Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares WEBS Peers
See (WEBS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBS | $23.01 | -3.64% | 8.5M | N/A | N/A | +23.65% |
| VFINX | $549.25 | -0.52% | 1.4T | 25.86 | $21.24 | +1.26% |
| VOO | $550.59 | +1.01% | 1.3T | 26.13 | $21.07 | +1.26% |
| VITSX | $142.18 | -0.46% | 1.2T | 25.15 | $5.65 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $142.15 | -0.46% | 1.2T | 25.15 | $5.65 | +0.01% |
| VTI | $295.08 | +1.15% | 611.9B | 25.43 | $11.61 | +1.27% |
| FXAIX | $206.67 | -0.52% | 591B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IVV | $601.99 | +1.01% | 590.6B | 25.90 | $23.24 | +1.29% |
| SPY | $599.04 | +1.01% | 549.8B | 26.10 | $22.95 | +1.19% |
| VXUS | $68.02 | +0.28% | 475.4B | 16.30 | $4.17 | +2.87% |
Stock Comparison
WEBS vs VFINX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VFINX trades at $549.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VOO Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VOO trades at $550.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VITSX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VITSX trades at $142.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTSAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTSAX trades at $142.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTI Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 611.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTI trades at $295.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs FXAIX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 591B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while FXAIX trades at $206.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs IVV Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 590.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while IVV trades at $601.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs SPY Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 549.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while SPY trades at $599.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VXUS Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 475.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VXUS trades at $68.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTSNX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 473.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTSNX trades at $145.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VMCPX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 342B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VMCPX trades at $367.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VIMAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 313.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VIMAX trades at $336.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VINIX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 288.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VINIX trades at $483.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VIIIX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 288.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VIIIX trades at $483.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs GFAFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 278.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while GFAFX trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RGAGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 276.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RGAGX trades at $77.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs GAFFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 275.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while GAFFX trades at $77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AGTHX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 275.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AGTHX trades at $77.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RGABX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 244.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RGABX trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AFMBX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AFMBX trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs ABALX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while ABALX trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AMBFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AMBFX trades at $35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RGAAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 240.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RGAAX trades at $68.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs GFACX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 235.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while GFACX trades at $66.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs BALFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 232.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while BALFX trades at $35.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RLBGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 232B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RLBGX trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VEA Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 225.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VEA trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VDIPX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 224.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VDIPX trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTMNX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 213.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTMNX trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs QQQ Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 208.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while QQQ trades at $529.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VB Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VB trades at $232.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTV Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 185.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTV trades at $173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VO Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 176.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VO trades at $274.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs BX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while BX trades at $140.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RICBX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RICBX trades at $60.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AIVSX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AIVSX trades at $60.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs FCNTX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while FCNTX trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs BLK Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 153.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while BLK trades at $989.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RNPGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RNPGX trades at $67.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs NPFFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while NPFFX trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs ANWPX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while ANWPX trades at $67.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RICAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RICAX trades at $60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AICFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AICFX trades at $60.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs FCTDX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while FCTDX trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AICCX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AICCX trades at $59.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs FCNKX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while FCNKX trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AWSHX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AWSHX trades at $64.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs FWMIX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while FWMIX trades at $64.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RWMFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RWMFX trades at $64.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs CWMAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 144.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while CWMAX trades at $64.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs WSHFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while WSHFX trades at $64.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AFIFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AFIFX trades at $85.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs ANCFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while ANCFX trades at $85.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs C-PN Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while C-PN trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs WSHCX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while WSHCX trades at $63.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RWMBX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 141.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RWMBX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs FNPFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while FNPFX trades at $67.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs IEFA Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while IEFA trades at $83.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs CFNAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while CFNAX trades at $85.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AEPGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AEPGX trades at $60.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RERGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RERGX trades at $60.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RERHX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 126.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RERHX trades at $60.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AEGFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 126.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AEGFX trades at $60.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AEPFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AEPFX trades at $60.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AGG Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AGG trades at $97.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 124.09. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs IWF Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while IWF trades at $407.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs KKR Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while KKR trades at $123.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 52.97. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VWENX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VWENX trades at $75.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VWELX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VWELX trades at $43.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs JLGRX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while JLGRX trades at $83.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VSCIX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VSCIX trades at $110.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs NAESX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while NAESX trades at $110.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs FSKAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while FSKAX trades at $163.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VIG Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VIG trades at $200.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VDADX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VDADX trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTTHX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTTHX trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VUG Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VUG trades at $421.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs SEEGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while SEEGX trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs JLGMX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while JLGMX trades at $84.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VITAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VITAX trades at $318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs TBCIX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while TBCIX trades at $192.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTHRX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTHRX trades at $39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs TRBCX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while TRBCX trades at $191.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs IJH Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while IJH trades at $61.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs BAM Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while BAM trades at $57.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs PABGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while PABGX trades at $184.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 36.51. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VFORX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VFORX trades at $45.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs DODGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while DODGX trades at $263.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VGT Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VGT trades at $626.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VTIVX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VTIVX trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RAFFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RAFFX trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs BN Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while BN trades at $58.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 203.07. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs RRBGX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while RRBGX trades at $172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs AMCPX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while AMCPX trades at $44.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VIEIX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VIEIX trades at $141.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs VEMAX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while VEMAX trades at $39.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs PRUFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while PRUFX trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 38.06. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs EFA Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, EFA has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while EFA trades at $89.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFA's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to EFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.
WEBS vs PRGFX Comparison
WEBS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBS is priced at $23.01, while PRGFX trades at $106.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 38.06. In terms of profitability, WEBS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBS is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBS.