InnovaQor, Inc.
InnovaQor, Inc. VMCS Peers
See (VMCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMCS | $0.01 | +16.80% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PMCUF | $169.99 | -3.41% | 17.8B | 274.18 | $0.62 | +0.11% |
| MTHRY | $6.83 | -1.30% | 9.3B | 34.15 | $0.20 | N/A |
| MTHRF | $13.65 | N/A | 9.3B | 33.29 | $0.41 | +0.01% |
| PANHF | $0.88 | N/A | 1.9B | 88.20 | $0.01 | +141.33% |
| PIAHY | $2.29 | N/A | 1.2B | 114.50 | $0.02 | +217.08% |
| CMPVF | $23.85 | N/A | 1.2B | 41.13 | $0.58 | +5.53% |
| CMPUY | $23.00 | -7.26% | 1.2B | 38.98 | $0.59 | N/A |
| RSLBF | $32.63 | -2.92% | 1.1B | 47.99 | $0.68 | +0.96% |
| CRWRF | $26.96 | N/A | 944.1M | 62.70 | $0.43 | +1.40% |
Stock Comparison
VMCS vs PMCUF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, PMCUF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while PMCUF trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMCUF's P/E ratio is 274.18. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to PMCUF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to PMCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MTHRY Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MTHRY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MTHRY trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTHRY's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MTHRY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to MTHRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MTHRF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MTHRF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MTHRF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTHRF's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MTHRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to MTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs PANHF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, PANHF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while PANHF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANHF's P/E ratio is 88.20. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to PANHF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to PANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs PIAHY Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, PIAHY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while PIAHY trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIAHY's P/E ratio is 114.50. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to PIAHY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to PIAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CMPVF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CMPVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CMPVF trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPVF's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CMPVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CMPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CMPUY Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CMPUY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CMPUY trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPUY's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CMPUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs RSLBF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, RSLBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while RSLBF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSLBF's P/E ratio is 47.99. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to RSLBF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to RSLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CRWRF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CRWRF has a market cap of 944.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CRWRF trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWRF's P/E ratio is 62.70. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CRWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CRWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs SUSRF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, SUSRF has a market cap of 770.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while SUSRF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUSRF's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to SUSRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to SUSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs SMSZF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, SMSZF has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while SMSZF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMSZF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to SMSZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to SMSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs KSIOF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, KSIOF has a market cap of 460.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while KSIOF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSIOF's P/E ratio is -244.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to KSIOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to KSIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs VHIBF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, VHIBF has a market cap of 443.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while VHIBF trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHIBF's P/E ratio is 274.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to VHIBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to VHIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs SMDCF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, SMDCF has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while SMDCF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDCF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to SMDCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to SMDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs DLHTF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, DLHTF has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while DLHTF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLHTF's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to DLHTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to DLHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs VPAHF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, VPAHF has a market cap of 188.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while VPAHF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPAHF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to VPAHF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to VPAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs COGZF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, COGZF has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while COGZF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COGZF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to COGZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to COGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ACMLF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ACMLF has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ACMLF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMLF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ACMLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to ACMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ONVVF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ONVVF has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ONVVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONVVF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ONVVF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to ONVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CSAMF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CSAMF has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CSAMF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSAMF's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CSAMF's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CSAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MDPEF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MDPEF has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MDPEF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDPEF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MDPEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to MDPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs HITC Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, HITC has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while HITC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HITC's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to HITC's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to HITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MDBIF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MDBIF has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MDBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBIF's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MDBIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to MDBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs RQHTF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, RQHTF has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while RQHTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQHTF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to RQHTF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to RQHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs RTNXF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, RTNXF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while RTNXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTNXF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to RTNXF's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to RTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs VASO Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, VASO has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while VASO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VASO's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to VASO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to VASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs HDSLF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, HDSLF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while HDSLF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDSLF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to HDSLF's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to HDSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs THKKF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, THKKF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while THKKF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THKKF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to THKKF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to THKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs TREIF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, TREIF has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while TREIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREIF's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to TREIF's ROE of -11.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to TREIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs DGNOF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, DGNOF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while DGNOF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGNOF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to DGNOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to DGNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MNNDF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MNNDF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MNNDF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNNDF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MNNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to MNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs UDOCF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, UDOCF has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while UDOCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDOCF's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to UDOCF's ROE of +6.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to UDOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs AIMLF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, AIMLF has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while AIMLF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMLF's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to AIMLF's ROE of -11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to AIMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs PBSV Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, PBSV has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while PBSV trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBSV's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to PBSV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to PBSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs EMOR Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, EMOR has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while EMOR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to EMOR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to EMOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CDXFF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CDXFF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CDXFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDXFF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CDXFF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CDXFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs HSCHF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, HSCHF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while HSCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to HSCHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to HSCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs VYND Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, VYND has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while VYND trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYND's P/E ratio is -49.99. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to VYND's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to VYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CRVW Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CRVW has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CRVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRVW's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CRVW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CRVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs HBCNF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, HBCNF has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while HBCNF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBCNF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to HBCNF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to HBCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs SPLTF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, SPLTF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while SPLTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLTF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to SPLTF's ROE of -6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to SPLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CRBKF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CRBKF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CRBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBKF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CRBKF's ROE of +68.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CRBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs DOCRF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, DOCRF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while DOCRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCRF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to DOCRF's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to DOCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CNONF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CNONF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CNONF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNONF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CNONF's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to CNONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs RYAHF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, RYAHF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while RYAHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYAHF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to RYAHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to RYAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CMPD Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CMPD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CMPD trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPD's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CMPD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CMPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs IQAIF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, IQAIF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while IQAIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQAIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to IQAIF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to IQAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CBDS Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CBDS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CBDS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBDS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CBDS's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CBDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MITI Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MITI has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MITI trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITI's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MITI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to MITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs LVCE Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, LVCE has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while LVCE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to LVCE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to LVCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CMHSF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CMHSF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CMHSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMHSF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CMHSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to CMHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs EBYH Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, EBYH has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while EBYH trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBYH's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to EBYH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to EBYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs EKGGF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, EKGGF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while EKGGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKGGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to EKGGF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to EKGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs BNVIF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, BNVIF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while BNVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to BNVIF's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to BNVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CSOC Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CSOC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CSOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSOC's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CSOC's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to CSOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs PPJE Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, PPJE has a market cap of 920.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while PPJE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to PPJE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to PPJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MDXL Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MDXL has a market cap of 801K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MDXL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDXL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MDXL's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to MDXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MDRM Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MDRM has a market cap of 765.3K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MDRM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDRM's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MDRM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to MDRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs NEWUF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, NEWUF has a market cap of 633.3K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while NEWUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWUF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to NEWUF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to NEWUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs EVAHF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, EVAHF has a market cap of 593.3K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while EVAHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVAHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to EVAHF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to EVAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs DTRK Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, DTRK has a market cap of 562.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while DTRK trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTRK's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to DTRK's ROE of -9.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to DTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ACHKF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ACHKF has a market cap of 522.6K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ACHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACHKF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ACHKF's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to ACHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MDNWF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MDNWF has a market cap of 517.3K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MDNWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDNWF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MDNWF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to MDNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs TSTTF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, TSTTF has a market cap of 461.6K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while TSTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSTTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to TSTTF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to TSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs NDATF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, NDATF has a market cap of 450.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while NDATF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDATF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to NDATF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to NDATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs LFCOF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, LFCOF has a market cap of 282K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while LFCOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFCOF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to LFCOF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to LFCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CTVEF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CTVEF has a market cap of 268.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CTVEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVEF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CTVEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to CTVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs EWLL Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, EWLL has a market cap of 185.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while EWLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to EWLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to EWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ALDNF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ALDNF has a market cap of 160.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ALDNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALDNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ALDNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to ALDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs USPS Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, USPS has a market cap of 158.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while USPS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USPS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to USPS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to USPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs EMYSF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, EMYSF has a market cap of 151.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while EMYSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMYSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to EMYSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to EMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs NMXS Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, NMXS has a market cap of 116.8K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while NMXS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMXS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to NMXS's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to NMXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs DSOL Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, DSOL has a market cap of 88.9K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while DSOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to DSOL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to DSOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs PASO Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, PASO has a market cap of 74.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while PASO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PASO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to PASO's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to PASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ICCO Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ICCO has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ICCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICCO's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ICCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to ICCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs REFG Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, REFG has a market cap of 60.8K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while REFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REFG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to REFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to REFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs SOFE Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, SOFE has a market cap of 45.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while SOFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to SOFE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to SOFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs HDVY Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, HDVY has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while HDVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to HDVY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to HDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs IGRW Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, IGRW has a market cap of 39.8K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while IGRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to IGRW's ROE of +7.88%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to IGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs WMGR Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, WMGR has a market cap of 36.3K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while WMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to WMGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to WMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs SSYNF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, SSYNF has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while SSYNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSYNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to SSYNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to SSYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs RVRC Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, RVRC has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while RVRC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVRC's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to RVRC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to RVRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs TTBLF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, TTBLF has a market cap of 26.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while TTBLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTBLF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to TTBLF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to TTBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ORHB Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ORHB has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ORHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORHB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ORHB's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to ORHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs NHEL Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, NHEL has a market cap of 16.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while NHEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to NHEL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to NHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs FDBH Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, FDBH has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while FDBH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDBH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to FDBH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to FDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs HLTT Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, HLTT has a market cap of 10.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while HLTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to HLTT's ROE of +1789941.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to HLTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs CGNSF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, CGNSF has a market cap of 9K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while CGNSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGNSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to CGNSF's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to CGNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs MOSTQ Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, MOSTQ has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while MOSTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to MOSTQ's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to MOSTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ACNV Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ACNV has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ACNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ACNV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to ACNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs AHGIF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, AHGIF has a market cap of 7.8K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while AHGIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHGIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to AHGIF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to AHGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs NHIQ Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, NHIQ has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while NHIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to NHIQ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to NHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs BBLNF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, BBLNF has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while BBLNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBLNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to BBLNF's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to BBLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs PCYS Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, PCYS has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while PCYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to PCYS's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to PCYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs OLMM Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, OLMM has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while OLMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to OLMM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to OLMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs ETAOF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, ETAOF has a market cap of 512. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while ETAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to ETAOF's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to ETAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs LGBI Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, LGBI has a market cap of 50. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while LGBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to LGBI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is less volatile compared to LGBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs APYI Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, APYI has a market cap of 34. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while APYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to APYI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to APYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.
VMCS vs WTEQF Comparison
VMCS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VMCS stands at 0. In comparison, WTEQF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VMCS is priced at $0.01, while WTEQF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VMCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTEQF's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, VMCS's ROE is +3.10%, compared to WTEQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VMCS is more volatile compared to WTEQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VMCS.