Voip-Pal.com Inc.
Voip-Pal.com Inc. VPLM Peers
See (VPLM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPLM | $0.01 | -8.11% | 24.9M | -0.68 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AXTLF | $0.10 | N/A | 34.9T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $37.99 | -2.39% | 186.2B | 13.67 | $2.78 | +2.94% |
| DTEGY | $37.78 | -2.78% | 185.1B | 13.54 | $2.79 | +2.89% |
| NPPXF | $1.11 | -0.06% | 91.8B | 13.88 | $0.08 | +3.21% |
| CUCSY | $13.06 | +8.29% | 88.9B | 7.42 | $1.76 | +5.79% |
| NTTYY | $26.86 | +1.02% | 88.9B | 12.91 | $2.08 | +1.22% |
| SFTBY | $27.20 | -1.20% | 77.8B | 10.04 | $2.71 | +0.18% |
| SFTBF | $53.07 | +1.09% | 76.3B | 9.72 | $5.46 | +0.56% |
| SFBQF | $1.56 | -1.58% | 74B | 19.44 | $0.08 | +3.79% |
Stock Comparison
VPLM vs AXTLF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 34.9T. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs DTEGF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 186.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while DTEGF trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs DTEGY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while DTEGY trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs NPPXF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while NPPXF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs CUCSY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs NTTYY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while NTTYY trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SFTBY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SFTBY trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SFTBF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SFTBF trades at $53.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SFBQF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SFBQF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AMXVF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs KDDIY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while KDDIY trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AMOVF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs KDDIF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while KDDIF trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AARTY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs CLLNY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while CLLNY trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -468.56. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SGAPY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SGAPY trades at $29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SNGNF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SNGNF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs FNCTF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while FNCTF trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SWZCF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SWZCF trades at $690.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SCMWY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SCMWY trades at $68.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TLGPY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TLGPY trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TTRAF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TTRAF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TEFOF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TEFOF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -52.70. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AVIFY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AVIFY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AVIKF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs CTOWY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs CHWRF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while CHWRF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs VODPF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while VODPF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BTGOF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BTGOF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TELNF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TELNF trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TELNY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TELNY trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs KKPNF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while KKPNF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs KKPNY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while KKPNY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs ELMUY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while ELMUY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TLKMF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TLKMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AVIVF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs HLTOY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while HLTOY trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TLSNY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TLSNY trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SJRWF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs VDMCY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while VDMCY trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs RCIAF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while RCIAF trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs LBRDB Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while LBRDB trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TLSNF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TLSNF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs MTNOY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while MTNOY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -23.47. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TCPFF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TCPFF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs MTNOF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while MTNOF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BCPPF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TELDY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BCEPF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BCEPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs VODAF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs HKTTY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while HKTTY trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BECEF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TLTZY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TLTZY trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TIAIY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TIAIY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -25.42. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TLTZF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TLTZF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BCEXF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs FRTAY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while FRTAY trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs DIGBF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TIAOF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TIAOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TIAJF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs ELMUF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SHNUF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs HKTTF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while HKTTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SOBKY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SOBKY trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TELDF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TELDF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs MYTEF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs HLTOF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs QBCRF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while QBCRF trades at $27.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs QBCAF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs MAXSF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TRKNY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TRKNY trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs PCCWY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while PCCWY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TKAGY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs PHTCF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AAFRF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs PCWLF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while PCWLF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -61.61. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TCMFF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TCMFF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs FRTAF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while FRTAF trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BZQIF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BZQIF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs GTMEY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs UDIRF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while UDIRF trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -70.14. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs AXXTF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while AXXTF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BZQIY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BZQIY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs CUCSF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while CUCSF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TFAOF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs IIJIF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs IIJIY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while IIJIY trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs MICCF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs PTITF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TACYY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TRKNF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BGAOY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BGAOY trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs BGAOF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while BGAOF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs TLGHY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs PTTWF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs GMOYF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs SPKKY Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while SPKKY trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs NZTCF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while NZTCF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.
VPLM vs CLCMF Comparison
VPLM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VPLM stands at 24.9M. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VPLM is priced at $0.01, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VPLM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.68, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, VPLM's ROE is -3.71%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VPLM is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VPLM.