VPN Technologies Inc.
VPN Technologies Inc. VPN.CN Peers
See (VPN.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPN.CN | CA$0.19 | +8.11% | 6.5M | -18.50 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | CA$33.46 | +0.39% | 4.9T | 34.49 | CA$0.97 | +0.97% |
| PANW.NE | CA$23.84 | +1.19% | 182.2B | 113.52 | CA$0.21 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | CA$47.61 | N/A | 6.8B | 216.41 | CA$0.22 | +0.80% |
| BB.TO | CA$5.44 | -1.90% | 3.2B | -543.50 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| TIXT.TO | CA$4.12 | +2.49% | 1.1B | -6.15 | -CA$0.67 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | CA$11.99 | +0.08% | 943.5M | -49.96 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| DND.TO | CA$10.54 | -0.57% | 708.3M | -4.32 | -CA$2.44 | +0.71% |
| CVO.TO | CA$7.20 | -0.14% | 692.5M | -37.89 | -CA$0.19 | N/A |
| TC.TO | CA$26.55 | -2.50% | 293.6M | -2.15 | -CA$12.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VPN.CN vs MSFT.NE Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs PANW.NE Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while PANW.NE trades at CA$23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 113.52. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs NVEI.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs BB.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while BB.TO trades at CA$5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is -543.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BB.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs TIXT.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs CPLF.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs DND.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 708.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while DND.TO trades at CA$10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs CVO.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 692.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while CVO.TO trades at CA$7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -37.89. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs TC.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 293.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while TC.TO trades at CA$26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs STC.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 261M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while STC.TO trades at CA$7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -26.86. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs PAY.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while PAY.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs GIVX.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs HAI.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while HAI.TO trades at CA$4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs RAIL.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs NC.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs MOGO.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs SCPE.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs PACT.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs HANK.V Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while HANK.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs ICS.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while ICS.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs CYBT.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs NFTX.NE Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +52.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs IP.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs EONX.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while EONX.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs PKK.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs PERK.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs OPT.TO Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs MBLM.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs SCYB.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs BVCI.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs DSAI.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs HRO.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs APP.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs BYND.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs AMPD.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs SQID.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, VPN.CN is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPN.CN.
VPN.CN vs EAP.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VPN.CN has daily volatility of 23.53 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
VPN.CN vs TAAL.CN Comparison
VPN.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPN.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VPN.CN is priced at CA$0.19, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -18.50, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VPN.CN's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VPN.CN has daily volatility of 23.53 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.