Water Intelligence plc
Water Intelligence plc (WATR.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WATR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATR.L | £314.00 | -1.88% | 59.8M | 15.70 | £0.20 | N/A |
| 0HYJ.L | £223.58 | +0.36% | 90.3B | 19.80 | £11.29 | +0.70% |
| 0II3.L | £244.53 | +0.32% | 30.3B | 39.57 | £6.18 | +0.69% |
| 0QMI.L | £2,301.00 | +0.65% | 16.3B | 28.13 | £81.79 | +3.85% |
| 0HHB.L | £43.12 | -0.87% | 11.3B | 75.92 | £0.57 | +0.95% |
| RTO.L | £346.60 | -0.43% | 8.7B | 28.88 | £0.12 | +1.93% |
| ITRK.L | £4,920.00 | +0.45% | 7.7B | 23.10 | £2.13 | +3.18% |
| 0KX9.L | £37.96 | -1.67% | 3.9B | 6.43 | £5.90 | +6.01% |
| 0KGY.L | £208.00 | +0.24% | 3.9B | 18.07 | £11.51 | +2.84% |
| 0QQE.L | £57.20 | -1.72% | 3.7B | 16.63 | £3.44 | +4.11% |
Stock Comparison
WATR.L vs 0HYJ.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0HYJ.L has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0HYJ.L trades at £223.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0HYJ.L's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HYJ.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0HYJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0HYJ.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0II3.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0II3.L has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0II3.L trades at £244.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0II3.L's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0II3.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0II3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0II3.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0QMI.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0QMI.L has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0QMI.L trades at £2,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0QMI.L's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QMI.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0QMI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0QMI.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0HHB.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0HHB.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0HHB.L trades at £43.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0HHB.L's P/E ratio is 75.92. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HHB.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0HHB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0HHB.L's competition here
WATR.L vs RTO.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, RTO.L has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while RTO.L trades at £346.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas RTO.L's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTO.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to RTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check RTO.L's competition here
WATR.L vs ITRK.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, ITRK.L has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while ITRK.L trades at £4,920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas ITRK.L's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITRK.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to ITRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check ITRK.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0KX9.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0KX9.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0KX9.L trades at £37.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0KX9.L's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0KX9.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0KX9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0KX9.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0KGY.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0KGY.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0KGY.L trades at £208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0KGY.L's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0KGY.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0KGY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0KGY.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0QQE.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0QQE.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0QQE.L trades at £57.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0QQE.L's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QQE.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0QQE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0QQE.L's competition here
WATR.L vs IWG.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, IWG.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while IWG.L trades at £219.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas IWG.L's P/E ratio is 219.60. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IWG.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to IWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check IWG.L's competition here
WATR.L vs SRP.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, SRP.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while SRP.L trades at £206.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SRP.L's P/E ratio is 51.65. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to SRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check SRP.L's competition here
WATR.L vs MTO.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, MTO.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while MTO.L trades at £137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MTO.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTO.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to MTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check MTO.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0IX0.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0IX0.L has a market cap of 875.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0IX0.L trades at £29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0IX0.L's P/E ratio is 58.53. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IX0.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0IX0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0IX0.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0HDQ.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0HDQ.L has a market cap of 795.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0HDQ.L trades at £34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0HDQ.L's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HDQ.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0HDQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0HDQ.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0DZJ.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0DZJ.L has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0DZJ.L trades at £64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0DZJ.L's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0DZJ.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0DZJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0DZJ.L's competition here
WATR.L vs JSG.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, JSG.L has a market cap of 558.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while JSG.L trades at £139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas JSG.L's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to JSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check JSG.L's competition here
WATR.L vs RST.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, RST.L has a market cap of 356.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while RST.L trades at £263.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas RST.L's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RST.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to RST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check RST.L's competition here
WATR.L vs HYVE.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, HYVE.L has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while HYVE.L trades at £120.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas HYVE.L's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYVE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to HYVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check HYVE.L's competition here
WATR.L vs CPI.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, CPI.L has a market cap of 348.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while CPI.L trades at £306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CPI.L's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPI.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to CPI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check CPI.L's competition here
WATR.L vs DWF.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, DWF.L has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while DWF.L trades at £100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas DWF.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to DWF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check DWF.L's competition here
WATR.L vs RWS.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, RWS.L has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while RWS.L trades at £86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas RWS.L's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to RWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check RWS.L's competition here
WATR.L vs DLAR.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, DLAR.L has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while DLAR.L trades at £130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas DLAR.L's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLAR.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to DLAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check DLAR.L's competition here
WATR.L vs FRAN.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, FRAN.L has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while FRAN.L trades at £126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FRAN.L's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRAN.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to FRAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check FRAN.L's competition here
WATR.L vs PPHC.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, PPHC.L has a market cap of 213.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while PPHC.L trades at £171.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas PPHC.L's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPHC.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to PPHC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check PPHC.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0QME.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0QME.L has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0QME.L trades at £106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0QME.L's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QME.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0QME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0QME.L's competition here
WATR.L vs KEYS.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, KEYS.L has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while KEYS.L trades at £619.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas KEYS.L's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEYS.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to KEYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check KEYS.L's competition here
WATR.L vs BEG.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, BEG.L has a market cap of 191.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while BEG.L trades at £120.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BEG.L's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BEG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to BEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check BEG.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0RQI.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0RQI.L has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0RQI.L trades at £3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0RQI.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RQI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0RQI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0RQI.L's competition here
WATR.L vs KGH.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, KGH.L has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while KGH.L trades at £171.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas KGH.L's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to KGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check KGH.L's competition here
WATR.L vs INSE.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, INSE.L has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while INSE.L trades at £80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas INSE.L's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INSE.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to INSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check INSE.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0RNP.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0RNP.L has a market cap of 122M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0RNP.L trades at £13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0RNP.L's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RNP.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0RNP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0RNP.L's competition here
WATR.L vs SFT.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, SFT.L has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while SFT.L trades at £28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SFT.L's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFT.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to SFT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check SFT.L's competition here
WATR.L vs GRA.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, GRA.L has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while GRA.L trades at £11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas GRA.L's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRA.L's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to GRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check GRA.L's competition here
WATR.L vs CTG.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, CTG.L has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while CTG.L trades at £105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CTG.L's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to CTG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check CTG.L's competition here
WATR.L vs VNET.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, VNET.L has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while VNET.L trades at £84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas VNET.L's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNET.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to VNET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check VNET.L's competition here
WATR.L vs INCE.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, INCE.L has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while INCE.L trades at £5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas INCE.L's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INCE.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to INCE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check INCE.L's competition here
WATR.L vs MIND.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, MIND.L has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while MIND.L trades at £17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MIND.L's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIND.L's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to MIND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check MIND.L's competition here
WATR.L vs DSW.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, DSW.L has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while DSW.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas DSW.L's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSW.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is less volatile compared to DSW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check DSW.L's competition here
WATR.L vs CPP.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, CPP.L has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while CPP.L trades at £156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CPP.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPP.L's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to CPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check CPP.L's competition here
WATR.L vs REAT.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, REAT.L has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while REAT.L trades at £48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas REAT.L's P/E ratio is -24.25. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REAT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to REAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check REAT.L's competition here
WATR.L vs CEPS.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, CEPS.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while CEPS.L trades at £22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CEPS.L's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEPS.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to CEPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check CEPS.L's competition here
WATR.L vs RBGP.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, RBGP.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while RBGP.L trades at £0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas RBGP.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBGP.L's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to RBGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check RBGP.L's competition here
WATR.L vs HSV.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, HSV.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while HSV.L trades at £1,198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas HSV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSV.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WATR.L has daily volatility of 6.25 and HSV.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check HSV.L's competition here
WATR.L vs 0Q82.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, 0Q82.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while 0Q82.L trades at £18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas 0Q82.L's P/E ratio is 95.34. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0Q82.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to 0Q82.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check 0Q82.L's competition here
WATR.L vs GYG.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, GYG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while GYG.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas GYG.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GYG.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is less volatile compared to GYG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check GYG.L's competition here
WATR.L vs TUNG.L Comparison July 2025
WATR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATR.L stands at 59.8M. In comparison, TUNG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WATR.L is priced at £314.00, while TUNG.L trades at £54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TUNG.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, WATR.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TUNG.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WATR.L is more volatile compared to TUNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATR.L.Check TUNG.L's competition here