WANdisco plc
WANdisco plc WAND.L Peers
See (WAND.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAND.L | £63.60 | +0.95% | 75.7M | -1.16 | -£0.55 | N/A |
| 0A7O.L | £376.26 | -1.27% | 95.5B | -7.06 | -£53.33 | +0.09% |
| 0A3O.L | £124.73 | +2.28% | 43.1B | 41575.33 | £0.00 | N/A |
| 0IL6.L | £286.90 | -1.71% | 16.5B | 50.56 | £5.68 | N/A |
| SGE.L | £1,268.50 | -1.13% | 12.3B | 36.24 | £0.35 | +1.50% |
| 0U3Q.L | £200.00 | +9.76% | 5.2B | 92.21 | £2.17 | +0.95% |
| 0QOA.L | £74.54 | -5.84% | 4.3B | 30.90 | £2.41 | +1.74% |
| 0OA4.L | £255.05 | -0.26% | 4.1B | 1424.89 | £0.18 | +0.11% |
| 0DWV.L | £193.00 | -2.72% | 3.8B | 122.85 | £1.57 | +0.33% |
| 0M2A.L | £13.20 | -0.23% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.53% |
Stock Comparison
WAND.L vs 0A7O.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0A7O.L has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0A7O.L trades at £376.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0A7O.L's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0A7O.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0A7O.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs 0A3O.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0A3O.L has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0A3O.L trades at £124.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0A3O.L's P/E ratio is 41575.33. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0A3O.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0A3O.L has daily volatility of 4.62.
WAND.L vs 0IL6.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0IL6.L has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0IL6.L trades at £286.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0IL6.L's P/E ratio is 50.56. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0IL6.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0IL6.L has daily volatility of 1.06.
WAND.L vs SGE.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SGE.L has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SGE.L trades at £1,268.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SGE.L's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SGE.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SGE.L has daily volatility of 1.30.
WAND.L vs 0U3Q.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0U3Q.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0U3Q.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0U3Q.L's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0U3Q.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0U3Q.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs 0QOA.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0QOA.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0QOA.L trades at £74.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0QOA.L's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0QOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0QOA.L has daily volatility of 3.38.
WAND.L vs 0OA4.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0OA4.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0OA4.L trades at £255.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0OA4.L's P/E ratio is 1424.89. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0OA4.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0OA4.L has daily volatility of 1.28.
WAND.L vs 0DWV.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0DWV.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0DWV.L trades at £193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0DWV.L's P/E ratio is 122.85. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0DWV.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0DWV.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs 0M2A.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0M2A.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0M2A.L trades at £13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0M2A.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0M2A.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs TRST.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, TRST.L has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while TRST.L trades at £228.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TRST.L's P/E ratio is 228.80. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TRST.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.36.
WAND.L vs 0RS2.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0RS2.L has a market cap of 927.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0RS2.L trades at £54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0RS2.L's P/E ratio is 40.40. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0RS2.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0RS2.L has daily volatility of 0.91.
WAND.L vs KNOS.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, KNOS.L has a market cap of 908.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while KNOS.L trades at £745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas KNOS.L's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to KNOS.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and KNOS.L has daily volatility of 2.27.
WAND.L vs 0GM9.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0GM9.L has a market cap of 880M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0GM9.L trades at £153.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0GM9.L's P/E ratio is -47.53. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0GM9.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0GM9.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs LTG.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, LTG.L has a market cap of 791.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while LTG.L trades at £99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LTG.L's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LTG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and LTG.L has daily volatility of 1.12.
WAND.L vs ALFA.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ALFA.L has a market cap of 685.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ALFA.L trades at £231.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ALFA.L's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ALFA.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ALFA.L has daily volatility of 1.50.
WAND.L vs GBG.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, GBG.L has a market cap of 595.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while GBG.L trades at £240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas GBG.L's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to GBG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and GBG.L has daily volatility of 2.95.
WAND.L vs ATG.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ATG.L has a market cap of 528.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ATG.L trades at £437.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ATG.L's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ATG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ATG.L has daily volatility of 4.05.
WAND.L vs NCC.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, NCC.L has a market cap of 512.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while NCC.L trades at £162.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas NCC.L's P/E ratio is -20.32. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NCC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and NCC.L has daily volatility of 3.16.
WAND.L vs DEV.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, DEV.L has a market cap of 508.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while DEV.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas DEV.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to DEV.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and DEV.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs CER.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, CER.L has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while CER.L trades at £1,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CER.L's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CER.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and CER.L has daily volatility of 1.02.
WAND.L vs 0L8Z.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0L8Z.L has a market cap of 380.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0L8Z.L trades at £4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0L8Z.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0L8Z.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0L8Z.L has daily volatility of 2.26.
WAND.L vs PBEE.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, PBEE.L has a market cap of 379.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while PBEE.L trades at £160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas PBEE.L's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PBEE.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and PBEE.L has daily volatility of 3.14.
WAND.L vs IQG.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, IQG.L has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while IQG.L trades at £478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas IQG.L's P/E ratio is -239.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IQG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and IQG.L has daily volatility of 0.84.
WAND.L vs IDOX.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, IDOX.L has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while IDOX.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas IDOX.L's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IDOX.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and IDOX.L has daily volatility of 3.23.
WAND.L vs BIG.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, BIG.L has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while BIG.L trades at £93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas BIG.L's P/E ratio is 93.20. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BIG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and BIG.L has daily volatility of 2.14.
WAND.L vs DOTD.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, DOTD.L has a market cap of 236.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while DOTD.L trades at £77.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas DOTD.L's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to DOTD.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and DOTD.L has daily volatility of 4.40.
WAND.L vs ACSO.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ACSO.L has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ACSO.L trades at £504.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ACSO.L's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ACSO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ACSO.L has daily volatility of 2.75.
WAND.L vs NET.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, NET.L has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while NET.L trades at £118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas NET.L's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NET.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and NET.L has daily volatility of 2.22.
WAND.L vs 0N6K.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0N6K.L has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0N6K.L trades at £3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0N6K.L's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0N6K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0N6K.L has daily volatility of 3.82.
WAND.L vs APTD.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, APTD.L has a market cap of 175.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while APTD.L trades at £316.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas APTD.L's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to APTD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and APTD.L has daily volatility of 1.92.
WAND.L vs 0AAW.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0AAW.L has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0AAW.L trades at £14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0AAW.L's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0AAW.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0AAW.L has daily volatility of 0.90.
WAND.L vs TRCS.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, TRCS.L has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while TRCS.L trades at £470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TRCS.L's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TRCS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and TRCS.L has daily volatility of 3.40.
WAND.L vs ELCO.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ELCO.L has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ELCO.L trades at £166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ELCO.L's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ELCO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ELCO.L has daily volatility of 3.02.
WAND.L vs GHT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, GHT.L has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while GHT.L trades at £161.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas GHT.L's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to GHT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and GHT.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs SAAS.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SAAS.L has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SAAS.L trades at £103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SAAS.L's P/E ratio is -51.75. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SAAS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SAAS.L has daily volatility of 2.90.
WAND.L vs SPSY.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SPSY.L has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SPSY.L trades at £231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SPSY.L's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SPSY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SPSY.L has daily volatility of 4.68.
WAND.L vs SPE.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SPE.L has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SPE.L trades at £990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SPE.L's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SPE.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SPE.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs SPSC.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SPSC.L has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SPSC.L trades at £250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SPSC.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SPSC.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SPSC.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs IGP.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, IGP.L has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while IGP.L trades at £169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas IGP.L's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IGP.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and IGP.L has daily volatility of 3.45.
WAND.L vs TRB.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, TRB.L has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while TRB.L trades at £43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TRB.L's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TRB.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and TRB.L has daily volatility of 4.10.
WAND.L vs RM.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, RM.L has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while RM.L trades at £107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas RM.L's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to RM.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and RM.L has daily volatility of 3.74.
WAND.L vs AOM.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, AOM.L has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while AOM.L trades at £119.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AOM.L's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and AOM.L has daily volatility of 4.71.
WAND.L vs 0QK1.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0QK1.L has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0QK1.L trades at £59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0QK1.L's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0QK1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0QK1.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs ACC.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ACC.L has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ACC.L trades at £61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ACC.L's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ACC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ACC.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs OMG.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, OMG.L has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while OMG.L trades at £57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas OMG.L's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to OMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and OMG.L has daily volatility of 3.41.
WAND.L vs D4T4.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, D4T4.L has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while D4T4.L trades at £177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas D4T4.L's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to D4T4.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and D4T4.L has daily volatility of 0.70.
WAND.L vs EYE.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, EYE.L has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while EYE.L trades at £206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas EYE.L's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to EYE.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and EYE.L has daily volatility of 3.88.
WAND.L vs CLBS.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, CLBS.L has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while CLBS.L trades at £152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CLBS.L's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CLBS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and CLBS.L has daily volatility of 2.09.
WAND.L vs PULS.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, PULS.L has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while PULS.L trades at £40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas PULS.L's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PULS.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and PULS.L has daily volatility of 0.68.
WAND.L vs SPA.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SPA.L has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SPA.L trades at £48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SPA.L's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SPA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SPA.L has daily volatility of 0.87.
WAND.L vs SKL.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SKL.L has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SKL.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SKL.L's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SKL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SKL.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs CRTA.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, CRTA.L has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while CRTA.L trades at £26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CRTA.L's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CRTA.L's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and CRTA.L has daily volatility of 6.40.
WAND.L vs SMRT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SMRT.L has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SMRT.L trades at £88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SMRT.L's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SMRT.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SMRT.L has daily volatility of 0.23.
WAND.L vs GETB.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, GETB.L has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while GETB.L trades at £50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas GETB.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to GETB.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and GETB.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs CHSS.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, CHSS.L has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while CHSS.L trades at £3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CHSS.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CHSS.L's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and CHSS.L has daily volatility of 6.34.
WAND.L vs ESYS.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ESYS.L has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ESYS.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ESYS.L's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ESYS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ESYS.L has daily volatility of 9.23.
WAND.L vs BIRD.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, BIRD.L has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while BIRD.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas BIRD.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BIRD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and BIRD.L has daily volatility of 8.27.
WAND.L vs TEK.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, TEK.L has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while TEK.L trades at £7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TEK.L's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TEK.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and TEK.L has daily volatility of 1.93.
WAND.L vs ALT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ALT.L has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ALT.L trades at £24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ALT.L's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ALT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ALT.L has daily volatility of 10.75.
WAND.L vs CKT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, CKT.L has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while CKT.L trades at £15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CKT.L's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CKT.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and CKT.L has daily volatility of 6.45.
WAND.L vs ITIM.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ITIM.L has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ITIM.L trades at £48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ITIM.L's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ITIM.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ITIM.L has daily volatility of 6.97.
WAND.L vs 0A8G.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0A8G.L has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0A8G.L trades at £6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0A8G.L's P/E ratio is -50.49. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0A8G.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0A8G.L has daily volatility of 0.69.
WAND.L vs CRDL.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, CRDL.L has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while CRDL.L trades at £6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CRDL.L's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CRDL.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and CRDL.L has daily volatility of 2.76.
WAND.L vs ZOO.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ZOO.L has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ZOO.L trades at £15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ZOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZOO.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ZOO.L has daily volatility of 14.18.
WAND.L vs PEN.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, PEN.L has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while PEN.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas PEN.L's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PEN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and PEN.L has daily volatility of 5.59.
WAND.L vs ARC.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ARC.L has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ARC.L trades at £85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ARC.L's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ARC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ARC.L has daily volatility of 0.92.
WAND.L vs S247.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, S247.L has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while S247.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas S247.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to S247.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and S247.L has daily volatility of 5.48.
WAND.L vs ING.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ING.L has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ING.L trades at £63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ING.L's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ING.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ING.L has daily volatility of 2.33.
WAND.L vs TERN.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, TERN.L has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while TERN.L trades at £1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TERN.L's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TERN.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and TERN.L has daily volatility of 9.06.
WAND.L vs EXR.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, EXR.L has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while EXR.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas EXR.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to EXR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and EXR.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs MBT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, MBT.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while MBT.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas MBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MBT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and MBT.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs TIDE.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, TIDE.L has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while TIDE.L trades at £63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TIDE.L's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TIDE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and TIDE.L has daily volatility of 5.44.
WAND.L vs 0O8X.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 0O8X.L has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 0O8X.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 0O8X.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 0O8X.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0O8X.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs RDT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, RDT.L has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while RDT.L trades at £3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas RDT.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to RDT.L's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and RDT.L has daily volatility of 10.24.
WAND.L vs RTOP.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, RTOP.L has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while RTOP.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas RTOP.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to RTOP.L's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and RTOP.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs AIQ.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, AIQ.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while AIQ.L trades at £4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AIQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AIQ.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and AIQ.L has daily volatility of 28.57.
WAND.L vs 4GBL.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, 4GBL.L has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while 4GBL.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas 4GBL.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to 4GBL.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and 4GBL.L has daily volatility of 5.71.
WAND.L vs OBC.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, OBC.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while OBC.L trades at £15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas OBC.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to OBC.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and OBC.L has daily volatility of N/A.
WAND.L vs SYME.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SYME.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SYME.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SYME.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SYME.L's ROE of +6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SYME.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs ACRM.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ACRM.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ACRM.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ACRM.L's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ACRM.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ACRM.L has daily volatility of 7.30.
WAND.L vs DSG.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, DSG.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while DSG.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas DSG.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to DSG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and DSG.L has daily volatility of 9.06.
WAND.L vs SORT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SORT.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SORT.L trades at £23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SORT.L's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SORT.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SORT.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs MBO.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, MBO.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while MBO.L trades at £1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas MBO.L's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MBO.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and MBO.L has daily volatility of 6.45.
WAND.L vs LOOP.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, LOOP.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while LOOP.L trades at £0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LOOP.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LOOP.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and LOOP.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs ENET.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ENET.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ENET.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ENET.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ENET.L's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ENET.L has daily volatility of 9.09.
WAND.L vs PTRO.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, PTRO.L has a market cap of 954.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while PTRO.L trades at £1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas PTRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PTRO.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and PTRO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
WAND.L vs INX.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, INX.L has a market cap of 665.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while INX.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas INX.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to INX.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and INX.L has daily volatility of 27.27.
WAND.L vs LSAI.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, LSAI.L has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while LSAI.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LSAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LSAI.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and LSAI.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
WAND.L vs IDEA.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, IDEA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while IDEA.L trades at £349.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas IDEA.L's P/E ratio is 174.50. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IDEA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and IDEA.L has daily volatility of 0.35.
WAND.L vs VRE.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, VRE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while VRE.L trades at £18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas VRE.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VRE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and VRE.L has daily volatility of 13.08.
WAND.L vs AVV.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, AVV.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while AVV.L trades at £3,219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AVV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AVV.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and AVV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
WAND.L vs ATQT.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, ATQT.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while ATQT.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ATQT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ATQT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and ATQT.L has daily volatility of N/A.
WAND.L vs MNO.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, MNO.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while MNO.L trades at £12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas MNO.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MNO.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and MNO.L has daily volatility of 5.62.
WAND.L vs SIM.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, SIM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while SIM.L trades at £13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SIM.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SIM.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and SIM.L has daily volatility of 180.78.
WAND.L vs DMTR.L Comparison
WAND.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WAND.L stands at 75.7M. In comparison, DMTR.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WAND.L is priced at £63.60, while DMTR.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WAND.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas DMTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WAND.L's ROE is -1.08%, compared to DMTR.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A and DMTR.L has daily volatility of N/A.