NameSilo Technologies Corp.
NameSilo Technologies Corp. URLOF Peers
See (URLOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URLOF | $0.69 | +1.27% | 62.34M | 69.37 | $0.01 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $300.76 | +0.73% | 350.87B | 55.08 | $5.46 | +0.87% |
| CNSWF | $3,525.47 | -0.21% | 74.71B | 100.79 | $34.98 | +0.11% |
| NEMKY | $20.50 | N/A | 59.19B | 60.29 | $0.34 | +1.04% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.12B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTF | $38.27 | -3.49% | 50.26B | 38.27 | $1.00 | +0.71% |
| DASTY | $38.03 | -0.31% | 49.95B | 38.03 | $1.00 | +0.66% |
| WIGBY | $65.42 | +0.00% | 21.71B | 109.04 | $0.60 | +0.20% |
| DIDIY | $4.94 | +3.56% | 21.50B | 164.67 | $0.03 | N/A |
| WTCHF | $63.30 | -4.12% | 21.00B | 105.50 | $0.60 | +0.17% |
Stock Comparison
URLOF vs SAPGF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 350.87B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SAPGF trades at $300.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 55.08. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs CNSWF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 74.71B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while CNSWF trades at $3,525.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 100.79. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NEMKY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 59.19B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NEMKY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs INVUP Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.12B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs DASTF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 50.26B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while DASTF trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs DASTY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 49.95B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while DASTY trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs WIGBY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 21.71B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while WIGBY trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 109.04. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs DIDIY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 21.50B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while DIDIY trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 164.67. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs WTCHF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 21.00B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while WTCHF trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 105.50. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs XROLF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.16B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while XROLF trades at $111.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 129.94. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SGGEF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.57B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SGGEF trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SGPYY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.30B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SGPYY trades at $66.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NEMTF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 72.26. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs OBIIF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 12.80B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while OBIIF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs OCLCF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 11.97B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NCSYF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NCSYF trades at $161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ALMFF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs THNOF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs KGDEY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while KGDEY trades at $156.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -284.92. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs HOILF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TMNSF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TMSNY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TMSNY trades at $73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs FNOXF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs LIFX Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while LIFX trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 472.13. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SMCYY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SICRF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs KXSCF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while KXSCF trades at $142.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 418.44. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SRBEF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SRBEF trades at $213.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -75.07. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ASOZY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ASOZY trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ASOZF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TMVWF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TMVWY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TMVWY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs UBMRF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs QTGPF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while QTGPF trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs KHOTF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ESKEF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs IPEU Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs FREKF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while FREKF trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs WEMXF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TMOAY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TMOAY trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -34.62. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs MAGTF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs KNNNF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SWONF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ZEUCF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs VOBIF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while VOBIF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs EGHSF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while EGHSF trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs LTTHF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs GBGPF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 966.99M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 96.25. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ESIGF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.30M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs BTRCF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 811.66M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while BTRCF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SLVFF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.24M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs BVSFF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.45M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TTMZF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 643.17M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TMOAF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.66M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs BCTCF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.35M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NPACF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.51M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs PXPHF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.35M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NPACY Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.66M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs RWWI Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 505.25M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while RWWI trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NXLLF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.10M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NSWEF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.31M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TCYSF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 458.88M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TCYSF trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 220.93. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs BRDLF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.33M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs BLKLF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 452.68M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while BLKLF trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -76.71. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs IQGLF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.88M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs CHNVF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.86M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs CMDXF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 398.17M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while CMDXF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs RPGHF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 375.02M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs PSSWF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.50M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs LCHTF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.21M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs PLDIF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 362.45M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while PLDIF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs JAPPF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.66M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ELMFF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.28M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs RLLMF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 316.75M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while RLLMF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 214.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs BAINF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 307.83M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while BAINF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 134.50. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs DOTDF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.78M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs IVUFF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 295.99M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs CIGMF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.78M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs GBUX Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 278.99M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while GBUX trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs LOQPF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270.23M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while LOQPF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs EXMXF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.38M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs ABXXF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 266.64M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while ABXXF trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs DAHLF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.46M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs FXSRF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.57M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs FBSFF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 195.53M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while FBSFF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs MCAP Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 194.05M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while MCAP trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SMTEF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 173.05M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SMTEF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs WONDF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 162.80M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs SYZLF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 155.45M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while SYZLF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -332.30. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs IARGF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.43M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs EXSPF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.82M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs CBSZF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.34M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs TCIIF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150.96M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs DFORF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 140.30M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while DFORF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs WECMF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.17M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs NEOJF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 135.32M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while NEOJF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs THNCF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, THNCF has a market cap of 126.47M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while THNCF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas THNCF's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to THNCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to THNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs PSHPF Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 125.66M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.
URLOF vs RTME Comparison
URLOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URLOF stands at 62.34M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 125.02M. Regarding current trading prices, URLOF is priced at $0.69, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URLOF currently has a P/E ratio of 69.37, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, URLOF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URLOF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URLOF.