VelocityShares 3x Long Crude Oil ETNs linked to the S&P GSCI Crude Oil Index ER New
VelocityShares 3x Long Crude Oil ETNs linked to the S&P GSCI Crude Oil Index ER New UWT Peers
See (UWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWT | $0.16 | -1.27% | 17.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTIP | $49.93 | -0.08% | 58.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| VTAPX | $25.06 | +0.12% | 58.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.74% |
| VFSTX | $10.39 | +0.10% | 52.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.25% |
| VFSUX | $10.39 | +0.10% | 52.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.35% |
| VSBSX | $19.52 | +0.05% | 27.6B | N/A | N/A | +4.15% |
| VGSH | $58.51 | -0.05% | 27.6B | N/A | N/A | +4.17% |
| VWSTX | $15.77 | +0.06% | 15.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
UWT vs FIYY Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FFEU Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VTIP Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VTIP trades at $49.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VTAPX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VTAPX trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VFSTX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VFSTX trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VFSUX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VFSUX trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VSBSX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VSBSX trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VGSH Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VGSH trades at $58.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VWSTX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VWSTX trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs MINT Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while MINT trades at $100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs ASBFX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while ASBFX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SCHO Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SCHO trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs PTSHX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while PTSHX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FTSM Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FTSM trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FNGU Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FNGU trades at $353.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VFISX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VFISX trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SPTS Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SPTS trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TMF Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TMF trades at $35.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VSGDX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VSGDX trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs VSGBX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while VSGBX trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SPXL Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SPXL trades at $150.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs JSDHX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while JSDHX trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FLVCX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FLVCX trades at $38.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs BITX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while BITX trades at $55.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TBLL Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TBLL trades at $105.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TECL Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TECL trades at $72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FAS Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FAS trades at $153.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs PAIAX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while PAIAX trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FSTTX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FSTTX trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DHLSX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DHLSX trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DIAYX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DIAYX trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DHFCX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DWT Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs ORSTX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SH Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SH trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs PRFSX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while PRFSX trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs BASOX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while BASOX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs ACSNX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while ACSNX trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs CPLSX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while CPLSX trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs BULZ Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 843.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while BULZ trades at $138.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 46.23. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TUA Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 764.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TUA trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TAFI Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TAFI trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs EXMAX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 730.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while EXMAX trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs EMAIX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 730.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while EMAIX trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs RYVYX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 728.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while RYVYX trades at $536.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs RYCCX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 728.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while RYCCX trades at $376.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SOXS Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 699.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SOXS trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs RYVLX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while RYVLX trades at $536.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs PSQ Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while PSQ trades at $36.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SVXY Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SVXY trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SVIX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 597.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SVIX trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs JSCP Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 589.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while JSCP trades at $47.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs GDXU Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 582.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while GDXU trades at $68.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DPST Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 547.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DPST trades at $76.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SPXU Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SPXU trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs BPRRX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 509.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while BPRRX trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs NVDX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 509.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while NVDX trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 55.61. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs BPIRX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 508.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while BPIRX trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs KOLD Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while KOLD trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DGAZ Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs GIYAX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while GIYAX trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs NUGT Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 485.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while NUGT trades at $70.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FSMB Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 447.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FSMB trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SDS Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 411.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SDS trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DXQLX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DXQLX trades at $91.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SDHY Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 397M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SDHY trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SPXS Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SPXS trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FNGO Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FNGO trades at $94.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 42.49. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FSHSX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FSHSX trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DUST Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 363.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DUST trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SEMRX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 354.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SEMRX trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs MRRL Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FLGE Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs MORL Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs UUP Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 282.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while UUP trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs JNUG Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while JNUG trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs QID Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while QID trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs UVXY Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 269.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while UVXY trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SMB Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SMB trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TZA Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TZA trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TENG Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs STOT Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while STOT trades at $47.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs NAIL Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while NAIL trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FTSD Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FTSD trades at $90.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs GGLL Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while GGLL trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TWUSX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TWUSX trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SDOW Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SDOW trades at $47.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs REML Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs RWM Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while RWM trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs FUMB Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while FUMB trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs USDU Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while USDU trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs GUSH Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while GUSH trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs AMZU Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while AMZU trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs ERX Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while ERX trades at $47.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs TMV Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while TMV trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs EMNT Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while EMNT trades at $98.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs CVSB Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while CVSB trades at $50.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs SPDN Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SPDN has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while SPDN trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPDN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to SPDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.
UWT vs DFEN Comparison
UWT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWT stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWT is priced at $0.16, while DFEN trades at $42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, UWT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWT is more volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWT.