Global X Uranium ETF
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (URA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URA | $39.44 | +6.08% | 4.5B | 30.24 | $1.30 | +1.95% |
| APO | $134.20 | +0.14% | 76.8B | 25.05 | $5.36 | +1.44% |
| SGENX | $80.13 | +1.40% | 62.2B | 18.45 | $4.27 | N/A |
| FEGRX | $80.78 | +1.41% | 62.2B | 18.46 | $4.31 | N/A |
| SGIIX | $80.72 | +1.39% | 62.2B | 18.98 | $4.19 | N/A |
| FESGX | $76.12 | +1.39% | 62.2B | 18.93 | $3.96 | N/A |
| APO-PA | $71.12 | +0.44% | 40.7B | 8.55 | $8.32 | +1.44% |
| GBLEX | $40.63 | +0.74% | 28.2B | 20.85 | $1.93 | N/A |
| AGVEX | $27.07 | +0.97% | 17.6B | 26.69 | $1.00 | N/A |
| MDLOX | $19.92 | +1.53% | 16.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
URA vs APO Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while APO trades at $134.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APO's competition here
URA vs SGENX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while SGENX trades at $80.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGENX's competition here
URA vs FEGRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while FEGRX trades at $80.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FEGRX's competition here
URA vs SGIIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while SGIIX trades at $80.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGIIX's competition here
URA vs FESGX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while FESGX trades at $76.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FESGX's competition here
URA vs APO-PA Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, APO-PA has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while APO-PA trades at $71.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas APO-PA's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APO-PA's competition here
URA vs GBLEX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while GBLEX trades at $40.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GBLEX's competition here
URA vs AGVEX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while AGVEX trades at $27.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check AGVEX's competition here
URA vs MDLOX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while MDLOX trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MDLOX's competition here
URA vs FSGGX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while FSGGX trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FSGGX's competition here
URA vs GLIFX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while GLIFX trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GLIFX's competition here
URA vs GLFOX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while GLFOX trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GLFOX's competition here
URA vs PAVE Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PAVE trades at $46.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PAVE's competition here
URA vs AAM-PA Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check AAM-PA's competition here
URA vs AAM-PB Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check AAM-PB's competition here
URA vs QYLD Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while QYLD trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check QYLD's competition here
URA vs JAGCX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JAGCX trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAGCX's competition here
URA vs JATNX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JATNX trades at $73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATNX's competition here
URA vs JNGTX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JNGTX trades at $73.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JNGTX's competition here
URA vs JATAX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JATAX trades at $69.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATAX's competition here
URA vs JATIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JATIX trades at $74.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATIX's competition here
URA vs JATSX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JATSX trades at $66.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATSX's competition here
URA vs JAGTX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JAGTX trades at $71.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAGTX's competition here
URA vs VHGEX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while VHGEX trades at $41.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VHGEX's competition here
URA vs PAGSX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PAGSX trades at $68.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PAGSX's competition here
URA vs PRGSX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PRGSX trades at $70.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRGSX's competition here
URA vs DFGEX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while DFGEX trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check DFGEX's competition here
URA vs CGGO Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CGGO trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CGGO's competition here
URA vs PGGFX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PGGFX trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PGGFX's competition here
URA vs PRJQX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PRJQX trades at $47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRJQX's competition here
URA vs PRJZX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PRJZX trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRJZX's competition here
URA vs ACWV Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while ACWV trades at $120.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check ACWV's competition here
URA vs PRGTX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PRGTX trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRGTX's competition here
URA vs IOO Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while IOO trades at $114.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check IOO's competition here
URA vs GUNR Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while GUNR trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GUNR's competition here
URA vs JDWAX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JDWAX trades at $128.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JDWAX's competition here
URA vs JDWNX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JDWNX trades at $126.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JDWNX's competition here
URA vs JWGRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JWGRX trades at $128.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JWGRX's competition here
URA vs JWWFX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JWWFX trades at $129.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JWWFX's competition here
URA vs JWWCX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JWWCX trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JWWCX's competition here
URA vs JDWRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JDWRX trades at $126.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JDWRX's competition here
URA vs JAWWX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JAWWX trades at $126.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAWWX's competition here
URA vs JFNCX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JFNCX trades at $58.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNCX's competition here
URA vs JFNNX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JFNNX trades at $69.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNNX's competition here
URA vs JFNIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JFNIX trades at $69.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNIX's competition here
URA vs JFNSX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JFNSX trades at $65.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNSX's competition here
URA vs JAGLX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JAGLX trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAGLX's competition here
URA vs JFNAX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JFNAX trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNAX's competition here
URA vs JNGLX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JNGLX trades at $69.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JNGLX's competition here
URA vs CTCAX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CTCAX trades at $98.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 36.77. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTCAX's competition here
URA vs CGTUX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CGTUX trades at $107.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CGTUX's competition here
URA vs CTHCX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CTHCX trades at $83.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 36.76. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTHCX's competition here
URA vs CMTFX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CMTFX trades at $104.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CMTFX's competition here
URA vs CTHRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CTHRX trades at $107.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTHRX's competition here
URA vs REET Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while REET trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check REET's competition here
URA vs VNQI Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while VNQI trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNQI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VNQI's competition here
URA vs CTYRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTYRX's competition here
URA vs DGSIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while DGSIX trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check DGSIX's competition here
URA vs BGHIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while BGHIX trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check BGHIX's competition here
URA vs MGGIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while MGGIX trades at $40.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MGGIX's competition here
URA vs MGGPX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while MGGPX trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MGGPX's competition here
URA vs GNR Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while GNR trades at $57.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GNR's competition here
URA vs IXJ Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while IXJ trades at $88.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check IXJ's competition here
URA vs XYLD Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, XYLD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while XYLD trades at $38.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas XYLD's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to XYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check XYLD's competition here
URA vs BOTZ Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while BOTZ trades at $33.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check BOTZ's competition here
URA vs LSWWX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while LSWWX trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check LSWWX's competition here
URA vs LGMCX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while LGMCX trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check LGMCX's competition here
URA vs LGMAX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while LGMAX trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check LGMAX's competition here
URA vs NFRA Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while NFRA trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check NFRA's competition here
URA vs APDGX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while APDGX trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APDGX's competition here
URA vs ARTGX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while ARTGX trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check ARTGX's competition here
URA vs APHGX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while APHGX trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APHGX's competition here
URA vs MSFBX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MSFBX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while MSFBX trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas MSFBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFBX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MSFBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MSFBX's competition here
URA vs MSFLX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MSFLX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while MSFLX trades at $34.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas MSFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MSFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MSFLX's competition here
URA vs MLPX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while MLPX trades at $60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MLPX's competition here
URA vs SGTTX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while SGTTX trades at $87.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGTTX's competition here
URA vs DFGR Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while DFGR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check DFGR's competition here
URA vs CCHRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CCHRX's competition here
URA vs JORIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JORIX trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORIX's competition here
URA vs JORAX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JORAX trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORAX's competition here
URA vs CSGZX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while CSGZX trades at $86.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CSGZX's competition here
URA vs JORFX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JORFX trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORFX's competition here
URA vs JORNX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JORNX trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORNX's competition here
URA vs JSLNX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JSLNX trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JSLNX's competition here
URA vs VGWAX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while VGWAX trades at $34.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VGWAX's competition here
URA vs VGWLX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while VGWLX trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VGWLX's competition here
URA vs JORRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JORRX trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORRX's competition here
URA vs BIALX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while BIALX trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check BIALX's competition here
URA vs JORCX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while JORCX trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORCX's competition here
URA vs OPGIX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while OPGIX trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check OPGIX's competition here
URA vs GCOW Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while GCOW trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GCOW's competition here
URA vs PFFD Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while PFFD trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PFFD's competition here
URA vs FTGC Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FTGC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while FTGC trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas FTGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FTGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FTGC's competition here
URA vs SGTRX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGTRX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while SGTRX trades at $76.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas SGTRX's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGTRX's competition here
URA vs IILGX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while IILGX trades at $30.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check IILGX's competition here
URA vs SIL Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SIL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while SIL trades at $55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas SIL's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SIL's competition here
URA vs MWEFX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MWEFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while MWEFX trades at $47.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas MWEFX's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MWEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MWEFX's competition here
URA vs VMNVX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VMNVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while VMNVX trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas VMNVX's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMNVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VMNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VMNVX's competition here
URA vs VMVFX Comparison August 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VMVFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $39.44, while VMVFX trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 30.24, whereas VMVFX's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMVFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VMVFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VMVFX's competition here