Direxion Work From Home ETF
Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFH | $67.88 | -1.39% | 20.4M | 27.89 | $2.43 | +0.94% |
| VFINX | $587.58 | -0.12% | 1.5T | 27.43 | $21.42 | +1.19% |
| VOO | $580.95 | -0.39% | 1.5T | 27.35 | $21.24 | +1.19% |
| VITSX | $151.96 | -0.14% | 1.3T | 26.73 | $5.68 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $151.93 | -0.14% | 1.3T | 26.73 | $5.68 | +1.18% |
| FXAIX | $221.09 | -0.13% | 665.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTI | $310.93 | -0.42% | 644.8B | 26.63 | $11.68 | +1.19% |
| IVV | $635.04 | -0.39% | 639.6B | 27.32 | $23.25 | +1.26% |
| SPY | $631.98 | -0.39% | 580B | 27.32 | $23.13 | +1.13% |
| VTSNX | $148.27 | -0.87% | 506.4B | 16.04 | $9.25 | +2.83% |
Stock Comparison
WFH vs VFINX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VFINX trades at $587.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VFINX's competition here
WFH vs VOO Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VOO trades at $580.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VOO's competition here
WFH vs VITSX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VITSX trades at $151.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VITSX's competition here
WFH vs VTSAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTSAX trades at $151.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VTSAX's competition here
WFH vs FXAIX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 665.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while FXAIX trades at $221.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check FXAIX's competition here
WFH vs VTI Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 644.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTI trades at $310.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VTI's competition here
WFH vs IVV Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 639.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while IVV trades at $635.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check IVV's competition here
WFH vs SPY Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 580B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while SPY trades at $631.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check SPY's competition here
WFH vs VTSNX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 506.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTSNX trades at $148.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VTSNX's competition here
WFH vs VXUS Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 502.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VXUS trades at $68.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VXUS's competition here
WFH vs VMCPX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 360.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VMCPX trades at $386.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VMCPX's competition here
WFH vs VIMAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 330.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VIMAX trades at $355.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VIMAX's competition here
WFH vs VIIIX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 320.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VIIIX trades at $517.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VIIIX's competition here
WFH vs VINIX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 320.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VINIX trades at $517.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VINIX's competition here
WFH vs RGAGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 297.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RGAGX trades at $84.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RGAGX's competition here
WFH vs GAFFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 297.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while GAFFX trades at $84.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check GAFFX's competition here
WFH vs AGTHX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 297B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AGTHX trades at $83.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AGTHX's competition here
WFH vs GFAFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 294.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while GFAFX trades at $83.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check GFAFX's competition here
WFH vs RGABX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RGABX trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RGABX's competition here
WFH vs RGAAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 259.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RGAAX trades at $73.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RGAAX's competition here
WFH vs GFACX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 253.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while GFACX trades at $71.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check GFACX's competition here
WFH vs ABALX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while ABALX trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check ABALX's competition here
WFH vs AMBFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AMBFX trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AMBFX's competition here
WFH vs AFMBX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AFMBX trades at $37.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AFMBX's competition here
WFH vs RLBGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RLBGX trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RLBGX's competition here
WFH vs BALFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while BALFX trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check BALFX's competition here
WFH vs VDIPX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 232.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VDIPX trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VDIPX's competition here
WFH vs VTMNX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 232.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTMNX trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VTMNX's competition here
WFH vs VEA Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 230.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VEA trades at $56.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VEA's competition here
WFH vs QQQ Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 222.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while QQQ trades at $565.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check QQQ's competition here
WFH vs VB Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VB trades at $241.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VB's competition here
WFH vs BX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 207.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while BX trades at $172.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 46.72. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check BX's competition here
WFH vs VTV Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 193.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTV trades at $177.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH and VTV have similar daily volatility (1.28).Check VTV's competition here
WFH vs VO Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 191.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VO trades at $285.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VO's competition here
WFH vs C-PN Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 176.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while C-PN trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check C-PN's competition here
WFH vs BLK Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while BLK trades at $1,105.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check BLK's competition here
WFH vs FCNKX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 166.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while FCNKX trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check FCNKX's competition here
WFH vs FCNTX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while FCNTX trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check FCNTX's competition here
WFH vs RICBX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RICBX trades at $63.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RICBX's competition here
WFH vs AIVSX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AIVSX trades at $64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AIVSX's competition here
WFH vs AICCX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AICCX trades at $63.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AICCX's competition here
WFH vs AICFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AICFX trades at $64.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AICFX's competition here
WFH vs RICAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RICAX trades at $63.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RICAX's competition here
WFH vs FCTDX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 163.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while FCTDX trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check FCTDX's competition here
WFH vs ANWPX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while ANWPX trades at $70.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check ANWPX's competition here
WFH vs RNPGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RNPGX trades at $70.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RNPGX's competition here
WFH vs NPFFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while NPFFX trades at $69.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check NPFFX's competition here
WFH vs FNPFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 155B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while FNPFX trades at $70.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check FNPFX's competition here
WFH vs CFNAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 152.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while CFNAX trades at $89.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check CFNAX's competition here
WFH vs ANCFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while ANCFX trades at $89.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check ANCFX's competition here
WFH vs AFIFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AFIFX trades at $89.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AFIFX's competition here
WFH vs AWSHX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AWSHX trades at $64.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AWSHX's competition here
WFH vs FWMIX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while FWMIX trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check FWMIX's competition here
WFH vs RWMFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RWMFX trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RWMFX's competition here
WFH vs CWMAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while CWMAX trades at $64.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check CWMAX's competition here
WFH vs WSHFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while WSHFX trades at $64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check WSHFX's competition here
WFH vs WSHCX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while WSHCX trades at $63.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check WSHCX's competition here
WFH vs RWMBX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RWMBX trades at $63.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RWMBX's competition here
WFH vs IEFA Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while IEFA trades at $81.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check IEFA's competition here
WFH vs AEPFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AEPFX trades at $60.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AEPFX's competition here
WFH vs RERGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RERGX trades at $60.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RERGX's competition here
WFH vs RERHX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RERHX trades at $59.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RERHX's competition here
WFH vs AEGFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AEGFX trades at $59.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AEGFX's competition here
WFH vs AEPGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AEPGX trades at $60.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AEPGX's competition here
WFH vs KKR Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while KKR trades at $146.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 63.18. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check KKR's competition here
WFH vs AGG Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AGG trades at $98.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 125.77. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AGG's competition here
WFH vs IWF Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while IWF trades at $440.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check IWF's competition here
WFH vs VWENX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VWENX trades at $79.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VWENX's competition here
WFH vs VWELX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VWELX trades at $45.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VWELX's competition here
WFH vs JLGMX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 114.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while JLGMX trades at $91.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check JLGMX's competition here
WFH vs JLGRX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while JLGRX trades at $89.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check JLGRX's competition here
WFH vs SEEGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while SEEGX trades at $86.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check SEEGX's competition here
WFH vs VSCIX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 112.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VSCIX trades at $116.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VSCIX's competition here
WFH vs NAESX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 112.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while NAESX trades at $116.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check NAESX's competition here
WFH vs FSKAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while FSKAX trades at $174.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check FSKAX's competition here
WFH vs VTTHX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTTHX trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VTTHX's competition here
WFH vs BN Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while BN trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 231.17. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check BN's competition here
WFH vs VUG Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VUG trades at $455.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 38.76. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VUG's competition here
WFH vs VITAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VITAX trades at $355.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VITAX's competition here
WFH vs VGT Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VGT trades at $690.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VGT's competition here
WFH vs VDADX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VDADX trades at $56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VDADX's competition here
WFH vs VIG Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VIG trades at $205.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VIG's competition here
WFH vs TBCIX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while TBCIX trades at $207.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check TBCIX's competition here
WFH vs TRBCX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while TRBCX trades at $206.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check TRBCX's competition here
WFH vs VTHRX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTHRX trades at $41.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VTHRX's competition here
WFH vs VFORX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VFORX trades at $47.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VFORX's competition here
WFH vs PABGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while PABGX trades at $199.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 37.64. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check PABGX's competition here
WFH vs BAM Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while BAM trades at $61.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check BAM's competition here
WFH vs VTIVX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VTIVX trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VTIVX's competition here
WFH vs IJH Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while IJH trades at $63.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check IJH's competition here
WFH vs DODGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while DODGX trades at $271.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check DODGX's competition here
WFH vs RRBGX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RRBGX trades at $185.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 39.34. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RRBGX's competition here
WFH vs RAFFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while RAFFX trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check RAFFX's competition here
WFH vs VIEIX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VIEIX trades at $150.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VIEIX's competition here
WFH vs PRUFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while PRUFX trades at $114.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check PRUFX's competition here
WFH vs PRGFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while PRGFX trades at $114.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check PRGFX's competition here
WFH vs VEMAX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while VEMAX trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check VEMAX's competition here
WFH vs AMCPX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AMCPX trades at $45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AMCPX's competition here
WFH vs AMPFX Comparison July 2025
WFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFH stands at 20.4M. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFH is priced at $67.88, while AMPFX trades at $44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFH currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, WFH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFH is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFH.Check AMPFX's competition here