Viabuilt Ventures Inc.
Viabuilt Ventures Inc. VBVT Peers
See (VBVT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VBVT | $0.00 | +0.00% | 247 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HTHIF | $26.78 | +2.96% | 122.6B | 28.80 | $0.93 | +1.10% |
| MSBHF | $20.40 | -0.24% | 81.1B | 12.44 | $1.64 | +3.33% |
| MTSUY | $20.39 | +0.05% | 81.1B | 12.43 | $1.64 | +2.68% |
| ITOCF | $52.98 | N/A | 75.1B | 12.38 | $4.28 | +2.56% |
| ITOCY | $104.52 | -0.01% | 74.1B | 12.21 | $8.56 | N/A |
| HTHIY | $26.43 | +0.30% | 60.5B | 28.42 | $0.93 | +2.22% |
| MITSF | $20.69 | +0.93% | 59.5B | 9.71 | $2.13 | +3.28% |
| MITSY | $410.42 | -0.02% | 59B | 9.63 | $42.64 | +1.29% |
| CTPCF | $1.22 | N/A | 35.5B | 4.52 | $0.27 | +0.77% |
Stock Comparison
VBVT vs HTHIF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while HTHIF trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MSBHF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MSBHF trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MTSUY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MTSUY trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs ITOCF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while ITOCF trades at $52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs ITOCY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while ITOCY trades at $104.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs HTHIY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while HTHIY trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MITSF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MITSF trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MITSY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MITSY trades at $410.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs CTPCF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CTPCF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs CTPCY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CTPCY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MARUF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MARUF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MARUY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MARUY trades at $194.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SSUMF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SSUMF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and SSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs SSUMY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SSUMY trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs PITAF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while PITAF trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs BLJZY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs CKHUF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CKHUF trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs CKHUY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CKHUY trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs TYHOF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and TYHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs GPOVY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs GPOVF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while GPOVF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and GPOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs HALMY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while HALMY trades at $79.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs HLMAF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while HLMAF trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs JARLF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while JARLF trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KBDCY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KBDCY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and KBDCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs JMHLY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while JMHLY trades at $45.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -27.99. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SWRBF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SWRBF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and SWRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs SWRAF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SWRAF trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SWRAY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SWRAY trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SCRPF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SCRPF trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KHOLY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KHOLY trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -137.29. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KPELY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KPELY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KPELF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KPELF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SKSUY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SEIBF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MYTHY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MYTHY trades at $51.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MYTHF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MYTHF trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs HYUHF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and HYUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs AYYLF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs FCODF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while FCODF trades at $1,511.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 105.27. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs AYALY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while AYALY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SCVPF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and SCVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs JGSHF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs BDVSF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BDVSF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and BDVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs SZHFF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and SZHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs BDVSY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BDVSY trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KHEXF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and KHEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs BJINF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BJINF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs FOSUY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while FOSUY trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs ALFFF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KTERF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and KTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs FOSUF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KINUF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs AKAAF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while AKAAF trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and AKAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs SMGBF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SMGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and SMGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs JGSMY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while JGSMY trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and JGSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs NARRF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs GULRY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while GULRY trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs GULRF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while GULRF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KBDCF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KBDCF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and KBDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs SWRBY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SWRBY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs IWTNF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while IWTNF trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs TINLF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and TINLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs SGHIF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SGHIF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SGHIY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and SGHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs NLTBF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MMSMY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MMSMY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs TINLY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while TINLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs CHCLY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and CHCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs NICFF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and NICFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs MPCFF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and MPCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs XZJCF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs BNHUF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and BNHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs ALGGY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while ALGGY trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs GRGCF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 950.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while GRGCF trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs BRYAF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 879.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BRYAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs NSHBY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 831.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while NSHBY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs ALGGF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 723.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs MTLZF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and MTLZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs SHMWF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 575.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SHMWF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs KKRAF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and KKRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs INDHF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 532.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while INDHF trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs SBOX Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs CVVIF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs BEVFF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BEVFF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and BEVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs CEEIF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs TJSCF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 261.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while TJSCF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs HGRVF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs DMCHY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 219.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while DMCHY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and DMCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs THAFF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while THAFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs YMAIF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs ICBT Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs NOBGF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT and NOBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
VBVT vs RSDEF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs APTL Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while APTL trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs PRTT Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while PRTT trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -61.50. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs ECSL Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs BNIGF Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.
VBVT vs CIBY Comparison
VBVT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VBVT stands at 247. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VBVT is priced at $0.00, while CIBY trades at $1,742.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VBVT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -118.57. In terms of profitability, VBVT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VBVT is less volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VBVT.