Unit Corporation
Unit Corporation UNTCW Peers
See (UNTCW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNTCW | $0.39 | +14.04% | 3.8M | 0.07 | $5.26 | +25.51% |
| RYDAF | $34.40 | +1.48% | 205.2B | 15.71 | $2.19 | +4.08% |
| PCCYF | $0.85 | -1.79% | 204B | 6.54 | $0.13 | +7.43% |
| TTFNF | $59.51 | +0.54% | 132.1B | 9.97 | $5.97 | +5.70% |
| SNPMF | $0.53 | -5.36% | 87.8B | 8.83 | $0.06 | +1.27% |
| BPAQF | $4.91 | +0.15% | 76.6B | -70.11 | -$0.07 | +6.52% |
| STOHF | $24.06 | N/A | 65.8B | 7.61 | $3.16 | +4.76% |
| OMVKY | $12.45 | +0.40% | 65.1B | 13.53 | $0.92 | +9.29% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | N/A | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UNTCW vs RYDAF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 205.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while RYDAF trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PCCYF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PCCYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs TTFNF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while TTFNF trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs SNPMF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while SNPMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs BPAQF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while BPAQF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -70.11. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs STOHF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 65.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while STOHF trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs OMVKY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while OMVKY trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs RNFTF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs LUKOY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs EIPAF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while EIPAF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PETFF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PETFF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs GLPEY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while GLPEY trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PUTRY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PUTRY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PUTRF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PUTRF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PSKOF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PSKOF trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs OMVJF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while OMVJF trades at $49.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs REPYF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while REPYF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs REPYY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while REPYY trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs OGFGF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while OGFGF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs GLPEF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while GLPEF trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs OGFGY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while OGFGY trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs MGYOY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while MGYOY trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs OAOFY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs SLTQY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs HLPMF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while HLPMF trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 38.78. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs ISRMF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while ISRMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs RTEXF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs WDGJY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs UNTC Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while UNTC trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs WDGJF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 247.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while WDGJF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PXPEF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs SEGYY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs ECTM Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while ECTM trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs OKMN Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs GRGUF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs POGS Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 813.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while POGS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs AEDC Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs TRNX Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PEMC Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs SNVP Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs FRMC Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs PGAS Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs BNXR Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs AMNE Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs NUSPQ Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs RRRI Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs SNPTY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs POGWY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs OJSCY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs VCOGF Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.
UNTCW vs SGTZY Comparison
UNTCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNTCW stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNTCW is priced at $0.39, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNTCW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, UNTCW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNTCW is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNTCW.