UP Global Sourcing Holdings plc
UP Global Sourcing Holdings plc UPGS.L Peers
See (UPGS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPGS.L | £120.00 | +5.26% | 107.2M | 8.57 | £0.14 | N/A |
| 0MDT.IL | £72.44 | +6.93% | 19B | -5.41 | -£13.40 | N/A |
| HWDN.L | £834.00 | -3.70% | 4.6B | 18.53 | £0.45 | +1.87% |
| 0R6V.L | £11.70 | +2.09% | 505M | 10.35 | £1.13 | +7.69% |
| 0N9Z.L | £35.90 | +0.56% | 484.2M | 13.97 | £2.57 | +2.64% |
| 0OPA.L | £18.15 | +0.02% | 476.4M | 7.98 | £2.28 | +4.24% |
| DFS.L | £167.00 | -1.47% | 385.2M | 55.67 | £0.03 | N/A |
| VCP.L | £70.00 | -1.13% | 80M | -0.35 | -£2.02 | N/A |
| CHH.L | £675.00 | +0.00% | 74.2M | 11.64 | £0.58 | +4.63% |
| HEAD.L | £90.00 | +2.27% | 72.2M | -2.90 | -£0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UPGS.L vs 0MDT.IL Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, 0MDT.IL has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while 0MDT.IL trades at £72.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas 0MDT.IL's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0MDT.IL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0MDT.IL has daily volatility of 5.05.
UPGS.L vs HWDN.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, HWDN.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while HWDN.L trades at £834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas HWDN.L's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HWDN.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and HWDN.L has daily volatility of 5.38.
UPGS.L vs 0R6V.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, 0R6V.L has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while 0R6V.L trades at £11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas 0R6V.L's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0R6V.L's ROE of +9.99%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0R6V.L has daily volatility of 0.51.
UPGS.L vs 0N9Z.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, 0N9Z.L has a market cap of 484.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while 0N9Z.L trades at £35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas 0N9Z.L's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0N9Z.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0N9Z.L has daily volatility of 0.70.
UPGS.L vs 0OPA.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, 0OPA.L has a market cap of 476.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while 0OPA.L trades at £18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas 0OPA.L's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0OPA.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0OPA.L has daily volatility of 1.38.
UPGS.L vs DFS.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, DFS.L has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while DFS.L trades at £167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DFS.L's P/E ratio is 55.67. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DFS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and DFS.L has daily volatility of 5.37.
UPGS.L vs VCP.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, VCP.L has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while VCP.L trades at £70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas VCP.L's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VCP.L's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and VCP.L has daily volatility of 4.06.
UPGS.L vs CHH.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, CHH.L has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while CHH.L trades at £675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CHH.L's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and CHH.L has daily volatility of 5.71.
UPGS.L vs HEAD.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, HEAD.L has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while HEAD.L trades at £90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas HEAD.L's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HEAD.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and HEAD.L has daily volatility of 4.31.
UPGS.L vs LIKE.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, LIKE.L has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while LIKE.L trades at £23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LIKE.L's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LIKE.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and LIKE.L has daily volatility of 4.21.
UPGS.L vs ULTP.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, ULTP.L has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while ULTP.L trades at £55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ULTP.L's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ULTP.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and ULTP.L has daily volatility of 6.52.
UPGS.L vs CFX.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, CFX.L has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while CFX.L trades at £780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CFX.L's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFX.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and CFX.L has daily volatility of 0.26.
UPGS.L vs SDG.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, SDG.L has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while SDG.L trades at £54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SDG.L's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SDG.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and SDG.L has daily volatility of 9.17.
UPGS.L vs PMP.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, PMP.L has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while PMP.L trades at £137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PMP.L's P/E ratio is 68.75. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PMP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and PMP.L has daily volatility of 2.01.
UPGS.L vs JLH.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, JLH.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while JLH.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JLH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JLH.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and JLH.L has daily volatility of 0.00.
UPGS.L vs EVE.L Comparison
UPGS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPGS.L stands at 107.2M. In comparison, EVE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UPGS.L is priced at £120.00, while EVE.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas EVE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPGS.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVE.L's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A and EVE.L has daily volatility of N/A.