Veolia Environnement S.A.

VVD.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VVD.DE stands at 22.2B. In comparison, UWS.DE has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VVD.DE is priced at €30.47, while UWS.DE trades at €193.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VVD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.79, whereas UWS.DE's P/E ratio is 33.99. In terms of profitability, VVD.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UWS.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VVD.DE is more volatile compared to UWS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VVD.DE.

VVD.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VVD.DE stands at 22.2B. In comparison, BFSA.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VVD.DE is priced at €30.47, while BFSA.DE trades at €28.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VVD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.79, whereas BFSA.DE's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, VVD.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BFSA.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VVD.DE is less volatile compared to BFSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VVD.DE.

VVD.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VVD.DE stands at 22.2B. In comparison, ABA.F has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VVD.DE is priced at €30.47, while ABA.F trades at €7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VVD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.79, whereas ABA.F's P/E ratio is 258.33. In terms of profitability, VVD.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABA.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VVD.DE is more volatile compared to ABA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VVD.DE.

VVD.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VVD.DE stands at 22.2B. In comparison, ZEF.DE has a market cap of 756K. Regarding current trading prices, VVD.DE is priced at €30.47, while ZEF.DE trades at €0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VVD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.79, whereas ZEF.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, VVD.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZEF.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VVD.DE is less volatile compared to ZEF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VVD.DE.

VVD.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VVD.DE stands at 22.2B. In comparison, 1EZ0.F has a market cap of 713. Regarding current trading prices, VVD.DE is priced at €30.47, while 1EZ0.F trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VVD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.79, whereas 1EZ0.F's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VVD.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1EZ0.F's ROE of -7.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VVD.DE is less volatile compared to 1EZ0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VVD.DE.