Uni-President China Holdings Ltd
Uni-President China Holdings Ltd UNPSF Peers
See (UNPSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNPSF | $0.89 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 14.77 | $0.06 | +6.71% |
| NNFSF | $5.03 | +0.00% | 56.6B | 33.53 | $0.15 | +2.08% |
| CCHGY | $54.52 | +0.91% | 19.8B | 20.61 | $2.64 | +2.06% |
| CCHBF | $52.65 | +0.00% | 19.1B | 20.10 | $2.62 | +2.38% |
| EMBVF | $10.39 | -2.23% | 17.6B | 14.84 | $0.70 | +2.99% |
| ITONF | $61.41 | +0.00% | 12.7B | 87.73 | $0.70 | +0.62% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.03% |
| YKLTY | $8.56 | -6.86% | 5.2B | 17.33 | $0.51 | +1.52% |
| YKLTF | $17.79 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 17.44 | $1.02 | +1.27% |
| COCSF | $9.18 | -2.29% | 4.6B | 15.04 | $0.61 | +3.76% |
Stock Comparison
UNPSF vs NNFSF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while NNFSF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs CCHGY Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while CCHGY trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs CCHBF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while CCHBF trades at $52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs EMBVF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while EMBVF trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs ITONF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs BTVCY Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and BTVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs YKLTY Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while YKLTY trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs YKLTF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while YKLTF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs COCSF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while COCSF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs BTVCF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs CCOJY Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while CCOJY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 105.71. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs CCOJF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and CCOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs ITOEF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and ITOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs YNAJF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while YNAJF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs OSOPF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and OSOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs FQVTF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while FQVTF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs LSDAF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while LSDAF trades at $157.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs BAGFF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and BAGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs NJMVF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and NJMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs HAATF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while HAATF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs UPCHY Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while UPCHY trades at $116.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs CHFHY Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs PDPG Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs JSDA Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while JSDA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs MOJO Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while MOJO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs KRTL Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while KRTL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs HIRU Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs RVBR Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while RVBR trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs FLWBF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while FLWBF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs APRU Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and APRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs DRNK Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs PLVFF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and PLVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs RMHB Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs PURT Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs INKW Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs AQPW Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while AQPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and AQPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs ALKM Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and ALKM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs DNDT Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 645.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while DNDT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs FBEC Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 585.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and FBEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs FMBV Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FMBV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs HSEEF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs VGID Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and VGID have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs NTEI Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 272K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while NTEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and NTEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs ASII Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 265.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs KGKG Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs FHBC Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and FHBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs HFBG Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 197K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs DNAX Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs GHMP Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and GHMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs MLHC Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs TBEV Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 79.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs EQLB Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 71.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs NBVG Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs STZU Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs PPBV Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs FGFT Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and FGFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs BGEM Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and BGEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs BVNNF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and BVNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs KRED Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs SWRI Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and SWRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs HKBV Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs MCHA Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and MCHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs BBDA Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and BBDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs AQUI Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs ABVG Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and ABVG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs RMIL Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.
UNPSF vs GGGRF Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF and GGGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNPSF vs CLCL Comparison
UNPSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNPSF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNPSF is priced at $0.89, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNPSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.77, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNPSF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNPSF is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNPSF.