Pierre et Vacances SA

VAC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VAC.PA stands at 821.1M. In comparison, AC.PA has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC.PA is priced at €1.78, while AC.PA trades at €46.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VAC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 88.90, whereas AC.PA's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, VAC.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AC.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC.PA is more volatile compared to AC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.PA.

VAC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VAC.PA stands at 821.1M. In comparison, DHG.IR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC.PA is priced at €1.78, while DHG.IR trades at €6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VAC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 88.90, whereas DHG.IR's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, VAC.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DHG.IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC.PA is more volatile compared to DHG.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.PA.

VAC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VAC.PA stands at 821.1M. In comparison, MLHMC.PA has a market cap of 318.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC.PA is priced at €1.78, while MLHMC.PA trades at €5,150.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VAC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 88.90, whereas MLHMC.PA's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, VAC.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLHMC.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC.PA is more volatile compared to MLHMC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.PA.

VAC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VAC.PA stands at 821.1M. In comparison, ALLHB.PA has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC.PA is priced at €1.78, while ALLHB.PA trades at €73.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VAC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 88.90, whereas ALLHB.PA's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, VAC.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALLHB.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC.PA is more volatile compared to ALLHB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.PA.

VAC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VAC.PA stands at 821.1M. In comparison, MLHOT.PA has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC.PA is priced at €1.78, while MLHOT.PA trades at €54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VAC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 88.90, whereas MLHOT.PA's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, VAC.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLHOT.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC.PA is more volatile compared to MLHOT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.PA.

VAC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VAC.PA stands at 821.1M. In comparison, HDP.PA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC.PA is priced at €1.78, while HDP.PA trades at €2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VAC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 88.90, whereas HDP.PA's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, VAC.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HDP.PA's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC.PA is more volatile compared to HDP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.PA.

VAC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VAC.PA stands at 821.1M. In comparison, MLHIN.PA has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC.PA is priced at €1.78, while MLHIN.PA trades at €212.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VAC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 88.90, whereas MLHIN.PA's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, VAC.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLHIN.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC.PA is more volatile compared to MLHIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.PA.