URA Holdings Plc
URA Holdings Plc URAH.L Peers
See (URAH.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URAH.L | $1.00 | -4.48% | 3.04M | -1.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FRES.L | $1,000.00 | -1.57% | 7.37B | 71.43 | $0.14 | +1.49% |
| POLY.L | $215.00 | +30.30% | 1.02B | -4.48 | -$0.48 | N/A |
| THS.L | $61.50 | +0.82% | 181.55M | 3.08 | $0.20 | +5.77% |
| SLP.L | $49.50 | +1.02% | 128.75M | 16.50 | $0.03 | +2.77% |
| EUA.L | $4.15 | -4.05% | 122.48M | -4.15 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| EEE.L | $10.05 | -1.47% | 64.55M | -10.05 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| GMET.L | $42.00 | -0.83% | 56.42M | -42.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| GEM.L | $4.20 | +2.67% | 49.06M | -0.84 | -$0.05 | +16.01% |
| PDL.L | $22.20 | -3.48% | 43.11M | -0.41 | -$0.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
URAH.L vs FRES.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 7.37B. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while FRES.L trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 71.43. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs POLY.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while POLY.L trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. URAH.L has daily volatility of 9.22 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.
URAH.L vs THS.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 181.55M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while THS.L trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs SLP.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SLP.L has a market cap of 128.75M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while SLP.L trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SLP.L's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SLP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to SLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs EUA.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 122.48M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while EUA.L trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs EEE.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 64.55M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while EEE.L trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs GMET.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 56.42M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while GMET.L trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs GEM.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 49.06M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while GEM.L trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs PDL.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 43.11M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while PDL.L trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs 0V7B.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 27.17M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while 0V7B.L trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs HEX.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 23.31M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while HEX.L trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs 0V6Y.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while 0V6Y.L trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs 0A4V.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 16.22M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while 0A4V.L trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs GEMD.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 11.48M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while GEMD.L trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs COBR.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 11.42M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while COBR.L trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is less volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs UFO.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 6.82M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while UFO.L trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs FME.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 3.95M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while FME.L trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is less volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs ROCK.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while ROCK.L trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs FMET.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while FMET.L trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs SEFA.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while SEFA.L trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs BOD.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, BOD.L has a market cap of 1.80M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while BOD.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BOD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to BOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs CMRS.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while CMRS.L trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is less volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs KDR.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while KDR.L trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs BRD.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929180.00. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while BRD.L trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. URAH.L has daily volatility of 9.22 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.
URAH.L vs NTVO.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 531412.00. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while NTVO.L trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs GEMR.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GEMR.L has a market cap of 507791.00. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while GEMR.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GEMR.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GEMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to GEMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.
URAH.L vs PERE.L Comparison
URAH.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URAH.L stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218172.00. Regarding current trading prices, URAH.L is priced at $1.00, while PERE.L trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URAH.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, URAH.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, URAH.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URAH.L.