Verus International, Inc.
Verus International, Inc. VRUS Peers
See (VRUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRUS | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 202.5K | N/A | -$0.04 | N/A |
| BZLFF | $42.25 | N/A | 13.8B | 21.02 | $2.01 | +1.72% |
| JRONF | $18.52 | -13.86% | 11.7B | 16.25 | $1.14 | +3.14% |
| BZLFY | $16.00 | -0.99% | 10.4B | 15.84 | $1.01 | +5.15% |
| BPPPF | $25.41 | -2.27% | 8.6B | 19.25 | $1.32 | +1.37% |
| BDDDY | $24.57 | +1.48% | 8.2B | 18.47 | $1.33 | N/A |
| JRONY | $50.22 | -1.57% | 7.9B | 21.93 | $2.29 | +2.93% |
| ATAAY | $7.71 | +25.90% | 4.1B | 11.85 | $0.65 | +0.13% |
| OLGPF | $0.73 | +2.96% | 2.8B | 73.00 | $0.01 | +5.61% |
| MSHXF | $42.81 | -0.09% | 1.9B | 11.57 | $3.70 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
VRUS vs BZLFF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, BZLFF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while BZLFF trades at $42.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZLFF's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BZLFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to BZLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs JRONF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, JRONF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while JRONF trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRONF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRONF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to JRONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs BZLFY Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, BZLFY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while BZLFY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZLFY's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BZLFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to BZLFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs BPPPF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, BPPPF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while BPPPF trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPPPF's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to BPPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs BDDDY Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, BDDDY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while BDDDY trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDDDY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDDDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to BDDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs JRONY Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, JRONY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while JRONY trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRONY's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRONY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to JRONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs ATAAY Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, ATAAY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while ATAAY trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAAY's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATAAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to ATAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs OLGPF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, OLGPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while OLGPF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLGPF's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OLGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to OLGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs MSHXF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, MSHXF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while MSHXF trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSHXF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSHXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to MSHXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs MCSHF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, MCSHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while MCSHF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCSHF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCSHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to MCSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs KARNF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, KARNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while KARNF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KARNF's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KARNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to KARNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs SGPPF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, SGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while SGPPF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGPPF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to SGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs SGPPY Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, SGPPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while SGPPY trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGPPY's P/E ratio is 57.80. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGPPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to SGPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs ACNFF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, ACNFF has a market cap of 649.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while ACNFF trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACNFF's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to ACNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs DMPLF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, DMPLF has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while DMPLF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMPLF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to DMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs OISXF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, OISXF has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while OISXF trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OISXF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OISXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to OISXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs GLBGF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, GLBGF has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while GLBGF trades at $143.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBGF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLBGF's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to GLBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs IVFH Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, IVFH has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while IVFH trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVFH's P/E ratio is 138.50. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVFH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to IVFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs COLFF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, COLFF has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while COLFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COLFF's P/E ratio is 58.73. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COLFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to COLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs EWOOF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, EWOOF has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while EWOOF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWOOF's P/E ratio is -69.37. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWOOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to EWOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs AIXND Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, AIXND has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while AIXND trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIXND's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIXND's ROE of -9.90%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to AIXND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs OGOFF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, OGOFF has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while OGOFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGOFF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OGOFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to OGOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs AIXN Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, AIXN has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while AIXN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIXN's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIXN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to AIXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs CEUMF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, CEUMF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while CEUMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUMF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to CEUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs NCTW Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, NCTW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while NCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCTW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to NCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs NHYF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, NHYF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while NHYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHYF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to NHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs MCLE Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, MCLE has a market cap of 899.8K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while MCLE trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCLE's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCLE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to MCLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs WDRP Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, WDRP has a market cap of 514.9K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while WDRP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDRP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to WDRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs DLAD Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, DLAD has a market cap of 394.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while DLAD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLAD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to DLAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs ENHD Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, ENHD has a market cap of 190.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while ENHD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENHD's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENHD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to ENHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs GPDB Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, GPDB has a market cap of 72.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while GPDB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to GPDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs ACITF Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, ACITF has a market cap of 37.3K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while ACITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACITF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACITF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to ACITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs UNMK Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, UNMK has a market cap of 17.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while UNMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNMK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to UNMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs JAMN Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, JAMN has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while JAMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to JAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs NXTH Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, NXTH has a market cap of 7.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while NXTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXTH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to NXTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs GLCC Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, GLCC has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while GLCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to GLCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs SYBRQ Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, SYBRQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while SYBRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBRQ's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYBRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS and SYBRQ have similar daily volatility (196.04).
VRUS vs PACV Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, PACV has a market cap of 363. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while PACV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PACV's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to PACV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs LFER Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, LFER has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while LFER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFER's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFER's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to LFER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.
VRUS vs NRYYY Comparison
VRUS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRUS stands at 202.5K. In comparison, NRYYY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRUS is priced at $0.00, while NRYYY trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRUS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRYYY's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, VRUS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRYYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRUS is more volatile compared to NRYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRUS.