY trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 33.61. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TLGPY's competition here
WFWRF vs SCMWY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SCMWY trades at $70.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SCMWY's competition here
WFWRF vs SWZCF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SWZCF trades at $696.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SWZCF's competition here
WFWRF vs TTRAF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TTRAF trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TTRAF's competition here
WFWRF vs TEFOF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TEFOF trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -49.67. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TEFOF's competition here
WFWRF vs VODPF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while VODPF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check VODPF's competition here
WFWRF vs AVIFY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AVIFY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AVIFY's competition here
WFWRF vs BTGOF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BTGOF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BTGOF's competition here
WFWRF vs CTOWY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check CTOWY's competition here
WFWRF vs TELNF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TELNF trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TELNF's competition here
WFWRF vs TELNY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TELNY trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TELNY's competition here
WFWRF vs CHWRF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while CHWRF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check CHWRF's competition here
WFWRF vs RCIAF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while RCIAF trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check RCIAF's competition here
WFWRF vs KKPNY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while KKPNY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check KKPNY's competition here
WFWRF vs KKPNF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while KKPNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check KKPNF's competition here
WFWRF vs AVIVF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AVIVF's competition here
WFWRF vs ELMUY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check ELMUY's competition here
WFWRF vs TLKMF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TLKMF's competition here
WFWRF vs AVIKF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AVIKF's competition here
WFWRF vs VDMCY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while VDMCY trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check VDMCY's competition here
WFWRF vs MTNOY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while MTNOY trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check MTNOY's competition here
WFWRF vs SJRWF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SJRWF's competition here
WFWRF vs TLSNF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TLSNF's competition here
WFWRF vs HLTOY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while HLTOY trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check HLTOY's competition here
WFWRF vs TLSNY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TLSNY trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TLSNY's competition here
WFWRF vs MTNOF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while MTNOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check MTNOF's competition here
WFWRF vs BCEPF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BCEPF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BCEPF's competition here
WFWRF vs TCPFF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TCPFF's competition here
WFWRF vs BECEF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BECEF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BECEF's competition here
WFWRF vs VODAF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check VODAF's competition here
WFWRF vs HKTTY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while HKTTY trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check HKTTY's competition here
WFWRF vs TIAIY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TIAIY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TIAIY's competition here
WFWRF vs TIAOF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TIAOF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TIAOF's competition here
WFWRF vs TLTZY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TLTZY trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TLTZY's competition here
WFWRF vs BCPPF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BCPPF's competition here
WFWRF vs TLTZF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TLTZF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TLTZF's competition here
WFWRF vs LBRDB Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while LBRDB trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check LBRDB's competition here
WFWRF vs AAFRF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AAFRF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AAFRF's competition here
WFWRF vs BCEXF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BCEXF's competition here
WFWRF vs DIGBF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check DIGBF's competition here
WFWRF vs TIAJF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TIAJF's competition here
WFWRF vs ELMUF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check ELMUF's competition here
WFWRF vs FRTAY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check FRTAY's competition here
WFWRF vs HKTTF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while HKTTF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check HKTTF's competition here
WFWRF vs TELDF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TELDF's competition here
WFWRF vs SHNUF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SHNUF's competition here
WFWRF vs TELDY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TELDY's competition here
WFWRF vs AARTY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AARTY's competition here
WFWRF vs SOBKY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SOBKY trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SOBKY's competition here
WFWRF vs QBCAF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while QBCAF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check QBCAF's competition here
WFWRF vs QBCRF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while QBCRF trades at $28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check QBCRF's competition here
WFWRF vs MYTEF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check MYTEF's competition here
WFWRF vs HLTOF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check HLTOF's competition here
WFWRF vs PCCWY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while PCCWY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -149.20. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check PCCWY's competition here
WFWRF vs MAXSF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check MAXSF's competition here
WFWRF vs PCWLF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while PCWLF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -71.26. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check PCWLF's competition here
WFWRF vs AXXTF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check AXXTF's competition here
WFWRF vs BZQIF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BZQIF's competition here
WFWRF vs BZQIY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BZQIY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BZQIY's competition here
WFWRF vs PTITF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while PTITF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check PTITF's competition here
WFWRF vs TKAGY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TKAGY's competition here
WFWRF vs TRKNY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TRKNY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TRKNY's competition here
WFWRF vs PHTCF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check PHTCF's competition here
WFWRF vs UDIRF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -75.93. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check UDIRF's competition here
WFWRF vs GTMEY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check GTMEY's competition here
WFWRF vs CUCSF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while CUCSF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check CUCSF's competition here
WFWRF vs FRTAF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check FRTAF's competition here
WFWRF vs TCMFF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TCMFF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TCMFF's competition here
WFWRF vs TFAOF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TFAOF's competition here
WFWRF vs IIJIF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while IIJIF trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check IIJIF's competition here
WFWRF vs BGAOF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BGAOF's competition here
WFWRF vs IIJIY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while IIJIY trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check IIJIY's competition here
WFWRF vs MICCF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check MICCF's competition here
WFWRF vs TACYY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TACYY's competition here
WFWRF vs CUCSY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while CUCSY trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check CUCSY's competition here
WFWRF vs TRKNF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TRKNF's competition here
WFWRF vs TLGHY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check TLGHY's competition here
WFWRF vs PTXKY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while PTXKY trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check PTXKY's competition here
WFWRF vs PTTWF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check PTTWF's competition here
WFWRF vs BGAOY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while BGAOY trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check BGAOY's competition here
WFWRF vs SPKKY Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while SPKKY trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check SPKKY's competition here
WFWRF vs NZTCF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while NZTCF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check NZTCF's competition here
WFWRF vs GMOYF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check GMOYF's competition here
WFWRF vs CLCMF Comparison July 2025
WFWRF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFWRF stands at 0. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFWRF is priced at $0.00, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFWRF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, WFWRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFWRF is more volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFWRF.Check CLCMF's competition here