Global X Uranium ETF
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (URA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URA | $40.99 | -2.01% | 3.8B | 31.50 | $1.30 | +1.87% |
| APO | $148.70 | -1.61% | 85B | 25.95 | $5.73 | +1.28% |
| SGIIX | $77.89 | -0.76% | 62.3B | 18.75 | $4.19 | N/A |
| FESGX | $73.50 | -0.78% | 62.3B | 18.71 | $3.96 | N/A |
| SGENX | $77.32 | -0.77% | 62.3B | 18.22 | $4.27 | N/A |
| FEGRX | $77.94 | -0.76% | 62.3B | 18.23 | $4.31 | N/A |
| APO-PA | $78.00 | -1.22% | 44.4B | 9.34 | $8.32 | +1.28% |
| GBLEX | $40.09 | -0.35% | 28B | 20.84 | $1.93 | N/A |
| AGVEX | $26.70 | -0.63% | 17.4B | 26.85 | $1.00 | N/A |
| MDLOX | $19.66 | -0.46% | 16.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
URA vs APO Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while APO trades at $148.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APO's competition here
URA vs SGIIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while SGIIX trades at $77.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGIIX's competition here
URA vs FESGX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while FESGX trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FESGX's competition here
URA vs SGENX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while SGENX trades at $77.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGENX's competition here
URA vs FEGRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while FEGRX trades at $77.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FEGRX's competition here
URA vs APO-PA Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APO-PA has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while APO-PA trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas APO-PA's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APO-PA's competition here
URA vs GBLEX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while GBLEX trades at $40.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GBLEX's competition here
URA vs AGVEX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while AGVEX trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check AGVEX's competition here
URA vs MDLOX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while MDLOX trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MDLOX's competition here
URA vs FSGGX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while FSGGX trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FSGGX's competition here
URA vs GLIFX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while GLIFX trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GLIFX's competition here
URA vs GLFOX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while GLFOX trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GLFOX's competition here
URA vs AAM-PA Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check AAM-PA's competition here
URA vs AAM-PB Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check AAM-PB's competition here
URA vs PAVE Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PAVE trades at $46.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PAVE's competition here
URA vs QYLD Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while QYLD trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check QYLD's competition here
URA vs VHGEX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while VHGEX trades at $40.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VHGEX's competition here
URA vs JATAX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JATAX trades at $70.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATAX's competition here
URA vs JAGTX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JAGTX trades at $72.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAGTX's competition here
URA vs JAGCX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JAGCX trades at $56.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAGCX's competition here
URA vs JNGTX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JNGTX trades at $73.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JNGTX's competition here
URA vs JATSX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JATSX trades at $67.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATSX's competition here
URA vs JATIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JATIX trades at $74.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATIX's competition here
URA vs JATNX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JATNX trades at $73.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JATNX's competition here
URA vs DFGEX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while DFGEX trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check DFGEX's competition here
URA vs PRGSX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PRGSX trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRGSX's competition here
URA vs PAGSX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PAGSX trades at $67.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PAGSX's competition here
URA vs PGGFX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PGGFX trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PGGFX's competition here
URA vs PRJZX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PRJZX trades at $47.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRJZX's competition here
URA vs PRJQX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PRJQX trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRJQX's competition here
URA vs CGGO Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CGGO trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CGGO's competition here
URA vs ACWV Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while ACWV trades at $117.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check ACWV's competition here
URA vs JDWNX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JDWNX trades at $124.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JDWNX's competition here
URA vs PRGTX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PRGTX trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PRGTX's competition here
URA vs IOO Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while IOO trades at $112.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check IOO's competition here
URA vs GUNR Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while GUNR trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GUNR's competition here
URA vs JWGRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JWGRX trades at $127.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JWGRX's competition here
URA vs JFNAX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JFNAX trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNAX's competition here
URA vs JFNCX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JFNCX trades at $55.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNCX's competition here
URA vs JNGLX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JNGLX trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JNGLX's competition here
URA vs JFNNX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JFNNX trades at $66.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNNX's competition here
URA vs JFNSX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JFNSX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNSX's competition here
URA vs JFNIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JFNIX trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JFNIX's competition here
URA vs JAGLX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JAGLX trades at $66.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAGLX's competition here
URA vs JDWAX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JDWAX trades at $126.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JDWAX's competition here
URA vs JWWCX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JWWCX trades at $120.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JWWCX's competition here
URA vs JWWFX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JWWFX trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JWWFX's competition here
URA vs JAWWX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JAWWX trades at $124.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JAWWX's competition here
URA vs JDWRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JDWRX trades at $124.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JDWRX's competition here
URA vs REET Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while REET trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check REET's competition here
URA vs CMTFX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CMTFX trades at $104.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CMTFX's competition here
URA vs CTCAX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CTCAX trades at $98.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTCAX's competition here
URA vs CTHCX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CTHCX trades at $83.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 37.77. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTHCX's competition here
URA vs CTHRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CTHRX trades at $106.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTHRX's competition here
URA vs CGTUX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CGTUX trades at $107.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 40.42. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CGTUX's competition here
URA vs VNQI Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while VNQI trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNQI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VNQI's competition here
URA vs CTYRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CTYRX's competition here
URA vs DGSIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while DGSIX trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check DGSIX's competition here
URA vs BGHIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while BGHIX trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check BGHIX's competition here
URA vs MGGPX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while MGGPX trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MGGPX's competition here
URA vs MGGIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while MGGIX trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MGGIX's competition here
URA vs IXJ Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while IXJ trades at $86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check IXJ's competition here
URA vs XYLD Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, XYLD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while XYLD trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas XYLD's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to XYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check XYLD's competition here
URA vs LGMAX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while LGMAX trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check LGMAX's competition here
URA vs LGMCX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while LGMCX trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check LGMCX's competition here
URA vs LSWWX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while LSWWX trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check LSWWX's competition here
URA vs APDGX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while APDGX trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APDGX's competition here
URA vs ARTGX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while ARTGX trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check ARTGX's competition here
URA vs APHGX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while APHGX trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check APHGX's competition here
URA vs GNR Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while GNR trades at $56.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GNR's competition here
URA vs BOTZ Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while BOTZ trades at $34.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check BOTZ's competition here
URA vs NFRA Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while NFRA trades at $60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check NFRA's competition here
URA vs MSFBX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MSFBX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while MSFBX trades at $34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas MSFBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFBX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MSFBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MSFBX's competition here
URA vs MSFLX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MSFLX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while MSFLX trades at $34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas MSFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MSFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MSFLX's competition here
URA vs MLPX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while MLPX trades at $60.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MLPX's competition here
URA vs CCHRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CCHRX's competition here
URA vs JORIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JORIX trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORIX's competition here
URA vs JORAX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JORAX trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORAX's competition here
URA vs VGWAX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while VGWAX trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VGWAX's competition here
URA vs VGWLX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while VGWLX trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VGWLX's competition here
URA vs JORFX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JORFX trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORFX's competition here
URA vs JORNX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JORNX trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORNX's competition here
URA vs JSLNX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JSLNX trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JSLNX's competition here
URA vs SGTTX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while SGTTX trades at $84.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGTTX's competition here
URA vs CSGZX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while CSGZX trades at $83.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check CSGZX's competition here
URA vs JORRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JORRX trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORRX's competition here
URA vs DFGR Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while DFGR trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check DFGR's competition here
URA vs OPGIX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while OPGIX trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check OPGIX's competition here
URA vs BIALX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while BIALX trades at $29.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check BIALX's competition here
URA vs JORCX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while JORCX trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check JORCX's competition here
URA vs FTGC Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FTGC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while FTGC trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas FTGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to FTGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check FTGC's competition here
URA vs GCOW Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while GCOW trades at $38.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check GCOW's competition here
URA vs PFFD Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while PFFD trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check PFFD's competition here
URA vs SGTRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGTRX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while SGTRX trades at $73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas SGTRX's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to SGTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check SGTRX's competition here
URA vs MWEFX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MWEFX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while MWEFX trades at $47.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas MWEFX's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to MWEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check MWEFX's competition here
URA vs IILGX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while IILGX trades at $30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check IILGX's competition here
URA vs ARTRX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARTRX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while ARTRX trades at $34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas ARTRX's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to ARTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check ARTRX's competition here
URA vs VMVFX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VMVFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while VMVFX trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas VMVFX's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMVFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VMVFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VMVFX's competition here
URA vs VMNVX Comparison July 2025
URA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, URA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VMNVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, URA is priced at $40.99, while VMNVX trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
URA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.50, whereas VMNVX's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, URA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMNVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, URA is more volatile compared to VMNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for URA.Check VMNVX's competition here