Vantage Towers AG
Vantage Towers AG VTWR.DE Peers
See (VTWR.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWR.DE | €32.50 | N/A | 16.4B | 43.33 | €0.75 | N/A |
| VNA.DE | €29.15 | -0.27% | 24B | -32.39 | -€0.90 | +4.19% |
| VNA.F | €29.12 | -0.48% | 24B | -32.36 | -€0.90 | +4.19% |
| VTWR.F | €32.40 | N/A | 16.4B | 43.20 | €0.75 | N/A |
| G24.DE | €120.90 | +0.42% | 8.8B | 54.46 | €2.22 | +0.99% |
| G24.SG | €120.70 | +0.25% | 8.8B | N/A | N/A | +0.99% |
| O5G.DE | €0.85 | N/A | 7.4B | -28.33 | -€0.03 | N/A |
| EFE.F | €19.33 | +1.05% | 6.8B | 14.87 | €1.30 | +1.65% |
| LEG.DE | €74.00 | -0.20% | 5.5B | 32.03 | €2.31 | +3.65% |
| LEG.SG | €73.65 | -0.61% | 5.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.66% |
Stock Comparison
VTWR.DE vs VNA.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VNA.DE has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while VNA.DE trades at €29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas VNA.DE's P/E ratio is -32.39. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNA.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to VNA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs VNA.F Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VNA.F has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while VNA.F trades at €29.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas VNA.F's P/E ratio is -32.36. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNA.F's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to VNA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs VTWR.F Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VTWR.F has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while VTWR.F trades at €32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas VTWR.F's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTWR.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to VTWR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs G24.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, G24.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while G24.DE trades at €120.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas G24.DE's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to G24.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to G24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs G24.SG Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, G24.SG has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while G24.SG trades at €120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas G24.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to G24.SG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to G24.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs O5G.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, O5G.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while O5G.DE trades at €0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas O5G.DE's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to O5G.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to O5G.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs EFE.F Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, EFE.F has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while EFE.F trades at €19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas EFE.F's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFE.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to EFE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs LEG.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, LEG.DE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while LEG.DE trades at €74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas LEG.DE's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEG.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to LEG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs LEG.SG Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, LEG.SG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while LEG.SG trades at €73.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas LEG.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEG.SG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to LEG.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs AT1.F Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, AT1.F has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while AT1.F trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas AT1.F's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AT1.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to AT1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs AT1.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, AT1.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while AT1.DE trades at €2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas AT1.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AT1.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to AT1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs TEG.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TEG.DE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while TEG.DE trades at €14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas TEG.DE's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEG.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to TEG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs GYC.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, GYC.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while GYC.DE trades at €11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas GYC.DE's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GYC.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to GYC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs 6CL.F Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, 6CL.F has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while 6CL.F trades at €9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas 6CL.F's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6CL.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to 6CL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs T1L.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, T1L.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while T1L.DE trades at €22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas T1L.DE's P/E ratio is -65.59. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to T1L.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VTWR.DE has daily volatility of 1.55 and T1L.DE has daily volatility of N/A.
VTWR.DE vs DEQ.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DEQ.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while DEQ.DE trades at €19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas DEQ.DE's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEQ.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to DEQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs 6N5.F Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, 6N5.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while 6N5.F trades at €16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas 6N5.F's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6N5.F's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to 6N5.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs ADL.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ADL.DE has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while ADL.DE trades at €8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas ADL.DE's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADL.DE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to ADL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs PAT.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PAT.DE has a market cap of 673.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while PAT.DE trades at €7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas PAT.DE's P/E ratio is 43.39. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAT.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to PAT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs VIH1.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VIH1.DE has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while VIH1.DE trades at €7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas VIH1.DE's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIH1.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to VIH1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs DEF.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DEF.DE has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while DEF.DE trades at €28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas DEF.DE's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEF.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to DEF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs FC9.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FC9.DE has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while FC9.DE trades at €12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas FC9.DE's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FC9.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to FC9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs DMRE.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DMRE.DE has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while DMRE.DE trades at €0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas DMRE.DE's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMRE.DE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to DMRE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs CCAP.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CCAP.DE has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while CCAP.DE trades at €0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas CCAP.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCAP.DE's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to CCAP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs ADJ.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ADJ.DE has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while ADJ.DE trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas ADJ.DE's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADJ.DE's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to ADJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs IC8.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, IC8.DE has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while IC8.DE trades at €0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas IC8.DE's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IC8.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to IC8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs WFS.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, WFS.DE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while WFS.DE trades at €0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas WFS.DE's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFS.DE's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to WFS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs PBY.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PBY.DE has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while PBY.DE trades at €2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas PBY.DE's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBY.DE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to PBY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs DGR.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DGR.DE has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while DGR.DE trades at €7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas DGR.DE's P/E ratio is -29.04. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGR.DE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to DGR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs UIJ.MU Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, UIJ.MU has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while UIJ.MU trades at €4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas UIJ.MU's P/E ratio is 454.00. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UIJ.MU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to UIJ.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs A4Y.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, A4Y.DE has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while A4Y.DE trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas A4Y.DE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to A4Y.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to A4Y.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs AMMN.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, AMMN.DE has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while AMMN.DE trades at €0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas AMMN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMMN.DE's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to AMMN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs TTO.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TTO.DE has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while TTO.DE trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas TTO.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTO.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to TTO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs M8H.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, M8H.DE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while M8H.DE trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas M8H.DE's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to M8H.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to M8H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs PAG.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PAG.DE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while PAG.DE trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas PAG.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAG.DE's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to PAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs CORE.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CORE.DE has a market cap of 672.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while CORE.DE trades at €0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas CORE.DE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CORE.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to CORE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs VROS.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VROS.DE has a market cap of 563.8K. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while VROS.DE trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas VROS.DE's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VROS.DE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to VROS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs PAG.F Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PAG.F has a market cap of 397.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while PAG.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas PAG.F's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAG.F's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to PAG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs TLG.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while TLG.DE trades at €30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas TLG.DE's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TLG.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is more volatile compared to TLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.
VTWR.DE vs HHH.DE Comparison
VTWR.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTWR.DE stands at 16.4B. In comparison, HHH.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VTWR.DE is priced at €32.50, while HHH.DE trades at €0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTWR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 43.33, whereas HHH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTWR.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HHH.DE's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VTWR.DE is less volatile compared to HHH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTWR.DE.