Vivani Medical, Inc.

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SMMNY has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while SMMNY trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMNY's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SMMNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to SMMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check SMMNY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SEMHF has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while SEMHF trades at $49.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMHF's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SEMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to SEMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check SEMHF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, RYLPF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while RYLPF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYLPF's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RYLPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to RYLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check RYLPF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SONVF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while SONVF trades at $252.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONVF's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SONVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to SONVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check SONVF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SONVY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while SONVY trades at $50.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONVY's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SONVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to SONVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check SONVY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SNNUF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while SNNUF trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNNUF's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SNNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to SNNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check SNNUF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CHEOF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CHEOF trades at $180.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEOF's P/E ratio is 43.96. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CHEOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CHEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CHEOF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CHEOY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CHEOY trades at $70.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEOY's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CHEOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CHEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CHEOY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, WILYY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while WILYY trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILYY's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to WILYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to WILYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check WILYY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, WILLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while WILLF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILLF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to WILLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to WILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check WILLF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, GNGBY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while GNGBY trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNGBY's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GNGBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to GNGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check GNGBY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, GNGBF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while GNGBF trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNGBF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GNGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to GNGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check GNGBF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, AMBFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while AMBFF trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBFF's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AMBFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to AMBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check AMBFF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NHNKY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while NHNKY trades at $11.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHNKY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NHNKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to NHNKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check NHNKY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, AMBBY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while AMBBY trades at $12.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBBY's P/E ratio is 40.13. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AMBBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to AMBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check AMBBY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MCRPF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while MCRPF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRPF's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MCRPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to MCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check MCRPF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, GGNDF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while GGNDF trades at $16.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGNDF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GGNDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to GGNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check GGNDF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, GNNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while GNNDY trades at $44.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNNDY's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GNNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to GNNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check GNNDY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, OSSFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while OSSFF trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSSFF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to OSSFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to OSSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check OSSFF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, OSSUY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while OSSUY trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSSUY's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to OSSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to OSSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check OSSUY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, DRWKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while DRWKF trades at $96.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRWKF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DRWKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to DRWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check DRWKF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NHNKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while NHNKF trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHNKF's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NHNKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to NHNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check NHNKF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, DWRKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while DWRKF trades at $543.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWRKF's P/E ratio is 75.94. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DWRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to DWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check DWRKF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MEDGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while MEDGF trades at $83.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEDGF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MEDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to MEDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check MEDGF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, STSEY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while STSEY trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSEY's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to STSEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to STSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check STSEY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, DGWPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while DGWPF trades at $72.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGWPF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DGWPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to DGWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check DGWPF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ELEAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ELEAF trades at $16.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEAF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ELEAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ELEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ELEAF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, VTRLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while VTRLY trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTRLY's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VTRLY's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to VTRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check VTRLY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, FDMDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while FDMDF trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDMDF's P/E ratio is -21.90. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FDMDF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to FDMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check FDMDF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MDRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while MDRSF trades at $100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDRSF's P/E ratio is -1666.67. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MDRSF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to MDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check MDRSF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, LFTSF has a market cap of 858.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while LFTSF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFTSF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LFTSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to LFTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check LFTSF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, XVIPF has a market cap of 740.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while XVIPF trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XVIPF's P/E ratio is 261.33. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to XVIPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to XVIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check XVIPF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, IOBCF has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while IOBCF trades at $18.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOBCF's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to IOBCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to IOBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check IOBCF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, AVMR has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while AVMR trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVMR's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AVMR's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to AVMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check AVMR's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CALZF has a market cap of 472.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CALZF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALZF's P/E ratio is 68.45. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CALZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CALZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CALZF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BRSYF has a market cap of 451.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while BRSYF trades at $11.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSYF's P/E ratio is 72.13. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BRSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to BRSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check BRSYF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CSSPF has a market cap of 384.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CSSPF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSPF's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CSSPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CSSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CSSPF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CLVSF has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CLVSF trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLVSF's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CLVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CLVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CLVSF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CYBQY has a market cap of 363.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CYBQY trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBQY's P/E ratio is -204.00. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CYBQY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CYBQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CYBQY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, HYBT has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while HYBT trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to HYBT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to HYBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check HYBT's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, DMTRF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while DMTRF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMTRF's P/E ratio is -118.50. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DMTRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to DMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check DMTRF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CYBQF has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CYBQF trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBQF's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CYBQF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CYBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CYBQF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, HTLZF has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while HTLZF trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTLZF's P/E ratio is -159.01. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to HTLZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to HTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check HTLZF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, EAPIF has a market cap of 240.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while EAPIF trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAPIF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to EAPIF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to EAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check EAPIF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, IMPZY has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while IMPZY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPZY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to IMPZY's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to IMPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check IMPZY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, VMTHF has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while VMTHF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMTHF's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VMTHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to VMTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check VMTHF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, DTXMF has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while DTXMF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTXMF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DTXMF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is less volatile compared to DTXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check DTXMF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, EKDHF has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while EKDHF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKDHF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to EKDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to EKDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check EKDHF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, PXMBF has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while PXMBF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXMBF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PXMBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to PXMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check PXMBF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, AVHHL has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while AVHHL trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVHHL's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AVHHL's ROE of +4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to AVHHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check AVHHL's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CLLKF has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CLLKF trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLKF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CLLKF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CLLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CLLKF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, AMEUF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while AMEUF trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMEUF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AMEUF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to AMEUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check AMEUF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SOMNF has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while SOMNF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMNF's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SOMNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to SOMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check SOMNF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BCCOY has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while BCCOY trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCOY's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BCCOY's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to BCCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check BCCOY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, JMDMF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while JMDMF trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMDMF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to JMDMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to JMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check JMDMF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, SNZZF has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while SNZZF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNZZF's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SNZZF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to SNZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check SNZZF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, RSHUF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while RSHUF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSHUF's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RSHUF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is less volatile compared to RSHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check RSHUF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CKMTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CKMTF trades at $12.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKMTF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CKMTF's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CKMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CKMTF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, TLTFF has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while TLTFF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTFF's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TLTFF's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to TLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check TLTFF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BLOZF has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while BLOZF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLOZF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BLOZF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to BLOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check BLOZF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BRNHF has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while BRNHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRNHF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BRNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to BRNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check BRNHF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, RDGL has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while RDGL trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDGL's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RDGL's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to RDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check RDGL's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NVYTF has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while NVYTF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVYTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NVYTF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to NVYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check NVYTF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, POSC has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while POSC trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POSC's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to POSC's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to POSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check POSC's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, GTHP has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while GTHP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTHP's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GTHP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to GTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check GTHP's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, IPDQF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while IPDQF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPDQF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to IPDQF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to IPDQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check IPDQF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MKEAF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while MKEAF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKEAF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MKEAF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to MKEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check MKEAF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, KBBTF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while KBBTF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBBTF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to KBBTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to KBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check KBBTF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, PYNKF has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while PYNKF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYNKF's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PYNKF's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to PYNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check PYNKF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, EMITF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while EMITF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMITF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to EMITF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to EMITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check EMITF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, DIZTF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while DIZTF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIZTF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DIZTF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to DIZTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check DIZTF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ASAPF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ASAPF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAPF's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ASAPF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ASAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ASAPF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, VPTDF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while VPTDF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPTDF's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VPTDF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to VPTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check VPTDF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, TMDIF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while TMDIF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMDIF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TMDIF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is less volatile compared to TMDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check TMDIF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ATBPF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ATBPF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATBPF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ATBPF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ATBPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ATBPF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, LXXGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while LXXGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXXGF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LXXGF's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to LXXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check LXXGF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, RMSL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while RMSL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMSL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RMSL's ROE of -12.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to RMSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check RMSL's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ALRTF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ALRTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRTF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ALRTF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ALRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ALRTF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, PLLWF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while PLLWF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLWF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PLLWF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to PLLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check PLLWF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, PMEDF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while PMEDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEDF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PMEDF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to PMEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check PMEDF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, USAQ has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while USAQ trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAQ's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to USAQ's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to USAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check USAQ's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MDXHF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while MDXHF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDXHF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MDXHF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to MDXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check MDXHF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NGMDF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while NGMDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGMDF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NGMDF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to NGMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check NGMDF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, QLIS has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while QLIS trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLIS's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to QLIS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to QLIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check QLIS's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, RHNMF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while RHNMF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHNMF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RHNMF's ROE of +15.91%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to RHNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check RHNMF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BIEL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while BIEL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BIEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to BIEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check BIEL's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, CYDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while CYDX trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYDX's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CYDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to CYDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check CYDX's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ADMT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ADMT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMT's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ADMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ADMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ADMT's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ODYY has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ODYY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODYY's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ODYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ODYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ODYY's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, VYCO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while VYCO trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYCO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VYCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to VYCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check VYCO's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, FZMD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while FZMD trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FZMD's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FZMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to FZMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check FZMD's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, TBRIF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while TBRIF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBRIF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TBRIF's ROE of +16.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to TBRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check TBRIF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, LLBO has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while LLBO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LLBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to LLBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check LLBO's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ESMC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ESMC trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMC's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ESMC's ROE of -125.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ESMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ESMC's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, KLYG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while KLYG trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLYG's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to KLYG's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to KLYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check KLYG's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, VRSEF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while VRSEF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSEF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VRSEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to VRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check VRSEF's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, NUMD has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while NUMD trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUMD's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NUMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to NUMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check NUMD's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, UAHC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while UAHC trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAHC's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to UAHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to UAHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check UAHC's competition here

VANIW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VANIW stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ELXMF has a market cap of 541.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VANIW is priced at $0.01, while ELXMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VANIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELXMF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VANIW's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ELXMF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VANIW is more volatile compared to ELXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VANIW.Check ELXMF's competition here